Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Sarah Hubbard
- Postcode verified
MK18 1AT
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- ensure all governors have the opportunity to fully consider the revised improvement plan as soon as possible so that they can play an effective role in its monitoring and evaluation make sure that senior leaders are consistently rigorous in the way they hold middle leaders to account. p.1
- All members of the senior leadership team and some middle leaders have already visited an outstanding school. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- However the governors have only just seen the plan and consequently they are not yet clear enough about what they need to do individually to monitor its implementation and impact. p.2
- The school should take further action to: p.1
- The revised school improvement plan gives appropriate priority to the areas the school needs to improve. p.2
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 813
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 42, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Miss Angela Wells Headteacher The Buckingham School London Road Buckingham Buckinghamshire MK18 1AT
p.1
School
Following my visit to your school on 1 April 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in December 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.1
School
ensure all governors have the opportunity to fully consider the revised improvement plan as soon as possible so that they can play an effective role in its monitoring and evaluation make sure that senior leaders are consistently rigorous in the way they hold middle leaders to account.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with you, other leaders, the Chair of Governors, and a consultant leader from Buckinghamshire Learning Trust, to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The revised school improvement plan was evaluated. Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5307 Email : rachel.evans@tribalgroup.com I went on a tour with you, visiting the English, mathematics and science departments.
p.1
Context
The school is in the process of appointing an additional deputy headteacher with responsibility for achievement and the curriculum.
p.2
Main findings
You, your leaders and the Chair of Governors have shown determination to improve the school quickly. The revised school improvement plan gives appropriate priority to the areas the school needs to improve. You and your leaders review this plan regularly and you are making better use of information about students’ progress to ensure your judgements are accurate.
p.2
Main findings
You have rightly focused your attention on improving middle leadership. You are very clear about the crucial role senior leaders are having in improving the practice of the middle leaders they manage. You are using an external consultant to provide carefully tailored support for senior leaders to improve this aspect of their work. This is giving a clearer focus to the way that the senior team holds middle leaders to account for students’ achievement, including those who are supported by additional government funding (pupil premium). Senior leaders are using the information that tracks students’ progress to challenge middle leaders. They accompany middle leaders when they check students’ books and the quality of teaching, using this opportunity to ask penetrating questions. All these developments are starting to sharpen the way middle leaders approach their role. You have identified that this sharper approach is not yet consistent practice within your senior team. Where
p.2
Main findings
senior leaders are less robust in holding middle leaders to account, students’ achievement is often not as good. You have credible plans to resolve this inconsistency. In the meantime you have appropriately set up extra classes to ensure students access the support they need in the run up to external examinations.
p.2
Main findings
The Chair of Governors has been closely involved in drawing up the school’s plan for improvement. His educational knowledge and expertise have been used effectively to challenge leaders and train other governors. One of the governing body’s committees is now charged with examining students’ achievement to bring this into sharper focus. The recently revised school improvement plan clearly outlines the monitoring and evaluation that governors are scheduled to undertake. However the governors have only just seen the plan and consequently they are not yet clear enough about what they need to do individually to monitor its implementation and impact. It is important that governors now focus their attention on the key role they have in ensuring the plan works well and helps the school to become good within the timescale they have set. Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support
p.2
Main findings
and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.3
External support
You have brokered external support in careful consultation with the Buckinghamshire Learning Trust and the Chair of Governors. It has appropriately focused on the areas for improvement from the previous inspection report and involves a wide range of providers. All members of the senior leadership team and some middle leaders have already visited an outstanding school. Some middle leaders have used this as an opportunity to learn about good practice in their subject areas. You and your leaders are rightly checking if the external support is working and refining it where required.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Buckinghamshire and the Education Funding Agency.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion