Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 25 Jun 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Chris Smith

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Chris Smith

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+5Mixedmore positive than 27% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectiveimprovingpositiveaccuratesecure
Criticismnot yetyet toconcernslimitednot knowledgeable

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
972
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 45
Average sentence
23 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
16%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566933 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: ggleaden@cfbt.com

p.1

Mrs Mary-Jane Murray Headteacher Chapel Haddlesey Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School Chapel Haddlesey Selby North Yorkshire YO8 8QF

p.1

of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School, North Yorkshire

Following my visit to your school on 4 June 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School, North Yorkshire

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in March 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School, North Yorkshire

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School, North Yorkshire

ensure the school improvement plan includes appropriate targets for the achievement of each year group, so that governors can check whether actions taken to raise standards are working effectively  complete an external review of governance before the end of the summer term and produce plans to develop the skills of the governing body further  increase the frequency of assessment so that pupils making slower progress in reading, writing or mathematics are identified early and quickly receive additional support.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with: you and two other teachers; a member of the governing body; a representative of the local authority; and a group of pupils, to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. We visited both classes and observed pupils’ behaviour and attitudes and looked at some of their books. I evaluated the school’s plans for improvement and scrutinised other documents including minutes of governing body meetings, checks on the quality of teaching and pupil progress data.

p.1

Context

Since the last inspection, one member of the governing body has resigned and has not yet been replaced. There have been no changes to staffing. A new programme for teaching mathematics has been introduced.

p.2

Main findings

You were disappointed with the judgement of the recent section 5 inspection, but everyone is determined to ensure the school will be judged to be a good school in the next inspection. You have put in place plans to improve the school which focus very much on improving the teaching of mathematics and developing the role of the governing body. Whilst your plans have identified appropriate actions and timescales, they do not include specific targets for the achievement of pupils, which would help you and the governors to gauge whether or not the school is on course to achieve higher standards of achievement.

p.2

Main findings

The actions you are taking to improve standards in mathematics are having a positive impact and pupils are beginning to make better progress. You introduced a new mathematics scheme immediately after the last inspection, and this has ensured teachers carefully check what each pupil knows, understands and can do. The work set now builds on pupils’ prior knowledge and understanding effectively. Teachers now plan the key questions they will ask to extend pupils’ learning in mathematics. However, some opportunities for pupils to apply mathematics in other areas of the curriculum are not planned as thoroughly. For example, opportunities to extend pupils’ use of mathematics in the eco-project we observed had not been planned.

p.2

Main findings

Tracking data shows pupils in Key Stage 2 are expected to reach higher levels of attainment in mathematics this year. However, the school’s data also shows some concerns with the progress pupils are making in writing. You are fully aware that pupils’ progress in reading, writing and mathematics needs to be monitored carefully. However, you do not assess pupils’ progress often enough to ensure pupils get additional support quickly, when they make slower progress.

p.2

Main findings

Since the last inspection you have increased the number of lesson observations, some of which have been made jointly with the local authority adviser. These observations, together with checks on the work in pupils’ books, are helping to give you a more accurate evaluation of the quality of teaching. You have planned to make some lesson observations with another headteacher, in order to ensure judgements are secure, but these are yet to take place. The governing body has established a group that meets fortnightly to check on the progress the school is making. This group is increasingly familiar with the impact of planned actions and is beginning to challenge you on areas where progress is slower. However, the remit of this group is too broad and needs to focus specifically on evaluating the impact planned actions are having on the quality of teaching and achievement. Other governors that are not on this group are less knowledgeable and are yet to develop their role as critical friend.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The external review of governance has not yet taken place. The governing body has received some limited training from the local authority, but this has not been sufficient to ensure all members of the governing body can contribute effectively to improving the school. The local authority adviser attached to the school is providing you with useful support to evaluate the quality of teaching and utilise data effectively. The school is part of a local collaboration designed to strengthen support between schools, but this initiative is at an early stage and has not, as yet, had a significant impact.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children's Services for North Yorkshire.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion