Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Deborah Pacquette in Waltham Forest

Inspected 27 Mar 2014 · published 21 May 2014 · URN SC007290

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Tola Akinde-Hummel

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    27 Mar 2014

  • Inspectors verified

    Tola Akinde-Hummel

  • URN verified

    SC007290

Page 1 of 7
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−72Very criticalmore positive than 5% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelygood progresseffectiveclear
Criticismlackfailedinadequatenot metbreachesdeclinedlacksinconsistencies

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings1030w−76
  • What needs to improve191w−5

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
7
Words of findings
1,214
about usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 50
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 4
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 78%What needs to improve 14%About the inspection 8%

Full report text

Unique reference number SC007290 Inspection date 27/03/2014 Inspector Tola Akinde-Hummel Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home

p.1

Date of last inspection 28/10/2013 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Brief description of the service

This is one of two privately owned children's homes in the area operated by the same provider. It provides accommodation and support to four young people of either sex, aged between 11 and 18 years old. The home is registered to care for young people with emotional or behavioural difficulties and young people with a mild mental disorder.

p.3

The inspection judgements and what they mean

Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.

p.3

Progress

Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making satisfactory progress .

p.3

Progress

The home had a full Ofsted inspection in October 2013. The overall effectiveness of the service was judged as good.

p.3

Progress

The previous inspection identified one requirement and one recommendation. The requirement came as a result of a lack of monitoring reports provided to Ofsted. The recommendation related to the clarity of children's records kept in the home.

p.3

Progress

The home has met the requirement. Monitoring reports are sent to Ofsted, outlining how they have addressed the needs of children and young people; they also record where they have made limited progress and give some explanations as to why and how the home intend to rectify this.

p.3

Progress

The recommendation has not been met. Some information about young people lacks detail and clear direction. Staff rely too heavily on verbal communication and case recording to determine how they work with young people.

p.3

Progress

Care plans are non- specific, relying on information recorded elsewhere and the assumption that the reader knows where to find the information. The care plans contain vague statements about how support will be offered but does not commit to a plan of action or include useful timescales to deliver the support. This may produce inconsistencies in the way staff assist young people.

p.4

Progress

Behaviour management plans and risk assessments do not sufficiently detail the level of risk associated with particular behaviour and how to effectively manage these. This could result in staff being unable to support young people or minimise known risks appropriately due to the lack of detail contained in key documents. The recent monitoring of these documents has highlighted this as an issue but these have yet to be amended.

p.4

Progress

The home have been unable to establish boundaries with young people. Despite having a number of written contracts, breaches of these do not result in any consequence for young people. The behaviour plans do not specify what types of sanctions the home might use to help modify behaviour. Therefore young people do not experience any consequences for their actions or reflect in any useful way on their behaviour. This means that staff lack any authority to influence effective change in young people.

p.4

Progress

As with the sister home, young people are reluctant to engage in education or training during their stay. The staff facilitate and work with professionals to access education, health and training opportunities. Routines in the home promote the opportunity for young people to attend education, leisure and medical appointments. Young people agree to attend initially then refuse to continue. The home has supported home tuition when mainstream resources have failed. Young people still remain demotivated despite rewards and incentives offered to support their participation.

p.4

Progress

Young people invest little in the placement and one young person spoken to is far from complimentary about the home and the staff. Another young person chose to return to the home, is making minimal effort to engage in services on offer but does communicate appropriately with staff when he is in the home.

p.4

Progress

Social work professionals believe that the home has made plenty of attempts to engage young people who also refuse to engage with all other services. Young people avoid contact with most figures of authority and want to be left alone. One social worker said, 'The home has been very good. I have no issue in respect of their commitment to the young people or their relationship with me.'

p.4

Progress

The home is predominantly staffed by women. The most recent placements have been young men. The staff are dealing with the challenging behaviour of some young people living there. There have been verbal threats, intimidation and an assault on staff and on one occasion; a visiting professional. The atmosphere in the home is tense and staff have some anxiety about working with particular young people. This has a direct impact on the ability to deliver the care and support required. The lack of a more gender-balanced team may have an impact on the behaviour of young people currently in the home.

p.4

Progress

The home appropriately notifies Ofsted and the network of professionals with regards to significant incidents concerning young people.

p.5

Progress

The staff team receive regular supervision and attend team meetings. Discussions focus on gaining a greater understanding of the needs of young people, raising the standard of care and working more effectively as a team.

p.5

Progress

The home's relationships with statutory and voluntary professionals is good and this promotes joined up thinking and working. One social worker said, 'I have been able to rely on them to do pieces of work that I have not been able to do myself.'

p.5

Progress

The décor in the home is functional and could benefit from modernising to make the environment more age appropriate, visually stimulating and welcoming for young people to live in.

p.5

Statutory Requirements

This section sets out the actions which must be taken so that the registered person/s meets the Care Standards Act 2000, Children's Homes Regulations 2001 and the National Minimum Standards. The registered person(s) must comply with the given timescales.

p.5

Reg. Requirement Due date

(2001) keep under review and where appropriate revise the behaviour management policy (Regulation 17 (2)) 30/05/2014

p.5

Reg. Requirement Due date

(2001) shall maintain in respect of each child who is accommodated in a children's home a record in permanent form which includes the information, documents and records specified in schedule 3 relating to that child (with specific reference to the home's care plans, individual behaviour plans and risk assessments) (Regulation 28 (1) (a), (b), (c)) 30/05/2014

p.5

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):

p.5

Recommendations

 ensure that sanctions and rewards for behaviour are clear, reasonable and are understood by staff and children. (NMS 3.8)  ensure that the home provides a comfortable and homely environment and is well maintained and decorated ( NMS 10.3)  ensure that the staff group who are day-to-day contact with the children includes staff of both genders wherever possible. (MNS 17.10).

p.5

About this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.

p.7

About this inspection

The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.

p.7

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion