Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Robert Pyner
- Postcode verified
GL14 3DH
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment7
“Gary Law Headteacher St White's Primary School St White's Road Cinderford GL14 3DH” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 964
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 2%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Gary Law Headteacher St White's Primary School St White's Road Cinderford GL14 3DH
p.1
Special measures monitoring inspection of St White's Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 10 June 2014 with Paul Jones, Associate Inspector, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Special measures monitoring inspection of St White's Primary School
The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures following the inspection which took place in December 2013.
p.1
Evidence
During this inspection, in addition to our meetings and the visits to all classrooms that we carried out together, I had a discussion with three members of the governing body, including staff governors. As the Chair of the Governing Body was away on the day I was in the school, I spoke with him on the telephone the day before my visit. I also held a meeting with a representative of the local authority. I evaluated the local authority’s statement of action and considered the reports following the reviews of the governing body and the school’s use of the funding for pupils in receipt of the pupil premium. Together with this, I examined the reports produced following the two reviews of the progress at the school which have been undertaken by the local authority since the last inspection. I also evaluated the school’s raising attainment plan and examined the record of statutory checks on staff and volunteers.
p.1
Evidence
Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com
p.1
Context
Since the section 5 inspection in December, there have been significant changes in the membership of the governing body. The Chair of the Governing Body changed in April and altogether four governors have joined the school since the inspection. There has been one addition to the administrative staff at the school and the clerk to the governors has been appointed. Currently, one member of the teaching staff is on maternity leave with her class being taught until the end of term by a supply teacher.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
You, your staff and governors are clearly committed to improvement. Since the inspection, there have been a range of developments and activities, some brokered or led by the local authority, which have helped to strengthen systems within in the school, including the tracking of the progress that pupils make. The frequency of monitoring has increased to take place each term. Linked to this development, the meetings with class teachers to discuss the progress of individuals and groups are synchronised with the progress-tracking cycle and attended by senior and middle leaders, class teachers and teaching assistants. This represents the development of a more cohesive approach in order to support the improvement of the academic progress made by pupils. There have been significant changes in terms of governance. The review of governance recommended in the inspection report has been completed and the report published recently. The local authority has also
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
completed the review of the school’s use of the pupil premium. In addition, the local authority has undertaken two reviews of the progress that the school has made since the inspection as part of its cycle for monitoring schools causing concern. These reports and reviews emphasise the need for the school to accelerate and focus improvements. They contain important recommendations to support improvement in specific areas and particularly the strategic leadership of the school.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
As its main planning tool, the school has developed the raising attainment plan to focus on the findings and recommendations from the inspection. This is a comprehensive document with considerable detail on objectives, impact expected, activities and monitoring arrangements. This large document is completed each term. Elements of the plan are a useful evaluative tool. However, overall it has become over annotated, unwieldy and not fit for purpose. In its current form, it is not a workable plan and reference document that can be used easily by staff and governors. The plan does not provide a clear and specific planning timetable of actions to tackle the school’s weaknesses noted in the last report. Indicators of how success will be measured are complex with a lack of clear milestones over time by which progress can be evaluated. It is not sufficiently clear how and when leaders, including the governing body, will check the difference that actions make to pupils’
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
learning and the quality of teaching. As it stands, the raising attainment plan does not support the strategic leadership of the school effectively.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The local authority has provided initial support promptly. The school intervention adviser has worked with the headteacher to develop a range of help for the school. This includes a partnership with a successful local school to support leadership and management overall, and particularly for phase and subject leaders. The local authority has also brokered specific support including regular reviews of teaching and learning. The statement of action promotes the school’s improvement well. It identifies clear actions, the individuals responsible for each activity and how these will be monitored. There is a clear timescale for improvement and progress is monitored by senior officers appropriately. The financial allocations for the resources needed for actions led or brokered by the local authority are clearly identified. Overall, the local authority has provided an effective balance of support and challenge.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
Following the monitoring inspection these judgements were made:
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The local authority’s statement of action is fit for purpose.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The school’s raising attainment plan is not fit for purpose.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The school may not appoint newly qualified teachers before the next monitoring inspection.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Gloucestershire. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion