Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Mark Williams
- Postcode verified
LA3 2ST
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 748
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Paul Slater Headteacher Trumacar Nursery and Community Primary School Combermere Road Higher Heysham Morecambe Lancashire LA3 2ST
p.1
and Community Primary School, Lancashire
Following my visit to your school on 6 May 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
and Community Primary School, Lancashire
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in December 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
and Community Primary School, Lancashire
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to ensure:
p.1
and Community Primary School, Lancashire
records of teaching and learning, lesson observations and any scrutiny of work for example, focus on the learning made by pupils actions taken and the impact of those actions are always recorded.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with you, three members of your senior leadership team, four members of the Governing Body, and a representative of the local authority. We discussed the action taken since the last inspection. The school’s improvement plan was evaluated. In addition, I toured the school and looked at a sample of the monitoring undertaken by senior leaders.
p.1
Main findings
A sense of empowerment is evident. Your decision to delegate leadership across the school is beginning to pay dividends. Middle leaders – those responsible for the CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566939 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email : glankertis@cfbt.com different subjects in the school - are taking a more proactive role in checking the quality of teaching and learning in their subject areas. A clear cycle of monitoring is in place. As a result, these leaders are making use of strategies such as lesson observations, discussions with pupils, and scrutinising pupils’ work and teachers’ planning to identify successfully strengths and areas to develop. For example, the leader for science has identified correctly the need for skills to be taught and developed throughout the school so pupils become more adept at carrying out
p.1
Main findings
investigations. This developing leadership is providing you, your senior leaders and governors with an increasingly sharp picture of quality across the curriculum. We agreed, though, it could be sharper still. This is because records of lesson observations and any scrutiny of work are not always focused on the learning made by pupils. In addition, when actions are taken, following a lesson observation for example, there is not always a record of this or the difference such actions have made. This means while you and your leadership team can speak confidently about improvements, you cannot always show the evidence to support your judgements. I will provide support and challenge to you and your senior leaders in the Autumn of 2014 to help you sharpen up this area of your work.
p.2
Main findings
Governors continue to understand well the quality of teaching and learning in Key Stage 2, while improving, is still variable. As a result of their knowledge and understanding, they support and challenge you increasingly well. Your improvement plans are appropriate. Sometimes, though, the intended successes are not always clear. In addition, you all need to ensure your judgements about the quality of teaching are based on a range of evidence, not just on lesson observations alone.
p.2
Main findings
Following disappointing results in reading last year, the focus on this area has been renewed. Your records show results and rates of progress in reading for Year 6 pupils are expected to rise markedly in 2014. In writing your records show results are expected to be similar to those attained last year, but higher in mathematics.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The local authority has confidence in the ability of leaders and governors to improve the school. It knows the school well. It is supporting the development of middle leadership and the ability of such leaders to judge accurately the quality of teaching and learning through bespoke training planned for the summer term 2014.
p.2
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Lancashire.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion