Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 4 Jun 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Christopher Moodie

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Christopher Moodie

  • Postcode verified

    IP27 0NJ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+13Mostly positivemore positive than 31% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexemplaryclearpositiveeffectiveimprovedproudconsistentlyrobust
Criticisminadequatepoorinconsistenciesinconsistenttoo many

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings261w0
  • Leadership609w+13

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
870
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
12%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 29%Leadership 68%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Alison Tilbrook Headteacher IES Breckland Crown Street Brandon IP27 0NJ

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of IES Breckland

Following my visit to your school on 7 May 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Special measures monitoring inspection of IES Breckland

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures following the inspection which took place on 21 January 2014.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, meetings were held with the headteacher, three members of the governing body, a representative of the trust, a representative of the sponsor and senior leaders. The sponsor’s statement of action and the school’s action plan were evaluated. You accompanied me on visits to several lessons where we observed teaching and looked at the quality of students’ work.

p.1

Context

There have been considerable staffing changes since the section 5 inspection in January 2014. Your appointment as headteacher took place shortly after the inspection. An assistant headteacher has recently taken up post. You have also appointed new heads of department in mathematics, science, English and design and technology. A new special educational needs coordinator is due to join the Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 01216 799164 Direct email : tim.ogbourn@serco.com school in the summer term. An additional science teacher will join the school in the autumn term. A number of temporary teachers have left the school since the inspection.

p.1

Context

The school’s sponsor continues to be IES (International English Schools UK).

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

You have introduced a range of monitoring activities that have enabled you and your senior leadership team to gain a clear understanding of the challenges facing the school. You are devoting time to finding out where the most urgent improvements in teaching are needed. You are making good use of external resources, including Suffolk Local Authority’s advisors, to provide teachers with individually tailored support plans which is leading to improvements. These improvements in teaching have had a positive impact on behaviour; in most lessons students focus on their work and learn in a calm and orderly manner. On occasion, their concentration drifts and important learning time is lost.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made: The sponsor’s statement of action is fit for purpose

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The statement of action accurately identifies the key priorities for improvement. Its focus on strengthening the leadership of the school through appointing new staff has contributed to the progress already made. IES representatives are monitoring the implementation of the school’s plans on a fortnightly basis and are now working in a more effective partnership with the school’s leadership and its governing body.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school’s improvement plan is fit for purpose.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

You have already taken action to improve the quality of teaching. Much more work is needed but improvements have begun. The quality of marking, for example, has improved and students are receiving regular feedback in some of their lessons. Inconsistencies remain, however, and marking continues to be inadequate in some subjects because students’ work goes unmarked for long periods of time. A similar picture is apparent in relation to the presentation of students’ work. In some lessons this is exemplary and students are clearly proud of their work. In other subjects books are uncared for and work is untidy, students draw graphs and charts with pens and poor standards of handwriting go unchecked. You have recently introduced a new marking and presentation policy to tackle this but not all staff have implemented it yet. Leaders have not checked that the marking policy is followed consistently enough and standards remain too varied. You have rightly identified

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

that teachers’ understanding of assessment is also inconsistent. It is clear from the scrutiny of students’ work that some teachers are inaccurately assessing, often over- stating, the quality of students’ work. You have identified this and it is in need of urgent intervention as it prevents the school from gaining a realistic understanding of students’ achievement. This, in turn, is limiting the capacity of teachers to provide work that suits the needs of different students. In too many classrooms, all students still do the same work, regardless of their abilities.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The governing body has responded to the outcomes of the inspection by creating working parties to monitor the impact of the school’s work. These meet twice per term and report to the full governing body. In addition, governors have received training to improve their understanding of school assessment data. Governors and senior staff have also been trained in child protection and safeguarding matters; systems and procedures in this area are much more robust. Governors are visiting the school more regularly and have begun to look at students’ work and visit lessons with senior leaders. As a result, they are better informed about the school’s work.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

An external review of the governing body is scheduled for late in the summer term.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Having considered all the evidence I strongly recommend that the school does not seek to appoint NQTs.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body, and the Chairman of IES UK. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion