Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Lorna Brackstone
- Postcode verified
BS32 0ES
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This is enabling them to have a greater understanding of the gaps in achievement and to plan ways to support those pupils who are not doing as well as they should. p.2
- The school should take further action to: p.1
- Visit notes show that despite some improvement in the way that pupils present their work, the school needs to do more to improve the quality of pupils’ handwriting. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 1,106
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 49, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 14%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs Clare Whitaker Bowsland Green Primary School Ellicks Close Bradley Stoke Bristol BS32 0ES
p.1
Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 10 June 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Primary School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in February 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Primary School
Senior leaders, governors and the local authority are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.1
Primary School
act upon the advice given by the local authority to make rapid improvements to the Early Years Foundation Stage provision. ensure that there is a consistent approach to handwriting so that improvements in pupils’ presentation skills can be accelerated. use the findings of the upcoming external review of the governing body to quickly develop governor’s ability to challenge the performance of the school. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with you, the deputy headteacher, a representative from the local authority and three members of the Governing Body to discuss the action taken from the last inspection. I also spoke with your school improvement adviser, a group of teachers and some pupils about the changes which had taken place since the inspection. The school improvement plan was evaluated and the findings of two recent local authority reviews were considered.
p.2
Context
Since the section 5 inspection the deputy head has returned from maternity leave. A teacher has been appointed on a temporary contract to cover another maternity leave.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders have implemented a more rigorous system to monitor and measure the impact of teaching on pupil progress. This is enabling them to have a greater understanding of the gaps in achievement and to plan ways to support those pupils who are not doing as well as they should. It is also highlighting those classes where teachers require support to improve their teaching.
p.2
Main findings
There has been improvement in the way that pupils present their work. This is because teachers are developing higher expectations of what pupils can achieve. The presentation in the pupils’ numeracy books has improved significantly. By launching a campaign where neat work is rewarded and celebrated, pupils are gaining a better understanding of what good quality work looks like. Most teachers have embraced the higher standards expected of them and are working hard to put into place the agreed principles for high quality teaching. However, these are yet to fully embed into all parts of the school. For example, the new marking policy is having a positive impact on pupil progress but it is not used as well as it could be by all teachers. Although there are examples of books that are marked well, this is not a consistent feature of teaching.
p.2
Main findings
A review of the Early Years Foundation Stage has reduced the excessive amount of time spent on developing reading skills in these classes. This review highlights that provision for the youngest children does not always challenge and motivate them sufficiently well. By auditing the resources available to the Reception children, a need for equipment more suitable for this age range has been identified.
p.2
Main findings
An external review of the school’s use of pupil premium has taken place and senior leaders have received training in the use of this fund. As a consequence, a policy has been developed and a member of the governing body has been appointed as a link governor to oversee the use of pupil premium. Teachers now have a greater knowledge of those pupils who are entitled to this funding. They track the achievement that these pupils make and are accountable to key stage leaders for the amount of individual progress being made. Pupils in receipt of extra funding have eight hours additional support from teaching assistants. During these group sessions key skills already taught in class lessons are reinforced and preparations for future sessions help to build the pupils confidence.
p.2
Main findings
Senior leaders, including governors, now have a clearer understanding of their part to play in the improvement journey of this school. A small proportion of roles have been reallocated to enable those with the most appropriate skills to lead on a subject or area of responsibility. Teacher performance is being carefully tracked and support put into place for those staff whose teaching requires improvement. As a result of coaching and support, some staff have improved their teaching skills. However, others have not and this remains a concern.
p.3
Main findings
Due to unforeseen circumstances the external review of governance was not able to take place as planned but is due to take place in the very near future. Meanwhile, an external consultant has helped them gain a clearer picture of their roles and responsibilities.
p.3
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.3
External support
The local authority provides considerable support for the school. They have recently completed a school review which reported positively on a number of key improvements. Reviewers indicated that school leaders have the capacity to lead the improvements required. The headteacher has been allocated a local headteacher to work with. This is starting to influence practice and encourage deeper reflection. The improvement adviser has been working closely with the English subject leader to improve standards in writing. Visit notes show that despite some improvement in the way that pupils present their work, the school needs to do more to improve the quality of pupils’ handwriting. Following a review of the Early Years Foundation Stage, a local authority advisory teacher has been working with teaching staff to improve provision. Classrooms are now set out better to support children’s learning and staff are engaged in developing their teaching. Nevertheless, there is still some
p.3
External support
way to go before these changes rapidly improve pupils’ progress. Mentors have been very recently organised for the literacy and numeracy leaders and the Chair of Governors to work with. It is too early to see the impact of this work.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for South Gloucestershire.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion