Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

St Helena School

Inspected 19 Jun 2014 · published 10 Jul 2014 · URN 137944

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    19 Jun 2014

  • Inspectors verified

    Asyia Kazmi, David Webstar, John Daniell, John Ubsdell

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Previous overall verified

    Requires improvement

  • Postcode verified

    CO3 3LE

  • Name on report verified

    St Helena School

  • URN verified

    137944

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2013.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+54Positivemore positive than 15% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandinghigh expectationsstrongconfidentwell-plannedeffectivelygood progresshighly effective
Criticisminadequateat riskconcernsrequires improvementnot consistentlyseriousweaknessesfalling behind

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1489w+69
  • Leadership766w+28
  • What needs to improve95w+43

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,270
shorter than usual (typical 2966)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 47%Leadership 24%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 26%

Full report text

School report St Helena School Sheepen Road, Colchester, Essex, CO3 3LE

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Requires improvement 3 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a good school.  Students’ achievement is good across a range of subjects, including mathematics. In English it is outstanding. Standards are rising rapidly and students now attain results close to the national average.  Good teaching is typified by well-planned lessons and activities structured that aid students’ systematically learning.  Outstanding teaching is characterised by high expectations resulting in enthusiastic, vibrant learning.  Behaviour and safety of students is good. Students demonstrate mature, sensible attitudes to learning. They support each other in their work, enjoy school and attend well.  Additional classes, visits, clubs and sporting activities all help to improve outcomes for students and aid in their enjoyment of school life.  Senior leaders have taken effective, decisive action to improve teaching which has resulted in improved standards. They have created a culture of high expectations for students.

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

 Leaders have established good systems to regularly review students’ progress as well as their well-being. This enables leaders to take appropriate action for students at risk of falling behind.  Governors are active, well-informed partners in driving forward improvement.

p.1

It is not yet an outstanding school because

 Senior leaders recognise that more needs to be done to communicate and engage effectively with parents.  Support staff have not had the same investment in their training as teachers in improving their skills and performance.  Opportunities are missed to involve students in school improvement.  Teachers do not consistently plan questions that will challenge students, particular the more able.

p.1

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors observed teaching and learning in 29 lessons, including tutor time. Four of these observations were conducted jointly with a member of the school’s senior leadership team.  In planning and carrying out the inspection, inspectors took account of: the 46 responses to Ofsted’s online questionnaire (Parent View), the 94 responses to the Ofsted’s staff questionnaire, and the school’s own parental survey.  Inspectors analysed examination results for the school since it opened as an academy. They scrutinised the school’s current assessment data, minutes of meetings, school policies, safeguarding documentation, records relating to behaviour and safety, and the school’s self- evaluation summary. Inspectors undertook a book scrutiny to consider students’ achievement over time in a range of subjects.  Inspectors met with senior and middle leaders, teachers, students from Years 7 to 10, the Chair

p.2

Information about this inspection

and Vice-Chair of the Governing Body and a representative of the North East Essex Education Partnership.  At the time of the inspection, Year 11 had left the school, and for part of the inspection Year 10 students were undertaking examinations.

p.2

Inspection team

Asyia Kazmi, Lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector John Daniell Her Majesty’s Inspector David Webstar Additional Inspector John Ubsdell Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 St Helena School is an average-sized secondary school with a slightly higher proportion of girls than boys. It converted to become an academy in March 2012. There have been significant changes in staffing in the last few years.  St Helena School is part of the North East Essex Education partnership, a formal collaboration of seven academies in the area. The school benefits from and provides support to other schools in the partnership.  The majority of students are from White British heritage. About 15% of students are from a range of different minority ethnic heritages.  The proportion of students supported through the pupil premium is above the national average. Pupil premium is additional government funding for students eligible for free school meals, looked after children or children from service families.  The proportion of disabled students or those who have special educational needs supported

p.3

Information about this school

through school action is well below average. The proportion supported through school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is above average.  There are more students joining or leaving the school outside the usual admission dates than found nationally.  Eight students study vocational courses at Colchester Institute.  The school meets the current government’s current floor targets, which set the minimum expectations for students’ attainment and progress.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Maintain the focus on improving teaching and learning, and raise achievement further by:  increasing the challenge in lessons for all students, particularly those of higher ability, by providing greater opportunities for students to think and challenge themselves  developing students’ thirst for knowledge  ensure that staff are consistent in applying the school’s behaviour policy.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Ensure that all stakeholders are actively involved in supporting the school’s improvement journey by:  increasing the engagement of parents  involving students in improving the school’s work  ensuring that support staff are supported to improve.

p.3

The achievement of pupils is good

 Standards have risen rapidly so by the time students leave Year 11 their attainment in GCSE is close to the national average. In 2013, following an 11 percentage point increase, 56% of students attained five or more good GCSE passes, including English and mathematics. Given students’ significantly below average starting point, this represents good progress.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Good use is made of additional funding. Formal reading programmes for all Years 7 and 8 students, combined with regular reading in tutor time and a strong emphasis in promoting literacy in other subjects, all help to support rapidly rising standards in English. Students’ progress in this subject is outstanding.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Students’ achievement in mathematics is good and they make rapid progress in lessons because teachers are confident and skilled in teaching challenging topics. Standards in science, supported by new courses and some very effective teaching, are also rising.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Teachers’ high expectations translate into strong achievement, with students demonstrating accurate use of subject specific vocabulary, good understanding and excitement about the subject they are studying.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Gaps between different groups are rapidly closing. This reflects the school’s emphasis on promoting equality of opportunity. The achievement of disabled students and those who have special educational needs was significantly above the national average for this group last year and remains good this year. This is because the school adapted the curriculum to offer courses that enabled this group to succeed. Students from minority ethnic heritages also make good progress.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Students who join the school later than Year 7 attain lower standards than those who have been in the school longer. This is because they have not benefited from the school’s additional support for long enough.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 The gap in the standards attained by students supported by pupil premium funding and those who are not is narrowing rapidly. For the current Year 11, 58% of students are expected to achieve five good GCSE passes including English and mathematics. Of the students supported by pupil premium, 41% are expected to achieve the same standard. This is above the national average for this group and represents good progress because they joined the school with standards lower than their peers. In other year groups, this gap is smaller still because of the school’s additional work in supporting this group.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 The achievement of higher attaining students is also increasing. Specific intervention such as ‘A*ll Stars’ group and university visits have inspired more-able students to consider higher education, sometimes being the first in their families to do so. One student said the school ‘is making it more possible’ for them achieve.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 The current Year 11 were entered early for English and mathematics and comparisons with last year show increased achievement. The school will stop early-entry next year; it will be replaced with an innovative, formal mock examination to be undertaken by all seven partnership academies.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Students who receive education outside the school are well supported, with positive impact on their behaviour and achievement. They obtain results in line with the national average.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Students experience good and sometimes outstanding teaching. Staff have created a purposeful, productive environment for learning. Relationship between students and teachers are good and sometimes outstanding. Students understand what is expected of them and come prepared to learn.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Teachers are skilled in crafting a lesson together, using a range of resources and activities to systematically build up students’ understanding and skills. Students’ mature attitudes mean that they make good use of opportunities for them to work on their own and with each other.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 In a mathematics lesson, one student spontaneously used a mini-whiteboard to explain to a group of other students how to calculate a problem involving standard index form. In a science lesson, a group of boys persevered together with an experiment to understand forces, even though they found the topic difficult. In another lesson, students worked individually, referring to their books to answer questions.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Teachers have good subject knowledge and pitch lessons at the right level. There are good examples of teachers asking ‘hard’ questions of students who persevere in solving these problems, presenting their solutions, albeit hesitatingly.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Teachers plan collaboratively and common threads in lessons can be seen across different classes. This helps students to work together outside of lessons and maintains high expectations.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 There is a high level of consistency in how teachers are marking, often giving clear instructions to students on how to improve their work. Many students respond to teachers’ comments, correcting their work or tackling more challenging questions. Students value this approach.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Teaching in small intervention groups with students who have special educational needs is characterised by high expectations, patience in dealing with challenging behaviour, and skilfully keeping students on task. This enables them to make good, steady, progress.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 The half hour mixed-year tutor sessions are used constructively to teach, among other things, literacy and numeracy with the vast majority of students engaging in the activities set.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Teachers are missing opportunities to ask questions that will enable students, particularly those of higher ability, to stretch their thinking. Sometimes students are passive learners and do not demonstrate the thirst for knowledge seen in the best lessons in the school; this slows their progress.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 The behaviour of students is good. Across the school, students behave politely and courteously. They move around the building calmly and sensibly, and interact well with each other and with teachers. The school is tidy, classrooms are neat, and exercise books show that students have a pride in their learning and respond to comments that teachers make.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Many students and staff say that behaviour has improved in recent years. Attendance is rising and is above average. There have been no permanent exclusions in the last few years, and fixed-term exclusions have fallen. Persistent absenteeism is well below the national average.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Students who are at risk of exclusion successfully take part in a scheme run by the army to improve their self-discipline. Students value the support offered to them by staff.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Characterised by a mature approach to learning, students support each other in their studies and work well together. Senior leaders have involved students in drawing up the school’s code of conduct. Ex-students, now in Year 12 in local colleges, return to St Helena School to support current students, helping to raise aspirations and improve results.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 The school’s system for managing behaviour is well understood by students, although some teachers do not follow this system consistently. There are instances of less than good behaviour. Despite this, even in the few lessons where behaviour needs to improve, good examples were seen of students helping each other.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 The school’s work to keep students safe and secure is good. Students confidently report they feel safe. Many say they have not witnessed bullying and others report that, where they have seen it, they are confident that staff will deal with it effectively. They also feel confident about reporting it to the school prefects who say they are listened to by other students.

p.6

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 The school’s own survey of parents’ view and responses to Ofsted’s on-line questionnaire show parents have confidence in the school’s work in keeping students safe.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Leaders and managers in the school, led very ably by the headteacher, demonstrate high aspirations for their students. They have been successful, in a relatively short time, in bringing about substantial improvement. There is a positive ethos in the school and staff want to keep improving.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 There are good systems for senior leaders to know what is going on in their school. The regular use of assessment information is a particularly strong feature of the school’s work. This information is easy to interpret and maintains a strong focus on the students’ progress.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Senior leaders have rightly and successfully prioritised improving the quality of teaching in the school. They do not hesitate in having tough conversations about their expectations, and temper this with well-planned support, including coaching and training, to improve teaching. Support staff report they would welcome similar attention to improve their practice.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Heads of Year and subject leaders are held to account through half-termly student progress meetings and supported through a range of mechanisms. Senior leaders model their expectations well. For example, the headteacher is currently leading the science department.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The school uses the North East Essex Education Partnership (NEEEP) very effectively. This has included a coaching programme for teachers and a seconded deputy headteacher to raise achievement in Key Stage 4. The school now has capacity to support others, offering local schools support in languages teaching.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Students have the opportunity to study a wide range of courses which are well matched to meet their needs. Good support is provided for lower attaining students through extra classes, and extension classes for higher attaining students are raising aspirations. These all contribute to rising standards and students’ enjoyment of school life.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Students’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is good. Senior leaders have audited what the school offers students in this aspect and ensured that it is addressed through a variety of ways, such as the mixed-year tutor time. Students are complimentary about the school’s assemblies and are proud of the equality in the student body. Sport is a strength in the school, with success in a range of tournaments.

p.7

The leadership and management are good

 During the inspection, a very small number of parents raised concerns directly with inspectors. These were explored in the school. Inspectors are satisfied with the actions the school has taken to address and learn from these concerns. Senior leaders recognise that communication with parents, and their engagement in school life, needs to be strengthened.

p.7

The leadership and management are good

 The governance of the school:  Governors are very well-informed about the school. Their ambition and passion for the school is evident. Following a skills audit, they strengthened the governing body, injecting a good mix of educational and financial expertise. Modelling the focus on continuous improvement, governors have secured a coach to further improve their impact.  Governors gather information about the school at first hand, joining in activities such as work scrutiny, and make use of external information to develop a secure understanding of the school’s performance. They are confident in having challenging conversations with senior leaders, rewarding strong performance where appropriate and challenging weaker aspects.  A good system of accountability is established. Although the offer for students supported by pupil premium funding is discussed at governors’ meetings, they have now asked for regular

p.7

The leadership and management are good

reporting of achievement of these groups at their meetings.  Governors have ensured that statutory safeguarding requirements are met.

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.8

School details

Unique reference number 137944 Local authority Essex Inspection number 442089

p.9

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.9

School details

Type of school Secondary School category Academy converter Age range of pupils 11–16 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 873 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Barry Avis Headteacher Zoë King Date of previous school inspection 27 February 2013 Telephone number 01206 572253 Fax number 01206 543049 Email address contact@st-helena.essex.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.10

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.10

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.10

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion