Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Stoke-on-Trent City Council in Stoke-on-Trent

Inspected 28 Mar 2014 · published 22 May 2014 · URN SC403895

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Michelle Spruce

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    28 Mar 2014

  • Inspectors verified

    Michelle Spruce

  • URN verified

    SC403895

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+0Mixedmore positive than 33% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisegood progressimprovedsafehappynurturingfeel safeclear
Criticisminadequatefailednot metdeclinedconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings510w+5
  • What needs to improve89w−33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
599
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 50
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 4
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 73%What needs to improve 13%About the inspection 14%

Full report text

Unique reference number SC403895 Inspection date 28/03/2014 Inspector Michelle Spruce Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home

p.1

Date of last inspection 18/12/2013 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Brief description of the service

This children's home is registered to provide care and accommodation for two young people of either gender with emotional and/or behavioural difficulties. The home is operated by the local authority.

p.3

The inspection judgements and what they mean

Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.

p.3

Progress

Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress .

p.3

Progress

At the last full inspection in December 2013, this home was judged to be good. Three requirements and two recommendations were made to promote improvement. Progress since the last inspection is good.

p.3

Progress

The manager has revised the Statement of Purpose and provided an amended copy to Ofsted. It now includes how parents and social workers can access the complaints procedure. This makes it easier for concerns or complaints to be raised.

p.3

Progress

Medication arrangements have improved. There is now a clear medication tracking sheet that has improved recording. Young people that self-medicate now have a risk assessment that ensures that they can take medication safely. This promotes independence and keeps young people safe.

p.3

Progress

Young people living at the home are happy and continue to do well in education and other aspects of their lives. They confirm the home provides a range of activities for them. Young people now access the community more independently. This improves their awareness of how to keep themselves safe. Staffing arrangements remain the same. This provides young people with stability and continuity. For example, staff know young people well enough to recognise changes in their behaviour that require support or intervention. A staff member said, ‘We have responded to her problems and also encouraged her to face them and work them out; this has improved her self-esteem and confidence’.

p.3

Progress

The manager continues to monitor the quality of care of the service the home provides. However, a review of the quality of care has not been provided to Ofsted in the required time. As a result, a requirement has been raised. The manager and staff team continue to provide a welcoming and nurturing environment where young people feel safe and cared for. This helps young people to develop sense of belonging.

p.4

Statutory Requirements

This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children's Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The registered person(s) must comply with the given timescales.

p.4

Reg. Requirement Due date

(2001) ensure the registered person shall supply to HMCI a report in respect of any review conducted by him and make a copy of the report available on request to placing authorities where the placing authority is not the parent of a child accommodated in the home. (Regulation 34(2)) 30/04/2014

p.4

About this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.

p.5

About this inspection

The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion