Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by London Borough of Hillingdon in Hillingdon

Inspected 26 Mar 2014 · published 23 May 2014 · URN SC032502

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Wilfried Maxfield

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    26 Mar 2014

  • Inspectors verified

    Wilfried Maxfield

  • URN verified

    SC032502

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+44Positivemore positive than 62% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisegood progressstronghighly effectiveoutstandingwell supportedeffectiveindependentstrength
Criticisminadequatefailednot metdeclinedconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings752w+44
  • What needs to improve48w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
795
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 50
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
2
typical 4
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 84%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 11%

Full report text

Unique reference number SC032502 Inspection date 26/03/2014 Inspector Wilfried Maxfield Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home

p.1

Date of last inspection 24/04/2013 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Brief description of the service

This is a children's home which is run by a local authority. It provides care for up to 13 children who may have emotional and behavioural difficulties.

p.3

The inspection judgements and what they mean

Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.

p.3

Progress

Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress .

p.3

Progress

At the last inspection in April 2013 the centre was judged as good for overall effectiveness. One recommendation for improvement was made. This has been met. This inspection found that the centre is making good progress. The management of the centre is able to demonstrate a strong commitment to maintaining and improving the already high standards of care. One recommendation has been made.

p.3

Progress

Outcomes for young people are good. The home provides young people with well- planned care. Young people's needs are constantly reviewed and discussed and care plans are updated in line with their individual development. A very professional and pro-active culture promotes outcomes for the young people. Current residents speak very highly of the benefits of their stay and their life at the centre. The majority of young people are unaccompanied asylum-seekers. They greatly benefit from staying at the centre and progress quickly during their stay. Staff support young people to develop emotionally and to become independent. All the young people are given outstanding levels of support to achieve their asylum-seeking status, independent living and future educational and professional pathways.

p.3

Progress

Young people are provided with good educational opportunities and facilities inside and outside of the centre. Young people are very complimentary about the support given to them. One young person stated, 'I have learned so much since I am here. As well as learning the language I am also given so many other opportunities to learn and do. Because of all the support I now know what and who I want to be one day.'

p.3

Progress

Consultation with young people is a strength of the centre. Young people are consulted in many different ways and their views and wishes are listened to. A highly effective link worker system provides young people with a positive, stable and supportive partnership with a member of the staff team. A well supported weekly residents' meeting provides a platform to voice concerns and raise issues that are significant. Staff build effective relationships with external agencies and ensure that the young people receive the support they need. All of the young people have access to an advocacy service.

p.4

Progress

The centre's Statement of Purpose is reviewed regularly. The services, aims and objectives are clearly outlined. However, a number of inaccuracies are contained within the current document. Young people understand the services that are available to them. The young people's guide provides information about the facilities available and is translated into many languages.

p.4

Progress

Young people benefit from a very experienced and committed group of staff. Staff and managers at the centre continue to demonstrate a strong commitment to develop and to improve the service provision. The registered manager provides the home with effective leadership, is well qualified and has a number of years of child care and management experience. Staff feel well supported.

p.4

Progress

Young people continue to be provided with a nurturing and safe environment. The premises are well furnished and in good decorative order. It provides young people with good facilities and is clean, tidy and comfortable. A good choice of resources encourages and supports meaningful activity and education focused learning. This inspection finds that good progress has been made overall to further enhance the quality of care and the outcomes for young people.

p.4

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):

p.4

Recommendations

 review the Statement of Purpose and the Children's Guide at least annually. Here in particular, ensure that the Statement of Purpose does not contain any factual inaccuracies (NMS 13.3)

p.4

About this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.

p.5

About this inspection

The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion