Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 18 Jun 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Janet Pearce

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Janet Pearce

  • Postcode verified

    PO7 5NQ

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+17Mostly positivemore positive than 33% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyoutstandingstrongextremelyeffectivewell-preparedconfidentlyimproved
Criticismineffectivepoorconcernsrequires improvementtoo lowslowabsencelower

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,123
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mrs Lucinda Clements Headteacher Purbrook Infant School Aldermoor Road East Waterlooville PO7 5NQ

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 5 June 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the third monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in January 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School

Senior leaders and governors are now taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

School

 ensure that all pupils, including those of middle ability, make better progress and reach national expectations  share examples of good and better teaching with all staff  improve the skills of existing senior and middle leaders in order to reduce reliance on external support. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you and the deputy headteacher, a group of middle leaders, the seconded senior leader and three representatives from the Governing Body. I also had a telephone conversation with a representative from the local authority. Information about pupils’ progress, school action plans, governors’ minutes, local authority progress reviews and other documentation relating to school improvement were evaluated. You took me on a tour of the school to observe teaching in all classes and to view the changes to displays and the school environment.

p.2

Context

A new teacher of Year 2 joined the school at the start of the summer term. Another teacher has returned from long-term absence.

p.2

Main findings

Following the previous monitoring inspection visit when I judged that actions taken to improve the school were ineffective, you have taken decisive action and galvanised staff to make essential improvements. There are continued concerns about staff changes and unfilled vacancies, but these are no longer being used as an excuse for slow improvement. You now provide clearer direction and demonstrate more ambition and determination to improve the school. For example, you took swift action to ensure that classrooms were tidied up and corridors cleared. Classroom displays are used more effectively to support pupils’ day-to-day learning and corridors now celebrate pupils’ achievements. You and the staff are taking much more pride in the more orderly and attractive appearance of the school.

p.2

Main findings

You have made sure that the quality of teaching and learning in the Early Years Foundation Stage is better. The classroom areas are brighter, tidier and more welcoming. Increased opportunities for talk, writing, reading and number work are clearly evident. The outdoor area has been reorganised with structured and purposeful tasks. There is clear evidence that teachers are taking much more account of individual children’s abilities and needs when planning activities. Teachers and teaching assistants question children effectively and check progress throughout the lessons. As a result, children are making much better progress and are being well-prepared for Year 1. During the monitoring inspection, it was a pleasure to observe children practising writing, reading books, engaged in sustained role-play and solving scientific and number problems, all on the theme of spiders. Attractive displays celebrating children’s art work supported this theme.

p.2

Main findings

Handwriting is improving and more pupils in the Early Years Foundation Stage and Year 1 are holding their pencils properly because they have been provided with aids to help them.

p.3

Main findings

Now that you have given the school a clearer sense of drive and direction, improvements in teaching are accelerating. However, teaching still requires improvement overall. There is not enough securely good teaching to share confidently with other staff as a model of good practice. In some cases, teachers concentrate their energies too much on what techniques and resources might work well in a lesson, rather than focusing closely on what their pupils need to know, practise and understand. In some lessons teachers do not insist that pupils are fully attentive when listening to questions and explanations, and in a few cases, pupils are not productive enough because they do not give tasks their full concentration.

p.3

Main findings

Pupils’ attainment and progress still require improvement. The most able pupils in Year 2 have made better progress recently in mathematics and reading levels are above the national average. However, current levels for a significant majority of Year 2 pupils are lower than national expectations. You have recognised this and are taking steps to ensure that appropriate extra support compensates for the legacy of poor teaching, so that pupils leaving the school are better equipped for the next steps in their education.

p.3

Main findings

Following my last monitoring inspection you have greatly improved the way that you present and analyse information about pupils’ progress. You are now measuring progress from pupils’ starting points which is allowing you to have a more accurate and realistic picture of how well they are doing. For example, although you rightly note that some pupils with special educational needs are making faster progress and catching up, their levels of attainment are still too low. Teachers and the local authority confirm that pupil progress meetings are more challenging and focused on the achievement of individual pupils.

p.3

Main findings

Governors have increased their direct involvement in the school and have strengthened their understanding of pupils’ progress. The headteacher’s report is thorough and provides governors with the information they need to hold the school to account. However, although governors ask challenging questions about pupils’ progress and the use of the pupil premium funding, they have not pushed hard enough for improvements in teaching.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

Since the previous monitoring inspection visit, the local authority has stepped up the level of support, particularly for leadership and management. The school has also benefited from strong support for English, mathematics and the Early Years Foundation Stage. The local authority brokered a link with a good school, which has helped to refresh teachers’ energy and enthusiasm. The seconded leader has also provided extremely valuable support with school leaders’ evaluation of teaching and pupils’ progress. The local authority has also ensured that governors have received useful support and guidance. Leaders, teachers and teaching assistants would further benefit from observing good and outstanding teaching in the partner school.

p.4

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Hampshire.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion