Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 21 May 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Diana Choulerton

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Diana Choulerton

  • Postcode verified

    ME10 1XN

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+84Very positivemore positive than 86% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectiveimprovingstrengthspositiveclearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings148w0
  • Leadership640w+84

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
788
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 18%Leadership 78%About the inspection 4%

Full report text

Mrs C Wood The Headteacher Westlands Primary School Homewood Avenue Sittingbourne ME10 1XN

p.1

School

Following my visit to your academy on 29 April 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the outcome and inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to have serious weaknesses in December 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection I met with you, your deputy headteacher, the Chair and Vice- Chair of the Governing Body, the Principal of The Swale Academies Trust and the executive headteacher of the trust’s primary schools. The trust’s statement of action and the academy’s action plan were evaluated. We briefly visited lessons around the school to see teaching and learning.

p.1

Context

There have been no major contextual changes since the previous inspection.

p.1

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5323 Email : suzy.smith@tribalgroup.com

p.1

PROTECT-INSPECTION

You, your senior leaders and governors are working with urgency and determination to bring about rapid improvement in your school. Your actions are clearly focused on tackling the key areas that need improvement. Your action plan includes appropriate targets and detailed descriptions of what will be achieved at key points in time. You are regularly and effectively evaluating the impact of your approaches against these and adjusting them when needed.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

The trust has recently established an executive board (EB), consisting of a small group of well-qualified and experienced governors who steer the work of the governing body. This has enabled a more intensive focus on improving the school. As a result you are being held to account more regularly and effectively. Work is underway to develop the skills of the main governing body. So far, this has included providing training on data and how to carry out effective governor monitoring visits to the school. An external review of the full governing body to identify areas of governance that still need further development is now underway.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Middle leaders are increasingly effective in checking the quality of teaching and the provision for which they are accountable. They use well focused activities such as book scrutiny, pupils’ conferences and pupils’ progress meetings to do this. They provide helpful feedback to teachers about their strengths and areas for development and support them to improve. This includes enabling them to observe and learn from existing good practice in the school. One example of the impact of this more effective middle leadership is the improvement in the provision for pupils eligible for pupil premium funding. The school’s data show that these pupils are now catching up with their peers.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Teaching has continued to improve since the last inspection. We saw evidence of this in the lessons visited. Pupils are now better motivated and more engaged in learning. Work is better matched to individual pupils’ ability. There is evidence of higher expectations for writing across the curriculum and of pupils editing and improving their written work. One pupil commented, ‘Things are much better this year because we work harder.’ The school’s data indicate that these developments are leading to improvements in pupils’ progress.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

You now communicate with parents more regularly and they have more opportunities to get involved in their children’s learning. They have been able to attend such things as phonics workshops and ‘Bug Club’ training to help them to do this. Your newly-established parents’ forum has enabled you to consult with parents more effectively. Your most recent progress review noted that parents were very positive about the school.

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Attendance has continued to improve since the previous inspection. The school is tracking attendance more closely and weekly attendance clinics have now been introduced for parents whose children are not attending school regularly enough. Initiatives, such as ‘March with a Mate’ which encourages and rewards the older

p.2

PROTECT-INSPECTION

pupils to take responsibility for getting themselves to school on time, have contributed to this continued improvement.

p.3

PROTECT-INSPECTION

The Swale Academies Trust knows and supports the school well. It has ensured that a range of expertise is available to you, in addition to that provided by the trust’s executive headteacher for primary schools. This includes opportunities to link with other schools and the support of an appropriately qualified consultant who carries out regular and helpful progress reviews.

p.3

PROTECT-INSPECTION

Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made.

p.3

PROTECT-INSPECTION

The school’s action plan is fit for purpose.

p.3

PROTECT-INSPECTION

The trust’s statement of action is fit for purpose.

p.3

PROTECT-INSPECTION

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body, and the Director of Children’s Services for Kent. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion