Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Dilip Kadodwala
- Postcode verified
LE67 5AT
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 691
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 42, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs Siobhan Minford Headteacher Holy Cross School: A Catholic Voluntary Academy, Whitwick, Leicestershire Parsonwood Hill Whitwick Coalville LE67 5AT
p.1
Catholic Voluntary Academy, Whitwick, Leicestershire
Following my visit to your academy on 25 June 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Catholic Voluntary Academy, Whitwick, Leicestershire
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the academy was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in April 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Catholic Voluntary Academy, Whitwick, Leicestershire
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, I held meetings with you, two other leaders and three governors including the Chair of the Governing Body. I also met with two representatives of the academy trust. We visited all classes to look at the learning that was taking place. I looked at a range of documentation, including the academy’s information about pupils’ progress, a sample of pupils’ work and the academy’s improvement plan.
p.1
Main findings
You, staff and governors are determined to secure a good standard of education for all pupils. You had already identified the reasons behind the weaknesses in pupils’ achievement, particularly in writing and mathematics. You have wasted no time in Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9153 Direct email : naik.sandhu@serco.com making sure that teachers’ checking of pupils’ progress is more secure and that leaders’ meetings with teachers are more frequent. The latter help identify which pupils are underachieving and you are making sure that interventions to tackle weaknesses are in place. For example, individual pupils are having short, one-to-one sessions that are sharply focused on improving pupils’ literacy skills. External support from within the trust’s group of schools is being used well to improve teachers’ skills
p.1
Main findings
in assessing work so that it is more accurate. Your plan to access further support for subject leaders to work alongside external consultants and leaders is well judged. This is to make sure that the quality of subject leaders’ evaluations is robust when they check how well teaching is contributing to pupils’ progress over time. You have raised teachers’ expectations about the marking of pupils’ work and pupils’ responses to advice. You recognise that the expectations you have set out about marking have not been implemented as quickly as they could have been.
p.2
Main findings
Governors continue to make regular visits to the school. They have discussed the last inspection findings, which they agree to be an accurate reflection, and they are committed to bring about rapid improvement. They are taking a keen interest in the implementation of the school improvement plan which addresses all of the areas identified in the last inspection. Although the plan identifies measurable criteria for pupils’ achievement, these are not sharp enough in identifying the proportion of pupils expected to make specific amounts of progress. Moreover, the plan is unclear about the distinctive roles of those who are checking that actions are being carried out; and those who are evaluating whether the actions are leading to securing the improvements necessary for the school to be judged as good at its next inspection.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
You have quickly sought the support of senior leaders from a local school to help teachers see effective practice in assessing and tracking pupils’ work. Within the academy trust, there are other sources of expertise which you plan to use to help improve the quality of teaching and subject leadership. Securing external support with regard to marking pupils’ work effectively, to ensure speedier improvement in the school, is recommended. I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children and Family Services for Leicestershire.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion