Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)
Beech Grove Primary School
Summary
Phillip Minns (lead), Susan Smith, Tracy Hannon
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
6 Jun 2014
- Inspectors AI-checked
Phillip Minns, Susan Smith, Tracy Hannon
- Leadership and management verified
Good
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Previous overall verified
Good
- Postcode verified
TA21 8NE
- Name on report verified
Beech Grove Primary School
- URN verified
123711
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2007.
- OverallGood
- Leadership and managementGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. p.7
- Systems to monitor and improve the performance of staff are very effective and have improved the quality of teaching. p.6
- Teaching is consistently good, with an increasing amount that is outstanding. p.1
- This is the result of the strong leadership of the headteacher who has developed an able team of leaders who share her strong commitment to the pupils in the school. p.5
- Pupils make at least good progress and enjoy learning. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. p.7
- Behaviour and safety are not yet outstanding because pupils’ attitudes to their learning are not of an equally high standard with different staff. p.5
- Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. p.7
- However, rates of progress in mathematics are not yet as strong as the progress pupils make in reading and writing. p.4
- Teaching is not outstanding because the level of challenge in lessons is not consistent across subjects and year groups. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 1,967
- shorter than usual (typical 2966)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 53, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
School report Beech Grove Primary School
p.1
Courtland Road, Wellington, Somerset, TA21 8NE
p.1
Overall effectiveness
Previous inspection: Good 2 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2
p.1
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is a good school. Achievement is good and has improved since the last inspection. This year, greater numbers of pupils are making good progress and reaching higher levels than previously. Teaching is consistently good, with an increasing amount that is outstanding. As a result, pupil progress is now almost always consistently good across the school. Pupils are well behaved and have positive attitudes to their learning. They value their school and enjoy making a positive contribution to it. Leadership, including middle leadership and governance, is strong and leading to improvements in outcomes for pupils.
p.1
It is not yet an outstanding school because
Children in the Reception class do not make fast enough progress in mathematics. Teaching assistants do not provide consistently high levels of support, which hinders pupils’ rate of learning. There is not enough outstanding teaching. Work is not always challenging enough for all pupils and does not enable them to make outstanding progress.
p.1
Information about this inspection
Inspectors visited 26 lessons and parts of lessons, four of which were conducted jointly with the headteacher. The inspectors met formally with pupils from Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2 and spoke to pupils in lessons, during lunch time and at break time. Inspectors scrutinised work in pupils’ books and listened to a group of Year 1 pupils read. Inspectors also spoke to pupils in Key Stage 2 about their reading. Inspectors considered the 35 responses to the staff survey and the 29 responses to Parent View, the online parent questionnaire. Inspectors also spoke with a number of parents during the inspection. Inspectors met formally with pupils, senior leaders, governors, and teachers. A range of documents was considered, including minutes of governing body meetings, external adviser reports, records relating to safety, attendance, safeguarding and behaviour, the school improvement plan and information on pupils’ current standards and rates of progress.
p.2
Inspection team
Phillip Minns, Lead inspector Her Majesty’s Inspector Tracy Hannon Seconded Inspector Susan Smith Additional Inspector
p.2
Information about this school
Beech Grove is slightly larger than most primary schools. The proportion of pupils who are eligible for the pupil premium is lower than average. This is extra government funding given to the school for children known to be eligible for free school meals and children looked after by the local authority. The majority of pupils come from White British backgrounds. English is an additional language for a small number of pupils. The proportion of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs supported at school action is higher than the national average. The proportion of pupils supported at school action plus or with a statement of special educational needs is much lower than the national average. The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which set minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress in reading, writing and mathematics.
p.3
What does the school need to do to improve further?
Increase the amount of outstanding teaching, so that greater numbers of pupils make rapid progress, by: providing high levels of challenge for all pupils in lessons improving the teaching of mathematics in the Early Years Foundation Stage ensuring that all teaching assistants are well deployed to enable pupils to make rapid progress.
p.3
The achievement of pupils is good
Children join the Reception Year with levels of development that are generally just below those expected for their age. During the year they make very good progress in most areas of learning, particularly reading and writing. Although children are well placed to enter Year 1, they do not make as much progress in the early development of their mathematical knowledge as they do in other areas. Standards are rising in Key Stage 1 because teaching has improved in reading, writing and mathematics. Pupils are increasingly able to achieve the higher levels in reading and writing because of the good start they get in the Early Years Foundation Stage. Improvements in mathematics are slower because pupils’ basic skills and knowledge are not as well developed by the time they leave the Reception class. Although standards in mathematics have risen steadily since the last inspection, not as many pupils achieve the higher levels in mathematics as do in
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
reading and writing. The teaching of phonics (the sounds that letters make) is very good. As a result, most pupils reach the expected standard by the end of Year 1, and all by the end of Year 2. Consequently, more pupils are now reaching the higher levels of reading by the end of Year 2. Pupils make good progress in Key Stage 2 and in previous years achieved standards significantly above the national averages. Although results in 2013 dipped, current pupils are achieving well. The most able pupils achieve well in the school. The proportion of pupils able to work at the higher levels in reading, writing and mathematics by the end of Year 6 is above the national average. The dip in the 2013 Key Stage 2 results confirmed that last year’s Year 6 pupils, who were eligible for the additional support, were a year behind their peers’ development. Recent improvements to the quality of teaching have increased pupils’ rate of learning. Consequently,
p.4
The achievement of pupils is good
the gap between the achievement of different groups has narrowed significantly in both English and mathematics. This can be seen in the success of all pupils in the Year 1 phonics assessment. Disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs make good progress, as do those who have English as an additional language. This is because the school ensures that these pupils receive the support they need in the classroom and effective additional support for specific individual needs.
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
Pupils make at least good progress and enjoy learning. Teaching is not outstanding because the level of challenge in lessons is not consistent across subjects and year groups. Consequently, some pupils do not achieve as highly as they might. Reading and writing are well taught. Lessons focus on developing basic skills well from the moment children enter the school. Teachers assess pupils accurately, plan lessons carefully and have good subject knowledge. Consequently, pupils do well and enjoy school. The teaching of mathematics has improved since the last inspection. As a result, pupils make good progress. However, rates of progress in mathematics are not yet as strong as the progress pupils make in reading and writing. This is because pupils do not have such a good start in mathematics as they do in English. Teaching is good, with an increasing amount that is outstanding. Where pupils are given a high
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
level of challenge in activities they are confident to tackle them head on. Where teaching assistants are well deployed and have the subject knowledge they need, they make a good contribution to pupils’ learning. However, in some lessons, teaching assistants provide too much help, which prevents pupils from thinking for themselves and slows their learning. Teachers use their knowledge of pupils’ development to plan subsequent lessons, which helps pupils to build on their prior learning. Teachers make their expectations clear for different groups of pupils. The needs of the most able pupils and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities are met well. Consequently, they improve their knowledge and understanding and make good progress. Teachers’ marking of pupils’ work in writing is of a very high quality. Pupils are consistently expected to evaluate their own work and this enables them to identify their own next steps in
p.4
The quality of teaching is good
learning. However, the marking of mathematics is not of the same high quality as other subjects and does not provide pupils with the same level of information and feedback.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
The behaviour of pupils is good. Policies and procedures are applied consistently by staff. Pupils are polite and understand the consequences of poor behaviour. They are confident that any concerns they have are taken seriously and dealt with promptly. Pupils have positive attitudes to their learning and enjoy coming to school. They feel safe and well looked after. The vast majority of parents also say that their children feel safe and happy at school. Behaviour and safety are not yet outstanding because pupils’ attitudes to their learning are not of an equally high standard with different staff. Consequently, the school does not yet have an exceptionally positive climate for learning. Pupils have a high opinion of the school and value the opportunities they have to make a difference to it. Year 6 pupils take their additional roles and responsibilities seriously to make their school a happier and safer place.
p.5
The behaviour and safety of pupils are good
The school’s work to keep pupils safe is good. There is a comprehensive approach to ensuring that pupils understand e-safety. All pupils, including the youngest in the school, have a good understanding of how to keep themselves safe when using the internet. Parents value the e- safety support available to them on the school website. There are well-developed systems to manage safety in the school and risk assessments are detailed and thorough. Pupils have a very good understanding of all types of bullying. Although they say little bullying occurs, they are confident that adults listen to them and take their concerns seriously. Attendance is improving. Although it was below the national average in 2013, it is now in line with national averages.
p.5
The leadership and management are good
The school has a strong culture of inclusion and respect that is valued by the whole community. Pupils speak about how they ‘come first’ in the school. They recognise that their interests are at the heart of everything the school does. This is the result of the strong leadership of the headteacher who has developed an able team of leaders who share her strong commitment to the pupils in the school. The provision for pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is very good. The school promotes equality of opportunity well. Pupils develop a sound grasp of their responsibilities as a citizen and have opportunities for leadership roles within the school and local community. For example, Year 6 pupils work towards a ‘Civic Award’ at the end of the year. Pupils speak passionately about this work. Leadership is not outstanding because some pupils do not achieve as well as they could. The curriculum is broad and balanced. Teachers ensure that work in different subjects is linked
p.5
The leadership and management are good
together so that pupils’ learning makes more sense to them. As a result, pupils speak enthusiastically about their learning. Pupils have a broad range of learning experiences, exciting visits and activities which support their learning. Literacy is taught particularly well, resulting in pupils being well prepared for the next stage of their education. There is a comprehensive range of clubs designed around pupil choice. Leaders have well established systems in place to monitor the school’s effectiveness. School plans focus on the right areas; actions taken since the last inspection have improved the quality of teaching. The government’s additional funding for sport is being used well to develop the expertise of staff and increase pupils’ involvement in sporting activities. As a result, there are increased levels of participation, with the most able sporting pupils now having the opportunity to compete with
p.5
The leadership and management are good
pupils from other schools. Parents and pupils value the range of sport available. In recent years, the school has received little support from the local authority. The school has made full use of its role in the local cluster of schools to share good practice and to support other schools. For example, senior leaders from the cluster have moderated their judgements on teaching to ensure that they are accurate, and an experienced teacher has supported other schools to moderate standards in writing. Middle leaders provide strong leadership and have a positive impact on raising standards. They make good use of leadership time to support teaching staff to develop. Systems to monitor and improve the performance of staff are very effective and have improved the quality of teaching. The ethos in the school is one of continual improvement where staff willingly accept advice. The governance of the school:
p.6
The leadership and management are good
Governors are fully involved in the life of the school. They provide good levels of challenge to leaders, both in meetings and through their visits. They regularly attend training to improve their skills. Governors understand the link between teachers’ pay progression and pupil achievement. Governors use data well to monitor pupil achievement and compare school results with national figures. Governors have ensured that the school is financially secure and that all funding is spent wisely. They have taken a particular interest in the way in which the pupil premium and sport premium are spent. Governors’ oversight of safeguarding is thorough. Statutory requirements for safeguarding are met.
p.6
Grade Judgement Description
Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is
p.7
Grade Judgement Description
failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.
p.7
School details
Unique reference number 123711 Local authority Somerset Inspection number 444136
p.8
School details
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.8
School details
Type of school Primary School category Maintained Age range of pupils 4−11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 299 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Cliff Marsh Headteacher Kerry Chappell Date of previous school inspection 3−4 March 2010 Telephone number 01823 662438 Fax number 01823 666497 Email address office@beechgrove.somerset.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .
p.8
School details
You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.
p.9
School details
You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
School details
achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please
p.9
School details
telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.
p.9
School details
T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion