Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Pathway Care Solutions Ltd 04004053 in Nottingham
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
20 Mar 2014
- Inspectors verified
Mark Ryder
- URN verified
SC029504
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Internal monitoring is very effective and consultation is used effective to enable young people, parents and other professionals to influence the development of the service. p.4
- This process has a direct positive impact on the quality of care and the outstanding outcomes that the young people experience. p.4
- At the last inspection this home was judged as outstanding with no recommendations or requirements made. p.3
- Young people say that the most positive aspect of living in this home is the caring and dedicated staff. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 717
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 47, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 5%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC029504 Inspection date 20/03/2014 Inspector Mark Ryder Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 20/11/2013 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Brief description of the service
This is a home that provides for young people with emotional and/or behavioural difficulties. It is registered to accommodate up to four children and young people. It is run by a private company.
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress .
p.3
Progress
At the last inspection this home was judged as outstanding with no recommendations or requirements made. Young people continue to be safeguarded and protected by a competent and well led staff team.
p.3
Progress
Staff promote effective and proportionate boundaries for young people to safely live within. A young person confirmed that they feel safe at this home and that the rules are fair. Risk assessments have been developed and reviewed in light of previous risk taking behaviour by young people. This has helped to reduce this type of behaviour.
p.3
Progress
Young people are kept safe if they go missing. The police are notified and arrangements made to check local areas. The level of such incidents has reduced of late. There is good and effective working relationships with local agencies, such as the police, that further promote the safety of young people. For example, the police visit the home frequently on an informal basis to maintain contact with staff and young people.
p.3
Progress
Young people say that the most positive aspect of living in this home is the caring and dedicated staff. Relationships between staff and young people are friendly and appropriate. Staff have a good understanding about the qualities they need to have in order to be effective in working with young people. Staff continue to be trained and supported to do their job well.
p.3
Progress
Monitoring of the home by leaders and managers provides clear evaluation as to both strengths and areas for improvement. Internal monitoring is very effective and consultation is used effective to enable young people, parents and other professionals to influence the development of the service. This process has a direct positive impact on the quality of care and the outstanding outcomes that the young people experience.
p.4
Progress
While monthly monitoring visits have been carried out by a senior member of the organisation, the latest report has not been sent to the home or to Ofsted within the specified time. Therefore, the Registered Manager could not share any findings from this visit with the staff. This, however, is an administrative error and has no bearing on the progress of this home.
p.4
Progress
The leaders and managers have a very good awareness of the direction they wish their home to go in. A comprehensive and user friendly development plan is in place, and this demonstrates the areas in which the home has improved. Young people are at the centre of this plan and they make a positive contribution to the home's development. For example, some young people are interested in gardening which has been taken on board and recently actioned.
p.4
Progress
As a consequence of this inspection one recommendation has been made. This recommendation does not relate to the welfare or safety of young people.
p.4
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):
p.4
Recommendations
ensure that a written report of a visit carried out under Regulation 33 is lodged in the home for the manager and staff to read and to respond. (NMS 21.8)
p.4
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.5
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion