Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 9 Jun 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Paul Chambers

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Paul Chambers

  • Postcode verified

    WN8 9TG

Page 2 of 3
Page 2 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+58Positivemore positive than 56% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivestrongpositiveeffectivelyconsistentlyimprovingconsistentclear
Criticismlowerbelownot clearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Full report text

CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 1231231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566933 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: ggleaden@cfbt.com

p.1

Ms Lynne Slater Headteacher Lea Community Primary School Greavestown Lane Lea Preston Lancashire PR2 1PD

p.1

School, Lancashire

Following my visit with Eileen Mulgrew Her Majesty's Inspector to your school on 12 May 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Education, Children's Services and Skills to report on the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School, Lancashire

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in February 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School, Lancashire

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you, a group of pupils, two members of the governing body and two representatives of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I evaluated the school’s improvement plan and reviewed other documentation supplied by the school. I undertook a learning walk, accompanied by you and another member of staff, to observe pupils in their lessons.

p.1

Context

Since the section 5 inspection in February, an acting assistant headteacher has left the school after gaining promotion. Two governors have resigned owing to other commitments.

p.1

Main findings

You, and other leaders including governors, accept that the areas for improvement identified at the February 2014 inspection are appropriate and helpful areas to develop the school. The school’s improvement plan focuses on suitable actions aimed at developing provision. While the school has targets for pupils’ achievement, these are not clearly linked with the actions detailed in the improvement plan.

p.1

Main findings

The school has introduced a range of measures aimed at improving provision and outcomes. For example, after identifying that not enough pupils were arriving in school on time, an initiative to improve pupils’ punctuality at the beginning of the school day has, to date, had a positive impact. Steps to develop teaching and learning include an external review from the local authority and this has provided evidence of improvements in the quality of teaching. A recently introduced programme to use testing to identify where interventions can be targeted more effectively has not had sufficient time to show impact. Pupils believe that teachers’ more consistent application of the school’s behaviour policy is helping to improve behaviour in lessons and attitudes to work.

p.2

Main findings

The role of teaching assistants has been reviewed and job descriptions made clearer. The school has introduced a training programme to develop the role of teaching assistants and, as a result, they are providing more effective support to pupils. For example, additional planning time before and after school is allowing teaching assistants opportunities to discuss with teachers the learning needs of pupils in forthcoming lessons.

p.2

Main findings

Teachers are now more aware of the need to provide appropriate levels of challenge to pupils of all abilities. However, this remains an area for further development particularly in the teaching of mathematics. While teachers are beginning to ensure that more mathematical tasks involve solving problems, they need to be careful that problem solving is not seen as an extension activity that only the faster workers get on to.

p.2

Main findings

The need to improve pupils’ achievement in writing remains a key priority for the school. Actions to address this, such as ensuring that pupils have regular opportunities to write at length, have begun to improve the quality of pupils’ writing. However, the school’s data suggest that achievement in writing remains lower in relation to targets than achievement in other areas. The school has a strengthened marking policy and leaders are working to ensure that all members of staff apply it consistently. Inspection evidence identified some examples of good marking and feedback that indicates to pupils how they can improve.

p.2

Main findings

The school has begun the process of strengthening subject leadership. A newly appointed deputy headteacher, due to take up post in June, will have responsibility for mathematics. Subject leadership in English is currently under review. The process to review the use of the pupil premium has begun. An internal review has identified ways that the funding can be used more efficiently; the external review, involving the local authority, is due to take place in June.

p.2

Main findings

Governors have a clear idea of where the school is strong and where it needs to improve. A newly formed sub-committee focuses specifically on how the school implements its improvement plan. Some governors have undertaken additional training in safeguarding. After undertaking a skills audit, governors are now in a stronger position to make best use of the skills that they have. Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The local authority has identified that the school needs additional support and has made additional contact hours available. Local authority officers have reviewed the improvement plan and undertaken a review of teaching in the school. They have supported the school in the appointment of a new deputy headteacher and in organising links with staff in other local schools.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children's Services for Lancashire and as below.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion