Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Heather Yaxley
- Postcode verified
PE30 3LJ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- This must be addressed as a matter of urgency because these issues are taking up too much of your time and of others, and could slow the implementation of the action plan if not resolved in time for the next academic year. p.3
- Although you and the Chair of the Governing Body are generally happy with the advice from the local authority’s human resources service, you are not getting the advice quickly enough to help you take the action that you need to resolve some of the current concerns. p.3
- The school should take further action to: p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 894
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 48, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 23 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Joanne Davenport Headteacher South Wootton Infant School 9 Church Lane South Wootton King’s Lynn Norfolk PE30 3LJ
p.1
Infant School
Following my visit to your school on 16 May 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Infant School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in March 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Infant School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.1
Infant School
refine the action plan to make sure that success is easily measured against a range of criteria for good teaching and learning.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with you and leaders for literacy, mathematics and special educational needs. I met with the Chair of the Governing Body and four other governors, and the school’s adviser from the local authority to discuss the action taken since the previous inspection. The action plan was evaluated.
p.1
Context
Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 6799169 Direct email : mathew.mitchell@serco.com There have been no changes to staffing or the governing body since the March inspection. The school has very recently joined the local authority’s N2GG (Norfolk to Good and Great) programme.
p.1
Main findings
It remains the case that two of the six classes are taught by supply teachers or by you because of the long-term absence of two teachers. Nevertheless, this has not stopped you, the three leaders and the governing body taking the appropriate steps to address the points for improvement from the inspection. The Chair of the Governing Body quickly arranged for an external review of governance and this will take place next week. The action plan has already been reviewed to reflect the inspection findings. It sets out a suitable range of actions to take over the next academic year, with the intention of making sure that pupils make at least good progress from their starting points by the summer term in 2015. The plan states the broad aims for pupils’ good progress and good teaching but lacks detailed descriptions for what to look for when monitoring progress towards these goals. The action plan sensibly supports the main priorities while supplementing the broader
p.2
Main findings
strategic improvement plan. Similarly, the action plan is supported by separate action plans for literacy, mathematics and special educational needs. An action plan for the Governing Body will follow the review of governance. The Chair of the Governing Body is discussing with you and governors about how to make the best use of governors’ time in monitoring the action plan. Omissions on the school’s website as identified in the inspection report have been resolved and a governor now takes responsibility for making sure that all is up-to-date.
p.2
Main findings
Leaders for literacy, mathematics and special educational needs are clear about their roles and responsibilities. Despite pressures on their time because of staff absence, they remain very committed to improving their leadership skills and use the time that they have wisely. You have made sure that they have the time to go to meetings with colleagues in local schools and this helps them to maintain their strategic responsibilities and to reflect on their practice.
p.2
Main findings
In response to the inspection report, and as we saw when we toured the classrooms, teachers have already given a lot of thought to enthusing pupils to write creatively. In addition, there are good displays of pupils’ work and useful prompts to help pupils with their writing. To make sure that pupils, especially the boys, improve their writing systematically in Year 1, the timetable from September will include more frequent, well-planned opportunities to teach writing skills
p.2
Main findings
In consultation with the local authority’s leader, you have recently joined the N2GG programme. The first part of the support will take place later next week, focusing appropriately on enhancing the work of support staff.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
Although you and the Chair of the Governing Body are generally happy with the advice from the local authority’s human resources service, you are not getting the advice quickly enough to help you take the action that you need to resolve some of the current concerns. This must be addressed as a matter of urgency because these issues are taking up too much of your time and of others, and could slow the implementation of the action plan if not resolved in time for the next academic year.
p.3
External support
You and other leaders are very positive about the professional support from local authority advisers at meetings in your local cluster of schools. However, the Chair of the Governing Body is quite rightly displeased that meetings for governors are sometimes cancelled at short notice because of a lack of participants.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Norfolk.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion