Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by London Borough of Southwark in Southwark
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
12 Mar 2014
- Inspectors verified
Patrick Sullivan
- URN verified
SC031479
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection. p.3
- The recommendation concerning access to the internet will be addressed once the service moves to its temporary location but at this point in time is not met. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 706
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC031479 Inspection date 12/03/2014 Inspector Patrick Sullivan Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 31/07/2013 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Brief description of the service
This is a local authority service. It provides short breaks for up to five children who have learning and/or physical disabilities.
p.3
Brief description of the service
The children’s respite service shares the building with a similar service for adults. The services are kept separate by locked doors, but some facilities are shared. One manager is registered for both children's and adults' services. Staff also work across both provisions. The adult service is inspected separately by the Care Quality Commission.
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress .
p.3
Progress
At the last full inspection of the service in July 2014 the overall effectiveness was judged to be good.
p.3
Progress
Since the last inspection a new manager is in place and is applying to be the Registered Manager. He has a number of ideas on how to develop the service and has already put in place a number of improvements.
p.3
Progress
Two requirements and two recommendations were made at the last inspection. One recommendation has not been met. This is due to the imminent move to temporary premises while the existing building undergoes a major refurbishment. On this basis the service is judged to be making good progress. The first requirement relates to updating the Statement of Purpose. The service currently has a new and updated Statement of Purpose which is very detailed and refers to relevant policies and procedures.
p.3
Progress
The second requirement was to ensure that all staff receive appropriate supervision. As part of the inspection supervision records were checked and this is now occurring on a much more regular basis. The manager has put in place a supervision monitoring form and has also devised a more detailed supervision recording form.
p.4
Progress
The first recommendation relates to staff training. A comprehensive training schedule is in place for staff and individual training needs are addressed and recorded in supervision.
p.4
Progress
The recommendation concerning access to the internet will be addressed once the service moves to its temporary location but at this point in time is not met.
p.4
Progress
The service has a stable staff team who are able to provide consistent care to the young people who use the service. They are led by a competent able manager who has a clear vision of where he wants the service to go and how he can expand and improve the current level of service. This vision is reflected in the service development plan which outlines in detail the work required to improve the service.
p.4
Progress
Currently the service is restricted by the existing building and the limitations this places on what can be offered. The home is well maintained and in a good state of decoration. The bedrooms are clean and well decorated if somewhat bare and impersonal.
p.4
Progress
The policies and procedures of the home are in good order with the exception of the 'additional measures of control' book which is lacking a section indicating if the young person is offered medical treatment following a restraint.
p.4
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):
p.4
Recommendations
the 'additional measures of control' book should contain a section where it is clearly recorded that the young person has been offered access to medical assistance (NMS 3.16)
p.4
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.5
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion