Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 20 Jun 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Christopher Moodie

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Christopher Moodie

  • Postcode verified

    PE4 7XG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+30Mostly positivemore positive than 40% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedeffectiveeffectivelypositiveenthusiasticstrengthsclearimproving
Criticismweaknessesnot ambitiousnot yetnot stronglynot accurate

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
835
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Joanna Cook Headteacher Paston Ridings Primary School Paston Ridings Peterborough PE4 7XG

p.1

Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 6 June 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in February 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Primary School

 improve the quality of teaching so that more able pupils are provided with work that challenges them.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit I held meetings with you, other senior leaders, four members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I also evaluated the school’s action plan and monitoring and assessment documentation. You accompanied me during visits to several classes in the school, where we observed teaching and looked at pupils’ work. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9146 Direct email : clare.benson@serco.com

p.1

Context

Six teachers have resigned since the inspection and are set to leave the school at the end of the summer term. The school has appointed replacement teachers for the vacant positions. In addition, the school is seeking replacements for three teaching assistants who are leaving the school.

p.2

Main findings

You have quickly identified the priorities for improvement and, together with your senior leadership team, have started to tackle the issues identified by the recent inspection. Your improvement plan is detailed and you are using it to measure the school’s improvement effectively. This is most apparent in the changes that you have made to the way that reading is taught. Using the support of local authority advisers, teachers are now very focused on teaching the skills that pupils need in order to read well. Your monitoring of this change indicates that it is having a positive impact on standards of reading. It is clear that pupils value the new focus and many are enthusiastic about reading.

p.2

Main findings

Your work to improve the quality of marking is providing pupils with a better understanding of what they need to do to improve their work. Teachers’ marking is improving across the school. In some classes the quality of marking is high, as pupils respond to the comments and suggestions that their teachers are making by showing that they understand what to do next.

p.2

Main findings

Your improvement plan rightly identifies that more able pupils are not challenged enough and do not make the progress that they are capable of. Teachers’ plans to challenge and extend the learning of this group of pupils are not ambitious enough. This is an area that needs more work. Pupils of different abilities often have the same tasks to do and more able pupils only access additional work after completing the easier work. This means that it takes too long for these pupils to access the work that challenges them.

p.2

Main findings

Your work to improve the accuracy of assessment is underway and teachers are developing a clearer understanding of how to gauge the level of a pupil’s work. Assessment in the Early Years Foundation Stage has improved since the inspection but is not yet accurate enough to enable a smooth transition from the Reception classes into Year 1.

p.2

Main findings

Senior leaders are building a secure understanding of the strengths and weaknesses in teaching through their monitoring activities. However, assessment data does not feature strongly enough in judging the quality of a teachers’ work.

p.2

Main findings

The governing body has arranged for an external review of their work to take place in late June 2014. It has recognised the need to challenge school leaders more. Members of the governing body have attended local authority training to improve their understanding of school assessment data. The governing body has improved the way that it monitors the risk assessments that the school undertakes for visits, trips and in-school activities.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

The local authority is providing an appropriate level of support and is contributing to the progress that the school is making. A literacy adviser has supported the school’s work to improve reading and is monitoring the impact of this work. Another adviser is helping teachers to improve their assessment practice and a senior advisor is working with you to plan for further improvement.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Peterborough.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion