Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 3 Jul 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

David Carter

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    David Carter

  • Postcode verified

    LE4 6AZ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+63Positivemore positive than 60% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivepositivepositivelyrigorousclearsecureimproving
Criticismnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
947
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Ms Joy Denning Headteacher Catherine Junior School Brandon Street Leicester LE4 6AZ

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 20 June 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in February 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

School

 address pupils’ prior underachievement in writing by developing their skills across the curriculum  ensure that governors undertake a systematic programme of visits in order to check the rate of improvement in their areas of responsibility.

p.1

Evidence

During the inspection, meetings were held with senior leaders, the leaders of English and mathematics, a group of eight pupils, members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority, to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I evaluated your plans for improvement. I considered documentation relating to the monitoring of teaching. I reviewed your most recent data relating to pupils’ achievement. We conducted a tour of the school. I considered the quality of Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9146 Direct email : clare.benson@serco.com teachers’ marking. I scrutinised the quantity and quality of pupils’ learning in a range of subjects.

p.1

Context

Since the last section 5 inspection the governing body has received a number of resignations from members of staff. A teacher of Year 3 pupils left the school in March 2014 and a temporary teacher has been appointed for the summer term. A teacher of Year 6 pupils and the leader responsible for disabled pupils and those with special educational needs are both leaving at the end of the summer term 2014. The governing body has appointed two assistant headteachers, to replace the departing staff, who will take up their positions in September 2014. The school has moved to a new building from temporary accommodation at the beginning of June 2014.

p.2

Main findings

You have provided teachers with clear guidance about what is expected in their practice. Allied to support from senior leaders, teachers are planning and delivering better structured and more interesting lessons. Teachers are using information from the school’s tracking system to set more challenging targets for pupils. Pupils say that they are provided with work which is set at the right level of challenge and they are more motivated to work towards achieving their targets. Teaching assistants have responded positively to training which has helped them to become more effective in providing support to pupils. This has particularly helped disabled pupils, those who have special educational needs and pupils who speak English as an additional language, to have a more secure understanding of phonics (letters and the sounds they make).

p.2

Main findings

You have developed the skills of senior leaders in making more rigorous checks on the quality of teaching. Their checks show that teaching is improving, particularly in reading and mathematics. This is reflected in pupils making faster progress in these subjects. Teachers have developed their understanding of how to improve pupils’ skills in grammar, punctuation and spelling. However, teachers are not providing enough support to help pupils to improve the quality of their compositions. Pupils are not developing their skills to write at length well enough, particularly in science, history and geography. Teachers’ expectations of the quality and quantity of pupils’ writing in their topic books are not high enough. Pupils do not receive sufficient guidance from teachers, such as through marking, to help them to improve their work, especially their topic work. As a result, pupils are not making fast enough

p.2

Main findings

progress in writing, where a legacy of prior underachievement exists.

p.2

Main findings

Governors have a better understanding of their roles and responsibilities, following an external review of their work. Governors are more aware of the support provided to those for whom the school receives pupil premium funding, and the extent to which this is having a positive impact on their achievement. The Chair and Vice-Chair of the Governing Body undertake frequent visits to check on developments. However, they are not supported well enough by other governors. Checks by governors who are responsible for subjects or other aspects of the school’s work are not undertaken often enough. As a result, senior leaders are not yet held fully to account for the rate of improvement.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The local authority advisor has provided effective support to the school. Senior leaders are challenged about the rate of improvement and the extent to which this is having a positive impact on pupils’ achievement.

p.3

External support

Leaders of English and mathematics have benefited from working with a Specialist Leader of Education from the Leicester Teaching School Alliance. She has helped them to develop their skills in undertaking checks on the quality of teaching.

p.3

External support

Senior leaders have a better understanding of how to hold teachers to account for pupils’ achievements through working with a Local Leader of Education based at Soar Valley College.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Leicester.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion