Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Matthew Haynes
- Postcode verified
RH19 4DD
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance9
“Following her example, all leaders now contribute effectively to the school’s improvement.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 658
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 16 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Rhona Perry Headteacher The Meads Primary School Mill Way East Grinstead RH19 4DD
p.1
School
Following my visit to your school on 6 May 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
School
The visit was the second monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in January 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. HMI conducted an additional advisory visit in November 2013.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with you, other leaders, pupils and three governors. I conducted a telephone conversation with a representative of the local authority. A range of the school’s documentation was scrutinised including information about pupils’ current achievement. I made short visits to 11 lessons to see all of the pupils at work. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5307 Email : rachel.evans@tribalgroup.com
p.1
Context
Since the previous monitoring inspection in April 2013, three teachers have left and been replaced. Four governors have left the governing body and three have joined.
p.2
Main findings
The insistent and determined leadership of the headteacher has led to rapid improvements. Following her example, all leaders now contribute effectively to the school’s improvement. They hold teachers robustly to account for the quality of teaching and pupils’ achievement. Teaching is increasingly good or better because teachers’ expectations of pupils’ achievement have risen. Pupils are now given work that is hard enough. Teachers and other adults question pupils effectively, extending pupils’ thinking and checking their understanding. Pupils are given challenging individual targets which they use in lessons to focus their work. Teachers’ marking is frequent and detailed, and pupils respond to this feedback by making the necessary improvements to their work.
p.2
Main findings
As a result of better teaching, pupils’ progress has accelerated. The majority of pupils are now achieving well in reading and mathematics. Pupils apply and develop their mathematical skills in a range of subjects. Despite this, Year 6 pupils are not yet on track to make good progress from the beginning of Key Stage 2 because of slower progress in the past. Gaps between the achievement of pupils known to be eligible for the pupil premium and other pupils are closing rapidly. However, some variations in achievement persist. A minority of disabled pupils and those with special educational needs make slower progress than other pupils. Also, pupils achieve less well in writing in Years 1, 3, 4 and 5 than they do in reading and mathematics.
p.2
Main findings
Governors challenge leaders and teachers very effectively. They have an integral role in evaluating improvements, including gathering evidence themselves during regular visits to the school. They have a detailed knowledge of the school’s strengths and areas for development and they have made sure that the school has improved at the right rate. Governors have rightly sought and received a range of appropriate training, for example about using and interpreting data.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The local authority has provided effective support and challenge leading to a range of improvements. For example, work with middle leaders has improved their effectiveness. Additionally, support for particular teachers has helped improve their teaching so it is now good. Officers regularly check the progress the school is making, giving specific feedback and advice to school leaders. The level of the local authority’s involvement with the school, however, is now decreasing since leaders have demonstrated the ability to make the necessary improvements.
p.2
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for West Sussex.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion