Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Postcode verified
CO2 9QG
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Consequently, the school is making rapid progress towards becoming a good school. p.2
- The identified issue of slower progress for more able pupils and girls in mathematics is being addressed very well. p.2
- The work of local authority mathematics consultant is having a positive impact on classroom practice, such as better sequencing of activities to develop pupils’ mathematical skills, more effective use of working walls and staff paying careful attention to the timing of additional intervention to ensure that the learning of pupils receiving support is not disrupted. p.2
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school should take further action to: p.1
- You also need to specify the proportion of pupils making more than expected progress to reflect your key priority of accelerating progress for more able pupils. p.2
- are now used to check that pupils know what they need to do to improve through your ‘Think Pink’ strategy and ‘Steps to Success’. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 788
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Bill Aylett Headteacher Montgomery Junior School, Colchester Baronswood Way Colchester CO2 9QG
p.1
School, Colchester
Following my visit to your school on 29 April 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection. The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in January 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005. Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.1
School, Colchester
Review the timeline for teaching to be consistently good or better and specify the targets for pupils exceeding expected progress.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, I held meetings with you and the senior leadership team. I met three governors and spoke to the local authority Standards and Excellence Commissioner. I evaluated the school’s post-Ofsted action plan, looked at recent progress data and read a range of monitoring documentation. We carried out brief visits to lessons and spoke to teachers and pupils about their work.
p.1
Context
Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 01216 799154 Direct email : aidan.dunne@serco.com A Year 5 teacher, also subject leader for literacy, left the school at Easter. You reviewed staff deployment to ensure continuity for pupils and the special needs coordinator is teaching this class until the end of the Summer term. Three new members of staff will join the school in September 2014.
p.1
Main findings
Soon after the inspection, with the timely support of governors, you swiftly took action to address weaknesses. The strategies used to improve the leadership and teaching of mathematics and phonics are particularly effective. Consequently, the school is making rapid progress towards becoming a good school. The school’s improvement planning is clearly focused on accelerating pupils’ progress. Targets to improve the quality of teaching and for pupils to make expected progress are precise, although the timeline for teaching to be consistently good or better lacks urgency. You also need to specify the proportion of pupils making more than expected progress to reflect your key priority of accelerating progress for more able pupils. You have good systems in place to monitor the quality of teaching and, with the support of senior leaders, you frequently check that pupils’ learning and outcomes are being raised. As we visited classes, I noted that consistent approaches
p.2
Main findings
are now used to check that pupils know what they need to do to improve through your ‘Think Pink’ strategy and ‘Steps to Success’. These initiatives are already improving standards in writing and mathematics. The identified issue of slower progress for more able pupils and girls in mathematics is being addressed very well. Current data and predicted 2014 results appear stronger than in previous years. Governors took quick action to agree a post-Ofsted monitoring plan with the clear agenda of checking progress against the key issues identified at the inspection. They are keen to refine their skills further to help them gather objective evidence of improvements, independently of your senior leadership team. For this purpose, they are commissioning a review of governance to ensure that they have the necessary expertise to hold the school to account. Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support
p.2
Main findings
and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The local authority Standards and Excellence Commissioner provides effective support to the school. This includes signposting staff to best practice, identifying relevant courses to improve the quality of teaching and reviewing the effectiveness of your plans. The work of local authority mathematics consultant is having a positive impact on classroom practice, such as better sequencing of activities to develop pupils’ mathematical skills, more effective use of working walls and staff paying careful attention to the timing of additional intervention to ensure that the learning of pupils receiving support is not disrupted. The consultant’s notes of visits provide specific action points for subject leaders to drive improvement in mathematics. Links with other schools encourage staff to reflect on their practice, for example to improve the teaching of phonics or use ‘challenge packs’ to raise expectation of what pupils can achieve. You are developing partnerships with the
p.2
External support
local infant school to secure smooth transition from Year 2 to Year 3.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Essex.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion