Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Margaret Farrow
- Postcode verified
SR8 1NX
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Important actions include training for teachers and visits to see outstanding practice in other schools. p.2
- Additional lunch time supervisors have enabled better-use of the outside spaces during break and lunchtimes and they are successfully engaging pupils in more physical activities and games. p.2
- Governors and the local authority’s advisers are monitoring these changes and their reports show that a positive difference to pupils’ enjoyment is being made. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 862
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 39, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs Nicola Leyland Headteacher Shotton Hall Primary School Waveney Road Peterlee County Durham SR8 1NX
p.1
Primary School, Durham
Following my visit to your school on 8 May 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Primary School, Durham
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in January 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Primary School, Durham
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.1
Primary School, Durham
Improve the recording of behaviour incidents to include a clearer chronology of actions taken as a result of the incident and the outcomes of those actions.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit I held meetings with you, middle leaders, and three representatives of the governing body, a National Leader of Education from Wingate infant school who is supporting the school and an Education Development Partner from the local authority. I reviewed a range of documents including the school’s post-Ofsted action plan, governing body minutes, behaviour logs and records of lesson observations carried out by leaders in the school and the local authority. I also observed two part- lessons with you. CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 618 8524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566932 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: hcarnall@cfbt.com
p.1
Context
Shortly after the inspection an additional teacher and two lunch time supervisors were recruited. One other teacher resigned at the end of March 2014.
p.2
Main findings
Evidence from your monitoring of teaching, scrutiny of pupils books and lessons we observed together show that pupils progress is hastening across the school as a result of the urgent actions being taken following the inspection. Important actions include training for teachers and visits to see outstanding practice in other schools. Nonetheless, there are still some lessons where pupils’ progress is not rapid enough because the impact of teaching on pupils learning is not good enough. Short-term support plans have been put in place alongside one to one support for each member of staff. The number of teachers on support plans has reduced to two as a result of this well-targeted and effective work.
p.2
Main findings
Changes to behaviour management processes are being embedded effectively. Training has been delivered to ensure all staff apply the school’s policy consistently. Pupils were seen to behave well as they moved around school, in the dining hall and in the lessons we observed together. Additional lunch time supervisors have enabled better-use of the outside spaces during break and lunchtimes and they are successfully engaging pupils in more physical activities and games. Governors and the local authority’s advisers are monitoring these changes and their reports show that a positive difference to pupils’ enjoyment is being made. They are also proving to be effective in reducing the number of incidents of boisterous or poor behaviour at lunchtimes. You have changed the system for recording incidents. While the system records and dates each incident, it does not identify the precise actions taken following an incident, any follow-up work required or undertaken, or the impact of
p.2
Main findings
any actions in helping to minimise future incidents.
p.2
Main findings
Governors have developed their skills further and are vigilant in checking how well the school is improving. They have developed a specific monitoring group that meets regularly. They have increased their knowledge of what is happening in the school through more visits to monitor the school’s work first-hand, including behaviour walks, talking to pupils and observing lessons. They report that alongside the detailed tracking information they receive about pupils’ achievements and behaviour, they have independently observed the improvements in behaviour across the school and the better-progress pupils are making in class.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The local authority’s Education Development Partner and advisers have worked with the school successfully to support improvements in governors’ skills in monitoring the school’s work, the leadership of teaching, behaviour management, and developing more accurate assessments of pupils’ achievements in mathematics. Middle leaders quickly accessed training and guidance from local authority staff and the National Leader of Education, in improving their leadership roles in monitoring and evaluating teaching, lesson planning and pupils’ achievements. Middle leaders report they are held to account more effectively; evidencing improvements in teaching and pupils’ progress as measures of the impact of this work. There is still more to do to make sure all teaching is as good as the best. The work with external agencies and yourself, to develop the skills of middle leaders so then can robustly challenge any weaknesses in their areas of responsibility needs to continue.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s and Adults Services for Durham.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion