Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 4 Jun 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Deborah James

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Deborah James

  • Postcode verified

    WS2 9UA

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+60Positivemore positive than 58% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveimprovedstronglyconsistentimprovingsecure
Criticismrequires improvement

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings173w0
  • Leadership586w+60

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Full report text

Mr Patrick Ottley-O’Connor Principal West Walsall E-ACT Academy Primley Avenue Walsall WS2 9UA

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of West Walsall E-ACT Academy

Following my visit to your academy on 7 May, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the academy’s recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of West Walsall E-ACT Academy

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the academy became subject to special measures following the inspection which took place in January 2014.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, meetings were held with the interim Principal, the Principal designate, senior leaders, the Chair of the Governing Body and a representative of the sponsor. The sponsor’s statement of action and the academy’s improvement plan were evaluated.

p.1

Context

Since the last inspection, the Principal has left the academy and an interim Principal is leading the academy until a new Principal takes up her position in September. A new Vice-Principal has also been appointed. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 3115307 Direct email : rachel.evans@tribalgroup.com

p.1

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The sponsor’s statement of action and the academy improvement plan provide a detailed set of actions to be taken that cover all the priorities identified in the inspection report. Both documents use the same format and each priority is broken down into small steps with measurable success criteria that make it easy for the sponsor and governors to track and monitor the impact of improvement activities.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The interim Principal has made an urgent start on implementing the actions identified following the inspection. There have been changes in leadership roles and additional leadership capacity has been brought into the academy. The interim Principal has focused on the implementation of a number of short, sharp measures that have had an immediate impact on the academy and been effective in developing a common vision for academy improvement among staff and students. These include:

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

 improvement in student behaviour through the consistent application of rules on standards of uniform, a ban on the use of mobile phones during lessons and a reduction in lateness to lessons  introduction of the West Walsall Way as an agreed set of minimum standards for lessons  a thorough review of teaching and the introduction of teacher support plans where teaching requires improvement  increased opportunities for staff to participate in programmes to improve the quality of their teaching and leadership  improved information tracking systems that give middle leaders a valuable insight into students’ progress enabling them to make better decisions about which students need additional intervention  the introduction of more appropriate Key Stage 4 subjects for Year 9 students currently undertaking options choices.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Longer-term priorities, including a full review of the range of subjects on offer, further improvements to the quality of teaching and improving marking have begun. However, there is little information in the statement of action and the academy improvement plan on what specific actions will be taken next year around these aspects. This needs to be addressed by the sponsor, the governing body and the substantive Principal as a matter of urgency to ensure actions are distributed evenly through next year and all priorities are addressed.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Governors fully accept the issues identified in the report and are working closely with the interim Principal to improve their monitoring of the performance of the academy. A governor data dashboard has been developed to allow governors to track the progress against key indicators and an annual governance timetable has been drawn up to ensure regular monitoring of key areas. An external review of governance, including pupil premium spending, is planned for later this term.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The E-ACT education adviser has taken rapid action to secure additional support for the academy, arranging the appointment of the interim Principal and building a wider network of support from a local academy and regional education experts. She provides challenge to the Principal through regular meetings and has taken a role in the academy improvement work by participating in the review of teaching for example. She is a member of the raising achievement board (RAB) that meets every five weeks to evaluate the progress made by the academy.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The sponsor’s statement of action is fit for purpose

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The academy’s improvement plan is fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Having considered all the evidence I strongly recommend that the academy does not seek to appoint newly qualified teachers (NQTs).

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Walsall. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion