Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 9 Jul 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Clive Moss

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Clive Moss

  • Postcode verified

    PE22 7QB

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+84Very positivemore positive than 87% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedeffectiveeffectivelypositiveclearconsistentaccurately

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
825
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
24 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
20%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Avril Moore Headteacher The Mareham-le-Fen Church of England Primary School School Lane Mareham-le-Fen Boston PE22 7QB

p.1

Church of England Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 18 June 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Church of England Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in March 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Church of England Primary School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, I met with the headteacher, the vice-chair of governors, the school’s mathematics coordinator, and a representative of the local authority. I evaluated the school’s improvement plan and read a summary of the most-recent discussions between the school and a national leader of education, who is providing support to the school. I toured the school, visiting all classrooms, and held discussions with some pupils.

p.1

Main findings

The actions you have taken are beginning to have a positive effect. The governing body is implementing actions as part of a plan drawn up as a result of an external review of governance carried out with the support of the local authority. It has Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 6799163 Direct email : lewis.mackie1@serco.com organised training to increase the skills of governors and revised its structures and the roles of individual governors, so that it is now able to monitor the work of the school effectively. It is, increasingly, holding the school’s leaders to account and setting priorities for improvement, for example, with regard to the achievement of particular groups of pupils, such as those with special educational needs. The school’s leaders are examining the impact of the provision for these pupils more

p.1

Main findings

There are early indications that the achievement of the pupils has improved as a result of the actions you have taken and that their attendance has improved also. You have improved the marking of the pupils’ work and I saw evidence of some consistent practice by the teachers. The pupils with whom I spoke understood the marking. They were able to explain how well they were doing and what they needed to do to improve. They told to me how, routinely, they are now able to respond to the marking and make corrections.

p.2

Main findings

The teachers are assessing the pupils’ work more accurately as a result of work you have carried out to help them identify levels correctly. They are, consequently, providing better guidance to the pupils on how to get to higher levels and setting more work that provides the pupils with an appropriate level of challenge. The pupils confirmed that, mostly, they are getting work that is at the right level, although I did see evidence of some work that the pupils were finding easy and which was not capturing their interest.

p.2

Main findings

All of the staff have undertaken training on conceptual understanding in mathematics. The school’s calculation policy has been re-written. These two actions combined have led to more problem-solving activities for the pupils in mathematics lessons and greater use of equipment to make the lessons more practical. The pupils are finding mathematics lessons more interesting, as a result, and so their motivation to do well has increased.

p.2

Main findings

Your improvement plan has some good points and is focussed on the areas for improvement from the inspection. It does not, however, make sufficiently clear who will do what and when, including regarding how progress with the plan will be monitored and evaluated.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection. I recommend that I stay in contact with the school and that a further visit takes place to monitor the progress of the school, with particular reference to improvements in leadership and management.

p.2

External support

The school has benefited from some effective external support, notably the review of governance and subsequent action carried out by the local authority. The school is still at a very early stage in developing a relationship with a national leader of education. There is not, however, a clear and coherent programme of support focused on the needs of the school that brings together the work of all the external partners working with the school. That makes it difficult for the school to incorporate all of the support effectively into its own plans and actions.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Lincolnshire and the director of education for the Lincoln diocese.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion