Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 26 Jun 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Gaynor Roberts

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Gaynor Roberts

  • Postcode verified

    E1 5AW

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+30Mostly positivemore positive than 40% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveconsistentlysuccessfullyimprovedenjoypositiverobustconfident
Criticismweakernot alwaysnot consistent

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
1,013
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mrs Sheila Mouna Headteacher St Anne's Catholic Primary School Underwood Road Whitechapel London E1 5AW

p.1

Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 12 June 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in January 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Primary School

 ensure that actions undertaken to improve the quality of teaching are embedded consistently throughout the school  monitor closely the planned induction and support programme for both new teachers and new leaders from September 2014. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5307 Email : rachel.evans@tribalgroup.com

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you, senior and middle leaders, the Chair of the Governing Body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The school action plans were evaluated. You accompanied me on visits to nine classes. Key documents and the books of a group of pupils were scrutinised.

p.2

Context

Significant changes in staffing will be implemented from September 2014. One of your deputy headteachers is retiring and 5 teachers are leaving. The teacher who leads on pupil premium funding will be taking maternity leave. You have appointed an assistant headteacher and two new phase leaders. You have ensured coverage of leadership responsibilities such as that for pupil premium funding. You have successfully appointed to all the teaching vacancies, and will have three newly- qualified teachers and two Teach First students on the staff from September.

p.2

Main findings

Following the section 5 inspection, you adapted the existing action plan to incorporate areas for improvement identified in the report. The plan sets realistic timescales for actions to be undertaken, and identifies appropriate milestones to be achieved along the way. The plan is monitored through half-termly meetings which involve the local authority, governors and school leaders. Progress is then reported back to the full governing body. These monitoring and evaluation systems are not made explicit within the plan.

p.2

Main findings

You consider the quality of teaching is improving and this was borne out during our observations. You have reviewed and simplified the marking policy to ensure that it is practicable, and pupils can understand feedback they receive from teachers. Both teachers and pupils say this has improved their work, and pupils enjoy using ‘polishing pens’ to respond to teacher comments. However, this improvement is not consistent throughout the school. We agreed that where marking is weaker, the standard of pupils’ work, including presentation, is also weaker. In most of the classes visited in Key Stage 2, almost all pupils were all working on the same task. As a result, the more able are not always sufficiently challenged, and the less able do not receive the support they need.

p.2

Main findings

Following the inspection, you introduced a new programme to improve standards in writing. Some display boards have been replaced with ‘working walls’ for literacy and numeracy, providing relevant information that pupils can refer to in class to support their work. You are starting to see a positive impact of these initiatives through increased rates of progress. Professional development opportunities for staff following the inspection have focused on the areas for improvement identified in the report. Staff can talk about improvements in their practice following training and visits to other schools. You are aware that changes in staffing for September 2014 may weaken the impact of improvements you have made so far. Therefore, you have put robust support systems in place. This includes, for example, new teachers joining the school in July and each having an experienced mentor identified.

p.2

Main findings

Recent results for achievement in the Early Years Foundation Stage show that in 2014, over half of children reached a good level of development. This is a significant improvement from around a third in 2013. You are collating detailed information on the achievement of groups of pupils, including those eligible for pupil premium and those with special educational needs. You are confident that results in both Year 2 and Year 6 will also show improvement.

p.3

Main findings

A review of pupil premium spending has taken place and recommended actions are underway. The lead teacher for pupil premium has identified eligible pupils who are underachieving. Actions have been undertaken to address this, and the impact on achievement measured on an individual basis. As a result, you consider the gap in achievement to be closed in Key Stage 1, and closing in Key Stage 2. Governors have a clear understanding of where funding is spent and a new link governor has recently been recruited. You have identified the need to monitor more closely the impact of different aspects of your spending in this area.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

You consider the support of the local authority to be effective as you seek to improve the school. The level of their support was increased in the autumn term when a review of the school’s performance was undertaken. The local authority have provided appropriate support and challenge through half-termly meetings. Leaders describe this support as collaborative, and local authority officers work alongside you to develop, implement and monitor plans. Several local authority consultants have visited the school to support improvements in reading, early years assessment information and moderation of work at Key Stage 1.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Tower Hamlets and the Diocese of Westminster.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion