Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

The Little Gonerby Church of England Primary Academy, Grantham

Inspected 8 May 2014 · published 5 Jun 2014 · URN 138816

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    8 May 2014

  • Inspectors verified

    James Fuller, Ruth McFarlane

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    NG31 9AZ

  • Name on report verified

    The Little Gonerby Church of England Infant School, Grantham

  • URN verified

    138816

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood
  • Leadership and managementGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+40Positivemore positive than 8% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingexceptionallyimprovedeffectivelyvery wellstrongsafeeffective
Criticismweaknessesnot alwaysinadequategapsrequires improvementseriousweakerfalling behind

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improveLeadership positive critical
  • Findings1359w+44
  • Leadership784w+30
  • What needs to improve94w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,156
shorter than usual (typical 2966)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 48
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 45%Leadership 26%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 25%

Full report text

The Little Gonerby Church of England Infant School, Grantham Sandon Road, Grantham, NG31 9AZ

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Not previously inspected This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of pupils Good 2 Quality of teaching Good 2 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

This is a good school.  Since the academy opened, strong leadership and governance have secured good teaching and learning.  Children in the Early Years Foundation Stage get off to a good start because they are well taught.  Across the school, pupils of different abilities, including the most-able, achieve well, especially in reading and writing.  Teaching is good. The way subjects are linked makes for vibrant and innovative learning and promotes pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development exceptionally well.  The school’s work to keep pupils safe is outstanding. All the parents who offered a view agree that the school keeps their child safe.  Pupils’ eagerness to learn and their good behaviour make a strong contribution to their learning.  Leaders and governors keep a very thorough check on teaching and learning and take effective action to tackle weaknesses.  The school’s participation in the Teaching

p.1

Summary of key findings for parents and pupils

Alliance has helped bring benefits to pupils’ achievement and has improved the impact of leadership and teaching.

p.1

It is not yet an outstanding school because

 The way ‘themed’ learning is planned does not allow pupils’ mathematical skills to develop as quickly as they should.  Teaching does not always ensure that pupils are required to think logically or really hard .  Pupils do not always know how to take the next steps in their learning. Inspection report: The Little Gonerby Church of England Infant School, Grantham, 7–8 May 2014 2 of 10

p.1

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors visited 16 lessons taught by seven teachers. Two were joint observations with the headteacher.  Inspectors talked to pupils about their work. They listened to individual pupils read. A meeting was held with members of the school council.  Meetings were held with the Chair and other members of the governing body, with members of the senior and middle leadership teams and with the leader of the Teaching Alliance.  A wide range of documents were studied, including those relating to the school’s self-evaluation and development planning, pupils’ progress data, monitoring of teaching and learning, as well as records relating to behaviour, safeguarding and attendance.  Inspectors took account of the 21 staff questionnaires returned.

p.2

Inspection team

Ruth McFarlane, Lead inspector Additional Inspector James Fuller Additional Inspector Inspection report: The Little Gonerby Church of England Infant School, Grantham, 7–8 May 2014 3 of 10

p.2

Information about this school

 This is a smaller than average school of its type. It converted to academy status in October 2012. When its predecessor school was last inspected in 2009, its overall effectiveness was judged to be good.  The proportion of pupils known to be eligible for the pupil premium funding is below the national average. The pupil premium is additional funding provided for pupils who are known to be eligible for free school meals and those in local authority care.  A below-average proportion of pupils is from minority ethnic groups, or speak English as an additional language. Since the academy opened, the proportion of pupils from Eastern European countries has increased.  The proportion of disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs supported at school action is below average. The proportion of pupils supported at school action plus or who have a statement of special educational needs is also below average.

p.3

Information about this school

 Since converting to academy status, the school has become part of the EOS Teaching Alliance, which operates across four continents from its headquarters in Lincolnshire. The headteacher is the lead for the group’s research and development.  The governing body has recently reorganised under a new Chair.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Accelerate pupils’ progress in mathematics by:  providing more thorough coverage of the skills and concepts set out in the required programme of study  placing more emphasis on the development of pupils’ calculation and problem-solving skills.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Make more of the teaching outstanding by ensuring that:  the questions teachers use to check pupils’ understanding encourage them to think logically and really hard at all times  pupils always understand how to improve their work. Inspection report: The Little Gonerby Church of England Infant School, Grantham, 7–8 May 2014 4 of 10

p.3

The achievement of pupils is good

 Children get off to a particularly good start in the Reception classes, where a significant proportion enters with skills below the levels typical for their age. Most make good progress. On entry to Year 1, more reach a good level of development than is the case nationally.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Since the school became an academy, pupils have made consistently good progress in Key Stage 1, in reading, writing and mathematics and in other subjects. Attainment at the end of Year 2 was broadly average in 2013 and is securely on track to improve further this year.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 In the 2013 national Year 1 check on phonics (letters and the sounds they make) an above- average proportion of pupils reached the required standard. Pupils develop their knowledge of phonics through a systematic programme which promotes both speaking and listening skills and reading and writing effectively. Pupils’ writing is often lively and imaginative.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Pupils read well because the school works in close partnership with parents to foster a love of reading. Pupils read at home as well as at school, and this makes a valuable contribution to their learning. Current standards in reading are above those expected for pupils of this age. More-able pupils read challenging books and weaker readers know how to draw on appropriate strategies to help them to work out how to read words and understand texts.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs make good progress. This is because their needs are identified early, their progress is monitored and additional support is provided to help them learn.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Gaps in the attainment between pupils who are in receipt of the pupil premium and other pupils are closing rapidly across the school because funds are being used effectively to raise standards. In 2013, although the progress of eligible pupils’ was good, their attainment in both English and mathematics was generally below that of their classmates. However, there is no national progress data for Key Stage 1 so the precise gap cannot be quantified. Current assessment information held in the school shows that standards for all eligible pupils in 2014 are expected to be higher and that gaps between these pupils and the others will be much smaller than last year.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 The positive impact of the use of sports funding is already clearly evident in pupils’ good awareness of the importance of physical health and their keen interest, enthusiasm and skills in, for example, rugby, gymnastics and dance.

p.4

The achievement of pupils is good

 Pupils’ progress in mathematics is not quite as good as it is in other subjects. Their skills in calculation and logical thinking are not as confident as they should be and pupils sometimes struggle to apply their skills to solve problems.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 In the Early Years Foundation Stage, staff provide exciting, challenging activities to help children learn. The tasks children are set are very effective in helping them progress rapidly and they make good use of the resources available both indoors and outdoors.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 The specific focus given to the teaching of phonics (the sounds that letters represent) helps teachers of older pupils to build on the good start pupils are given when developing early language skills. The quality of teaching is particularly good in reading, because staff have benefited from good quality training in this area during the last year.

p.4

The quality of teaching is good

 Teaching assistants are often used very well to support small groups in class and help individual pupils to develop their learning skills. They provide a good level of support for disabled pupils and those who have special educational needs.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Teachers maintain strong relationships with pupils, based on mutual respect. They praise achievement when deserved and help sensitively when pupils experience difficulty in learning. Consequently, pupils are courteous, strive to improve their work and show respect for others.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Homework often provides a good supplement for classwork and pupils readily explain how homework has helped them understand the topics and tasks they do in school. For example, in Year 2, pupils had researched at home to find words to describe ‘night’ to help their classwork on description.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Teachers set pupils targets for each lesson, using a well-understood school system that incorporates progressively harder challenges. This works well. However, pupils are not always sure what they need to do to reach the next level in their work over the longer term.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 Teachers question pupils to check their understanding and to extend learning, but with mixed success. At its best teachers use probing questions to deepen learning and help pupils explain their thinking. However, sometimes, questions only require a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ answer, limiting their value and effectiveness.

p.5

The quality of teaching is good

 The school’s use of ‘themed’ learning, which forms the bulk of the timetable, is popular and inspires sustained interest in learning, especially among boys, who had been falling behind the girls. However, the chosen themes do not always give sufficient emphasis to the development of key concepts and skills in mathematics, or teach pupils how to calculate or solve problems accurately and efficiently.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 The behaviour of pupils is good. Pupils are eager to learn and listen well in lessons, readily asking questions and showing curiosity and inquisitiveness.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Attendance has risen recently and is now above average. The percentage of pupils who are absent frequently was high last year, but it has fallen dramatically as a result of the efforts made by the school. There is a new keenness evident across all age-groups to attend school regularly and enjoy the vibrant new curriculum it is offering.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 Pupils are polite and welcoming to visitors. They show good manners and respectful consideration to one another and to all the adults.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 In the playground, pupils are ready to take turns, and are carefully supervised. Pupils told inspectors that the good behaviour seen in and around the school was typical.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 The school’s work to keep pupils safe and secure is outstanding. The school keeps pupils safe and helps them to understand how to keep themselves safe, for instance on roads or near water.  Pupils told inspectors that when bullying happens, they know they can turn to any adult in school for help, and are confident that any concerns will be quickly dealt with. They have a mature understanding of the types of bullying children of their age might encounter.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 All the parents who responded to Parent View or who spoke to inspectors believe their child is safe at the school.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The headteacher and senior leaders share a determination that the school will continue to improve and know exactly what is needed for this to happen. All staff, not only those with assigned leadership responsibilities, work effectively together for the benefit of the pupils.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Leaders have introduced several initiatives that have improved the school. These include the system introduced for tracking pupils’ progress, the improved teaching of phonics and pupils’ subsequent improvements in reading standards. These demonstrate that the school has the capacity to continue to improve.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Leaders’ checks on teaching are thorough and are underpinned by work with the Teaching Alliance. This has enabled teachers to share expertise and improve their skills, and thereby, pupils’ achievement. The school has effective procedures for managing staff performance and ensures that decisions about teachers’ movement up the pay scale are linked to the quality of their teaching and their effectiveness.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Subjects are taught through a recently introduced framework of themed learning that promotes spiritual, moral, social and cultural development exceptionally well, and requires pupils to interact and cooperate together in their learning. Subject leaders have been quick to spot ‘teething troubles’ in the system and are beginning to set about improving planning, especially for mathematics. The many additional group activities, such as cheer leading, gymnastics and cookery, enrich pupils’ learning and enhance the inclusive and ‘fun’ atmosphere of the school.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Good use is being made of the primary school sports funding to improve the quality of physical education, to promote healthy lifestyles for pupils and to make use of specialist partners. Pupils are particularly enthusiastic about the ‘virtual’ competition, which allows sports competition between schools without leaving the school grounds, and includes ‘Speed Bounce’, ‘ZigZag Running’, ‘Bean Bag Shuttles’ and ‘Agility Run’.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The school’s work with the Teaching Alliance is extensive. Pupils and staff benefit from the exposure to ideas and practice from the very broad range of different schools. Through its links with the Alliance, the school is able to ensure pupils develop a good understanding of the different cultures and religions in modern Britain and elsewhere.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 Pupil premium fund spending is reducing gaps in performance. Rigorous evaluation of its effectiveness by leaders ensures good value for money. The appointment of a parent support adviser has led to improved rates of attendance. Small group interventions help accelerate progress for those eligible. This work, and similar interventions for disabled pupils and those with special educational needs, ensures equality of opportunity for all pupils.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The governance of the school:  The recently re-organised governing body supports and challenges school leaders effectively. The vision and commitment of the governors, for instance through support for participation in the Teaching Alliance, is reaping rewards for pupils.  Governors carry out their statutory responsibilities meticulously, including for safeguarding. They undertake appropriate training. They visit the school regularly and demonstrate a commitment to improving outcomes for the pupils.  Governors play a key role in checking the work of the school. They have a clear understanding of the school’s strengths and weaknesses. They use achievement information well. They ask probing questions, for instance about the impact of the spending of pupil premium funding.  Governors understand how the performance of teachers is managed and how teachers are rewarded based on their effectiveness. Inspection report: The Little Gonerby Church of England Infant School, Grantham, 7–8 May 2014 8 of 10

p.6

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. Inspection report: The Little Gonerby Church of England Infant School, Grantham, 7–8 May 2014 9 of 10

p.8

School details

Unique reference number 138816 Local authority Lincolnshire Inspection number 440162

p.9

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.9

School details

Type of school Academy converter School category Non-maintained Age range of pupils 4–7 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 173 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair Clare Allen Headteacher Helen Hilton Date of previous school inspection N/A Telephone number 01476 564112 Email address enquiries@little-gonerby.lincs.sch.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.10

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work-based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.10

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.10

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion