Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Amanda Gard
- Postcode verified
ME15 7ND
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The newly created special educational needs team knows exactly what it needs to do to raise aspirations and standards. p.2
- Subject leaders for English understand the need to tackle underachievement. p.2
- The additional help for pupils to learn letters and sounds (phonics) is a useful way forward; leaders should think carefully in advance about the exact goals for such work to be able to check its success. p.2
- The school’s action plan identifies the key areas to work on and makes it clear who is responsible, what they need to do and the timeframe for action. p.2
- The targets for pupils’ attainment and progress are not ambitious enough to set the high expectations needed for all pupils to do as well as they should. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment7
“The newly appointed headteacher is ambitious for the school.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 758
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs Carol Brooker Headteacher Molehill Copse Primary School Hereford Road Maidstone ME15 7ND
p.1
School
Following my visit to your school on 1 May 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
School
The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses in December 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Evidence
During this inspection, meetings were held with: the headteacher; subject leaders for English; the attendance leader and family liaison officer; the special educational needs coordinator and deputy special educational needs coordinator; the Chair of the Management Board and the Regional Director of Education for the Academies Enterprise Trust. Brief visits were made to all classes. The academy’s statement of action and the school’s improvement plan were evaluated. The checks made on staff about their suitability to work with children were reviewed.
p.1
Context
Following a period of interim leadership from January to April a new substantive headteacher started at the school at the end of April 2014. The deputy headteacher Tribal 1–4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5307 Email : rachel.evans@tribalgroup.com is on long-term sick leave. A new governor has been appointed to the management board. A new special educational needs coordinator was appointed in January 2014.
p.1
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The newly appointed headteacher is ambitious for the school. Her vision to raise aspirations among pupils and parents and carers is shared by the staff and governors; they are excited and buoyant about the proposed ways forward.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The school’s action plan identifies the key areas to work on and makes it clear who is responsible, what they need to do and the timeframe for action. The plan has got off to a good start with the reorganisation of some classes to improve pupils’ learning.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The Academy Enterprise Trust’s statement of action includes all the areas for improvement from the school’s inspection. However, the organisation of the plan is muddled. It does not set out well enough who will lead the actions, what is hoped to be achieved, how progress towards goals will be checked and how this will be done. This means it is not a useful tool for governors and senior leaders to check how well the school is doing. The targets for pupils’ attainment and progress are not ambitious enough to set the high expectations needed for all pupils to do as well as they should.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The newly created special educational needs team knows exactly what it needs to do to raise aspirations and standards. For example, the team intends to involve teaching assistants in planning with teachers so they can support learning more effectively. The detail of how their aims will be achieved has yet to be decided but they are certainly on the right track.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
Subject leaders for English understand the need to tackle underachievement. The additional help for pupils to learn letters and sounds (phonics) is a useful way forward; leaders should think carefully in advance about the exact goals for such work to be able to check its success. The recent session for parents and carers to help their children with phonics was well attended and leaders sensibly plan to repeat this to develop support for children at home.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The attendance leader and family liaison officer are rightly highlighting to families the important links between attendance and learning. They have made a good start in developing new strategies to tackle persistent absence, such as questionnaires for parents, carers and pupils, but it is too early to see the impact of this work.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
Members of the management board understand the issues faced by the school and are fully committed to improvements. Governors’ valuable skills are not fully utilised to challenge and support the school because of weaknesses in the statement of action. The Academies Enterprise Trust has provided helpful support from consultants, for example to help Year 6 pupils prepare for the national tests in May. Successful schools within the chain are providing models of good practice. The impact of this support has not yet been assessed.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The school’s action plan is fit for purpose.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The academy’s statement of action is not fit for purpose.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Management Board, the Director of Children’s Services for Kent. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion