Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 10 Jun 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Judith Matharu

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Judith Matharu

  • Postcode verified

    LE15 9TJ

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+86Very positivemore positive than 89% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisevery wellstrongexemplaryexcellentpositivesuccessfullysuccessfulconfidently
Criticismseriously

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings585w+86
  • What needs to improve28w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
604
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 31, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 95%What needs to improve 5%

Full report text

Aviation House 125 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 0300 123 1231 F 020 7421 6855 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs J Turner Principal Uppingham Community College London Road Uppingham Rutland LE15 9TJ

p.1

alternative provision

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff and students, during my visit on 14 and 15 May 2014 to look at the college’s use of alternative provision. During the visit I met with you and a number of your senior colleagues with responsibility for alternative provision. I met with eight students and examined a range of documents. I also visited Engage and New College, Stamford, two of the following providers that your students attend.

p.1

alternative provision

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text without their consent.

p.1

alternative provision

This letter briefly summarises our discussion at the end of the visit.

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

 A small number of students are currently engaged in alternative provision. This is used to provide vocational options for some students as an alternative to a full academic curriculum and to successfully re-engage a very small number of students who are seriously alienated from college to retain their involvement in learning.  Through careful curriculum planning, a broad and balanced curriculum remains in place for all students. This ensures that any off-site provision fits very well with the core curriculum at college. Most importantly, this enables students to continue with GCSE courses in English, mathematics, science and design technology and retain a strong connection and identification with the college.  The emphasis placed on securing qualifications in English and mathematics has been successful. Last year, a considerable proportion of students attending off-site provision gained a grade C or above in

p.1

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

mathematics and although fewer gained a C or above in English, overall, the majority of students made expected progress.  You provide clear information and guidance for students and their parents and carers to guide decisions about curriculum choices at Key Stage 4. The care and support provided for individual students is exemplary. Students are well-known to staff and every effort is made to secure appropriate provision that meets their needs and aspirations. You and your staff demonstrate a discernable commitment to persevere and provide a bespoke curriculum to meet individual needs, in the face of challenging circumstances or significant barriers to learning.  Importantly, suitable emphasis is placed on securing provision that provides accredited pathways in order to support progression post-16. Information about students’ destinations indicates that, for a significant number of potentially vulnerable students, there is a strong correlation

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

between alternative and vocational provision and students’ destinations post-16.  There is excellent supervision of students on vocational courses. The presence of your staff at the FE College ensures that students are very well supported through careful monitoring of their work and progress. The routine follow-up of work in college ensures continuity and emphasises the significance of the work to students.  Your careful tracking and monitoring of students’ progress and achievements clearly identifies the positive impact of alternative provision in developing personal skills, gains in confidence and self-esteem, reducing incidents in college and motivating young people to continue learning.  Students are positive about their experiences. They speak confidently about the skills they are developing and the influence their involvement has on future pathways after college. Notably, all three students on the

p.2

Strengths of this aspect of the school’s work

‘Engage’ programme have secured post-16 courses for next year.

p.2

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include:

 ensuring that all providers are provided with written information regarding the college’s expectations of safeguarding and that governors take account of off-site provision when reviewing safeguarding procedures.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion