Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Postcode verified
DN22 0PE
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 790
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
David Fotheringham Headteacher Gamston CofE (Aided) Primary School Stanboard Lane Gamston Retford DN22 0PE
p.1
(Aided) Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 16 June 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most-recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
(Aided) Primary School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in February 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
(Aided) Primary School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Evidence
During the inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher and deputy headteacher, members of the governing body, and representatives of the local authority and the diocese to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I toured the school, visited all classrooms and held discussions with some pupils. I evaluated the school’s post-inspection action plan. I looked also at the school’s latest data on the progress of the pupils, some of the Reception-Year children’s ‘learning journeys’, reports by an external consultant on the work of the teaching assistants, and read a letter from a parent sent to the school for my attention. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9158 Direct email : rachel.dayan@serco.com
p.1
Main findings
You began quickly working on the areas for improvement from the inspection. Your approach to making the necessary improvements has been thoughtful, considered and systematic. You have identified suitable initiatives for improving the pupils’ achievement in writing and in mathematics and have begun the staff development needed to enable the proper introduction of those initiatives at the start of next academic year.
p.2
Main findings
You have already reorganised the teaching of phonics (the sounds that letters make). As a result, you have seen notable improvements in the pupils’ understanding and application of phonics, compared with last year.
p.2
Main findings
You and the senior leaders at the school are looking more closely at the quality of the teachers’ planning and at how the teachers mark the pupils’ work. There are signs that this is leading to better practice. The pupils are getting more opportunities to write in different subjects and for a range of purposes.
p.2
Main findings
The pupils with whom I spoke talked enthusiastically about the broader range of opportunities to write. They spoke also about getting more opportunities to respond to the teachers’ marking. Your data suggest that the improvements in teaching are leading to the pupils making more progress than previously.
p.2
Main findings
It was evident, however, that not all of the pupils understood the teachers’ comments and how to respond to them. It was apparent also that the work that the pupils are given is not yet routinely challenging the most able as much as it might.
p.2
Main findings
Reports by a consultant working with the school show recent improvement in the extent to which teaching assistants are engaged actively in promoting the pupils’ learning. I saw examples of teaching assistants working closely with pupils when I visited the classrooms.
p.2
Main findings
You have re-defined the role of subject leaders, so that it is clearer what they are expected to do, with particular regard to the areas for improvement at the school. Similarly, the governing body is changing the responsibilities of individual members, so that it will also be better equipped to monitor the school’s progress.
p.2
Main findings
Members of the governing body are well informed and knowledgeable about the work of the school. As a result, they have been able to work productively with the senior leaders and ensured that the school’s post-inspection improvement plan is fit for purpose. The plan does not, however, indicate sufficiently how the pupils’ achievement will be improved by the actions it proposes, or how the school will measure its progress. Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The school has access to a good range of suitable external support. It is working productively with its partners, including the local authority. The local authority has helped to organise a partnership for the school with another, outstanding school. Importantly, you have at the same time taken the initiative, identified and begun working with other partners and networks to assist with developments at Gamston CofE Primary.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Nottinghamshire and the director of education for the Nottingham and Southwell diocese.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion