Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 7 Jul 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Tim Bristow

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Tim Bristow

  • Postcode verified

    LU4 8LD

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−20Mixedmore positive than 15% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveeffectively
Criticisminadequateweakyet tolow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
631
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Miss Yasmin Dhillon Headteacher Maidenhall Primary School Newark Road Luton LU4 8LD

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 16 June 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the third monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in March 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School

Senior leaders are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection, but governors are not. The school should take further action to:

p.1

School

 strengthen governance as a matter of urgency so that governors make an effective contribution to school improvement

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with the headteacher, other senior leaders, two members of the governing body and a representative from the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. Minutes from governor meetings were scrutinised. I visited a number of classes in the school to observe the teaching and learning. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9168 Direct email : narinder.kurana@serco.com

p.1

Context

Since the last monitoring inspection a number of teachers have left the school and a new senior leadership team has been appointed. The local authority issued the governing body with a warning notice this year.

p.2

Main findings

Governance has proved inadequate since the last inspection. Attendance at meetings is low and lines of communication with the senior leaders are weak. In part this was the fault of the inexperienced headteacher, but she has learned from her mistakes and is now a more effective communicator. Governors do not have a good enough understanding of what constitutes the role of the governing body. Consequently, they do not spend their time concentrating on the strategic development of the school, but get involved with operational matters that are not their responsibility. The local authority has worked to engage the governing body in training and with support at meetings. To date, this work has had too little impact which is why the local authority issued the warning notice and why the conclusions from the external review of governance were highly critical of the work of the governing body.

p.2

Main findings

Despite this, the headteacher, with the support of the new senior leadership team are driving improvements to teaching and achievement which are now much closer to good. They demonstrate that they have much increased capacity for further improvement. Standards this year in reading, writing and mathematics are rising because the proportion making the expected progress is favourable. The proportion that exceeds the expected progress is rising and is now close to average. Teachers benefit from structured support and training to strengthen their teaching. Consequently, pupils in most classes now receive teaching that has many good features.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The headteacher has been effectively supported both by the local authority and the headteacher from a local high performing school. This has enabled her to develop her leadership and communication skills and strengthen the quality of education in the school.

p.2

External support

Governors have been offered a range of training and support. Unfortunately, it has yet to have an impact on strengthening the governance of the school.

p.2

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Luton Local Authority. Yours sincerely

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion