Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Deana Holdaway
- Postcode verified
B63 4DZ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 971
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 38, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Stevie Parkes Huntingtree Primary School Bournes Hill Hasbury Estate Halesowen B63 4DZ
p.1
School
Following my visit to your school on 6 June 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in February 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.1
School
follow up the training needs of governors as identified in the review of governance ensure that governors are clear about their statutory duties so that they can contribute effectively to the school’s strategic direction.
p.1
Evidence
During the inspection, meetings were held with you, the two deputy headteachers, the learning leaders for mathematics and English, the Chair and Vice Chair of the Governing Body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the actions taken since the last inspection. The school improvement plan was evaluated. I also viewed pupils’ books, records of pupils’ progress, home-school diaries and subject action plans focusing on improvements to reading, writing and mathematics. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 6799169 Direct email : mathew.mitchell@serco.com
p.1
Context
There has been no significant change to staffing since the section 5 inspection, which judged the school to require improvement.
p.2
Main findings
You have worked quickly with the deputy headteachers and learning leaders in response to the areas for improvement identified in the last inspection. You have established a purpose-driven culture so that all staff understand why changes are necessary and how they will be achieved. All leaders, managers and governors communicate a strong sense of ambition and determination to bring about the necessary improvements.
p.2
Main findings
You have introduced a new system to track pupils’ progress over time and offered training for all staff in its use. You have checked teachers’ assessments of pupils’ achievements and rates of progress. Teachers, managers and senior leaders have moderated each other’s judgements. Groups of pupils who are not making sufficient progress are now identified quickly and additional, tailored support is provided. You regularly review these interventions so that successes can be built on and weaknesses remedied. The deputy headteachers and learning leaders gave detailed examples of pupils’ increasing ability to accurately assess themselves and correctly determine their next steps. Detailed records of all pupils’ progress in reading, writing and mathematics show increased proportions of pupils making accelerated progress.
p.2
Main findings
The deputy headteachers have taken a strong and effective lead in supporting staff; identifying the necessary improvements; and taking steps to improve the quality of teaching overall. Policies have been reviewed and updated to ensure that all teachers are aware of the consistent systems, procedures and standards expected of them. You have provided additional time for teachers, including those who are newly qualified, to observe skilled teachers and share good practice. The learning leaders for English and mathematics provide regular support for individual members of staff with differing needs. They gather a range of evidence from lesson observations, pupils’ books, pupil progress information and home-school diaries so that their support is planned for each teacher’s specific needs. Aspects of teaching such as planning for purposeful learning, providing informative feedback and developing questioning techniques are supported, monitored and checked. Learning leaders
p.2
Main findings
provide carefully targeted support to improve teacher’s subject knowledge so they are more able to overcome pupils’ barriers to learning. Immediate feedback is provided and development points are checked. Your records show that this course of action has not only strengthened the quality of teaching but also improved the pupils’ rates of progress. Teachers, managers, leaders and governors are all acutely aware of the link between the quality of teaching and the standards pupils achieve. As a consequence, there is a strong sense of accountability and responsibility. Learning leaders and deputy headteachers check that reading, writing and mathematics are planned with sufficient breadth so that pupils acquire the necessary knowledge. Leaders regularly work with individual teachers to ensure that lesson activities include open-ended tasks, investigations and problem solving and provide opportunities for writing for different purposes. Resources have been purchased to
p.2
Main findings
encourage older pupils to read more widely. Ongoing support and checks establish clear and shared expectations and help to identify follow-up training requirements.
p.3
Main findings
The school development plan is a working document which addresses the areas for improvement identified in the previous inspection. Individual actions are suitably specific. Those staff responsible for taking the lead for any action are clearly identified. Expected improvements are identified and linked with measurable outcomes. Governors have created a new committee to monitor the school’s improvement. A review of governance has begun and a report is expected in the very near future. Although governors have received some recent training they will plan a more detailed programme of development in response to the review.
p.3
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.3
External support
The local authority representative knows the school well and has been both supportive and responsive to the needs of leaders and managers. She reported on learning leaders’ significant skills in providing speedy and knowledgeable support for individual teachers. Training has been provided for governors and a National Lead for Governance has been commissioned.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Dudley.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion