Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Mel Ford
- Postcode verified
DY11 5XQ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school should take further action to: p.1
- However, you now need to specify when monitoring of these will take place and how this will be done. p.2
- The role of governors in monitoring progress should be reflected in the plan. p.2
- Currently, not enough specific focus is given to this group in the improvement plan and this situation needs to be addressed as a matter of urgency. p.3
- Success criteria are in place, but these need to be supplemented with clear and regular milestones so that governors are able to monitor the school’s progress over a period of time. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,206
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 5
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 4%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Bryn Thomas Wolverley CofE Secondary School Blakeshall Lane Wolverley Kidderminster DY11 5XQ
p.1
Secondary School
Following my visit to your school on 12 May 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Secondary School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in February 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Secondary School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.1
Secondary School
ensure that actions identified in the school’s improvement plan have specific milestones so that governors are able to monitor the school’s progress accurately and effectively ensure that monitoring activities are specified by date and type strengthen the focus on the achievement of students eligible for pupil premium (pupil premium is additional funding for those students who are known to be eligible for free school meals, students from service families and those students looked after by the local authority) ensure that information about progress made by Key Stage 3 students is shared regularly with governors. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9146 Direct email : clare.benson@serco.com
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with you and other senior leaders, the head of sixth form, members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. A number of short visits were made to lessons and a range of information provided by the school was considered. The school improvement plan was evaluated.
p.2
Context
At the last inspection an acting headteacher and acting deputy were in place which remained the case until Easter when you joined the school as headteacher. Since then there has been an internal appointment to the senior leadership team.
p.2
Main findings
Although you have officially been in post for a very short time, you and the acting headteacher have worked closely and effectively together since January. As a result, effective actions have been taken so that improvement is building pace. School leaders and governors, although disappointed by the judgement made at the last inspection, have used the outcome to ‘kick start’ a comprehensive programme for improvement, some of which began before the inspection when the acting headteacher was appointed.
p.2
Main findings
The school’s improvement plan identifies priorities accurately. You have integrated the areas for improvement from the inspection into the wider school improvement plan very effectively. Actions are appropriately timed across a 12 month period. However, you now need to specify when monitoring of these will take place and how this will be done. Success criteria are in place, but these need to be supplemented with clear and regular milestones so that governors are able to monitor the school’s progress over a period of time. The role of governors in monitoring progress should be reflected in the plan.
p.2
Main findings
You have re-structured the leadership team for September, so that it more accurately reflects the size and ethos of the school. Roles and responsibilities have been allocated according to strengths and matched closely to the school’s priorities. This supports robust quality assurance of the school’s work. A further re-structure of the work of teaching assistants will be undertaken this term with a view to improving their impact on student achievement.
p.2
Main findings
A new whole school marking policy has been put in place. Although this is very new, early indications from quality assurance activities suggest that this is being consistently applied by all teachers. Students spoken to during the visit said that they liked the new system and felt that it gave them more information about how they could improve their work. The school has identified suitable opportunities for teaching staff to share and develop good practice. For instance, through the use of open door weeks when teachers identified as having particularly good skills in a focus area, invite others to observe their teaching. These are scheduled to occur throughout the school year. Good practice is also shared through subject leaders delivering training at twilight sessions and through support from a local teaching school with which you have made effective links to support further improvement.
p.2
Main findings
The new quality assurance programme has been well-received by staff and links closely with performance management, so that staff are very clear about their responsibilities to meet targets. Training has been provided for middle leaders so that they are more fully and consistently involved in the process. A strength of the programme is the published ‘follow up’ quality assurance calendar that shows exactly what steps will be taken by senior leaders following any quality assurance activity.
p.3
Main findings
The school’s own data suggests that progress and attainment overall is beginning to improve. However, the gap between students in receipt of pupil premium and others remains very wide and there is little sign of a reduction. Currently, not enough specific focus is given to this group in the improvement plan and this situation needs to be addressed as a matter of urgency. The school has identified this as an issue and has already commissioned a review of pupil premium use and impact by a National Leader of Education (NLE).
p.3
Main findings
Attendance in the sixth form is beginning to improve in lessons, although the school is aware that further improvement is required. You have re-organised the learning timetable for these students to support this. Due to low sixth form numbers you have forged a partnership with a local school for joint provision which will enable you to maintain the broad curriculum offer currently available. This will come into force in September.
p.3
Main findings
The governing body has been very proactive in identifying ways in which they can improve their own performance in order to better support and challenge the school. They have undertaken a skills audit and commissioned a review of their effectiveness. They are clear about the areas that need further development and have already taken steps to achieve this. For instance, they have re-organised their committee structure to match with senior leaders’ roles and responsibilities. Governors are very confident in the new leadership structure and report that they are a more integral part of the school’s programme for improvement than has been the case in the past. They say that they feel much more confident about questioning and challenging school leaders because of the quality of information they are provided with and because leaders are keen to be challenged.
p.3
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.3
External support
The local authority has provided appropriate support over a period of time before and since the recent inspection. This includes regular visits and reviews by the school improvement adviser to monitor progress.
p.4
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Worcestershire.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion