Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Childminder in Barnet

Inspected — · published 11 Jul 2014 · URN EY349150

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • URN verified

    EY349150

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−20Mixedmore positive than 15% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivesecuresafe
Criticisminadequate

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings349w−23
  • What needs to improve232w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
581
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%What needs to improve 40%

Full report text

Store Street Manchester M1 2WD Telephone: 0300 123 1231 Fax: 0300 123 3159 Minicom: 0161 618 8524 Email: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk Web: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Monitoring for provision judged as inadequate

An Ofsted inspector, S Campbell , monitored your provision on 17/06/2014 following your inspection where the provision was judged to be inadequate.

p.1

Outcome of monitoring

As a result of our inspection on 27/03/2014, we sent you a notice to improve. If you were set actions at the inspection, or as a result of our subsequent monitoring or investigations, these are included at the end of this letter unless we have already verified that they have been completed.

p.1

Outcome of monitoring

During the monitoring visit the inspector discussed with you the steps you have taken to address the actions raised at your last inspection. She observed that the adult-to-child ratio and the safety of the garden including outdoor toys. The inspector also discussed the childminder's risk assessments for identifying potential hazards. The inspector discussed the deployment of co-workers to ensure children are within sight and hearing and observed they play experiences provided for children.

p.1

Outcome of monitoring

The inspector found that you have taken appropriate action so that the adult-to-child ratio is maintained. The inspector found that suitable risk assessments are in place to identify potential hazards and ensure appropriate action is taken to ensure broken toys are inaccessible to children. The inspector found that you have developed a secure understanding of the importance of ensuring that you and your co-minder are adequately deployed to ensure children's well-being. For example, ensuring an adult is both indoors and outdoors to supervise children's play and their rest times. The inspector observed that children are engaged and have access to a range of toys that are age and developmentally appropriate to support their learning.

p.1

Outcome of monitoring

You stated to the inspector that you recently received contact from local authority for support, and that you will make contact in the near future to attend courses to strengthen practice in relation to the care and learning for younger children. Having considered all the evidence, the inspector is of the opinion that the childminder has taken prompt and effective action to address the points for improvement.

p.1

Next steps

The next step will be a full inspection.

p.2

Next steps

I hope that you have found the visit helpful in promoting improvement in your childminding service. If you have any further queries please contact us on the number at the top of this letter.

p.2

Next steps

Nick Hudson National Director, Early Education

p.2

Action Due date Closed date

ensure that all necessary measures are taken to minimise any identified risks (voluntary part of the Childcare Register). 14/04/2014 17/06/2014

p.3

Action Due date Closed date

ensure that ratio requirements are met at all times, so that a maximum of six children under the age of eight are cared for at any one time; of these six children a maximum of three may be young children, and there should only be one child under one year 14/04/2014 17/06/2014

p.3

Action Due date Closed date

make sure that identified hazards in the outside play area are made safe or inaccessible to children 14/04/2014 17/06/2014

p.3

Action Due date Closed date

ensure that children are adequately supervised and decide how to best deploy co-workers to ensure children's needs are met, remembering that children must be usually within sight and hearing of the childminder and always within sight or hearing 14/04/2014 17/06/2014

p.3

Action Due date Closed date

take full account of the individual needs, interests, and stages of development of babies in your care and use this information to plan enjoyable experiences in the prime areas of learning 14/04/2014 17/06/2014

p.3

Action Due date Closed date

ensure that all necessary measures are taken to minimise any identified risks (compulsory part of the Childcare Register) 14/04/2014 17/06/2014

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion