Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Cheshire West and Chester Council in Cheshire West and Chester
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
25 Mar 2014
- Inspectors verified
Sue Winson
- URN verified
SC034849
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection. p.3
- For example, staff members ring schools to make sure that young people have their medication with them, and specific staff are responsible for medication booking in and following up of any errors or concerns on each shift. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- In particular that collected feedback from stakeholders is collated within the internal quality monitoring programme (NMS 21) p.4
- In particular that this includes refresher training in child protection; the particular vulnerabilities of children with disabilities, and the range of communication needs of children with disabilities. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Communication & language2
“Improved communication, handovers and shift planning benefit the young people.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 844
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 42, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC034849 Inspection date 25/03/2014 Inspector Sue Winson Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 11/12/2013 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Brief description of the service
The children's home is purpose-built and managed by a local authority. It provides short-break care for up to six children and young people with physical disabilities, learning disabilities and sensory impairment. It is appropriately adapted to address the needs of children and young people with these additional needs.
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress .
p.3
Progress
At the last full inspection in December 2013 the home was judged as adequate. The manager, who was appointed a short time prior to the last inspection, has been registered by Ofsted. Good progress has been made in addressing all of the three requirements made, and the majority of the seven recommendations. Following the joining together of 2 short break services, considerable progress has been made to improve planning and reviews to ensure that the needs of young people are met. The manager and team are committed to improving outcomes for young people, and their enjoyment of their short break stays.
p.3
Progress
Good planning ensures that young people’s needs and preferences, in regard to their care, are known to all staff. Reviews on all young people have taken place and their plans updated. Any further changes are now discussed in team meetings, and key workers have responsibility for ensuring that any actions are implemented. Health plans contain full details of young people’s needs, including for example, signs, triggers and symptoms. Staff have clear and specific information and know what to do if there are concerns. Young people benefit from the home working in conjunction with health specialists, including district nurses and young people’s own health teams.
p.3
Progress
Young people’s welfare is at the centre of staff practice. Detailed risk assessments and behaviour support plans outline how they can be kept safe. Considerable improvements in the arrangements for administration and monitoring of medication ensure that young people’s health needs are safeguarded. For example, staff members ring schools to make sure that young people have their medication with them, and specific staff are responsible for medication booking in and following up of any errors or concerns on each shift. Only staff members who are fully trained administer medication to the young people.
p.4
Progress
Consultation with young people and their parents or carers has taken place recently. This includes their views on the use of electronic monitoring of young people and parents have signed to agree their consent. Those young people who were not happy about electronic monitoring were given the option of visiting the home at times when its use was not necessary. Monitoring is only used in line with risk assessments, and its use is included in the homes’ Statement of Purpose which has been updated to reflect the services provided. Information is given to young people through the children’s guide. Information from consultations with young people, their parents or carers and involved professionals has yet to be collated in order to inform the homes’ development plan.
p.4
Progress
The manager and staff are committed to improving outcomes for young people and ensuring that they enjoy their short breaks. Improved communication, handovers and shift planning benefit the young people. Whilst some progress has been made in providing effective staff training, some of this remains a work in progress; for example, gaining agreement to commission specialist training relevant to children with disabilities and their specific needs. The home is well organised and efficiently managed. The manager monitors and audits the quality of care, acts on priorities and is in the process of compiling a development plan in consultation with staff.
p.4
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):
p.4
Recommendations
ensure that there are clear and effective procedures for monitoring the home. In particular that collected feedback from stakeholders is collated within the internal quality monitoring programme (NMS 21) ensure there is a good quality learning and development programme for staff. In particular that this includes refresher training in child protection; the particular vulnerabilities of children with disabilities, and the range of communication needs of children with disabilities. (NMS 18.1)
p.4
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.5
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion