Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by N H Care Limited in Birmingham

Inspected 28 Feb 2014 · published 8 May 2014 · URN SC365366

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

David Morgan

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    28 Feb 2014

  • Inspectors verified

    David Morgan

  • URN verified

    SC365366

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+16Mostly positivemore positive than 42% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisegood progresscleareffectiverigorouseffectivelyimprovedtimelypromptly
Criticisminadequatefailednot metdeclined

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspection positive critical
  • Findings684w+14
  • What needs to improve56w+20

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
737
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 50
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 4
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 81%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 12%

Full report text

Unique reference number SC365366 Inspection date 28/02/2014 Inspector David Morgan Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home

p.1

Date of last inspection 18/09/2013 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Brief description of the service

The home provides accommodation for up to three young people who have autism and is run by a private provider. One young person attends for school holidays only.

p.3

The inspection judgements and what they mean

Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.

p.3

Progress

Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress .

p.3

Progress

The last inspection was in September 2013 and found that the overall standard of care was adequate. Seven requirements and seven recommendations were made, which have all been addressed. There had been a substantial period of unsettled management at the home, which continued after the inspection. An internal appointment was made in late 2013 and that person was registered with Ofsted. She then resigned after a short period and another internal appointment was made; this registration with Ofsted is now underway. While these changes are acknowledged to be undesirable, they have had no negative impact on young people because the young people and staff know those concerned. The latest arrangement actually strengthens the service because it allows the manager to focus on one home rather than two, as in the previous arrangement; good progress is now being made.

p.3

Progress

The new manager is providing staff with clear and effective leadership. There is a rigorous focus on each young person's needs and their individual progress is routinely facilitated. This means, for example, that planning meetings about the operation of the home hinge on how young people will be involved. Options that do not maximise the benefits to young people are not used. This approach leads to young people making good progress. New admissions are undertaken effectively and there is good communication with families, social workers and other professionals. Young people's social skills improve, they are more healthy and they are able to make increasingly significant decisions. Clear improvements are being made in their use of public transport and facilities, such as shops. This increases young people's confidence and involvement in the community. Monitoring is thorough and the development plan targets are being addressed.

p.3

Progress

Young people continue to benefit from a high level of protection. No safeguarding issues have arisen since the last inspection and staff rarely need to resort to physical interventions. Contact has been made with the local police to ensure that lines of communication are open in case a young person goes missing, but no such incidents have occurred. No complaints have been received. Since the last inspection the safety of young people has been improved by closer attention to fire drills and the temperature of radiators. On the other hand, waking night staff have not received the additional fire safety training. This is needed to address the greater complexities involved if a night-time emergency occurs. However, the rights of young people are now respected by external doors being locked at night and only if absolutely necessary in other circumstances. The property itself is being maintained appropriately and shortfalls are addressed in a timely way. Investment is being put

p.4

Progress

into safer medication and staff training systems too. This means that young people receive an appropriate standard of care from all members of staff, including those who are newly recruited.

p.4

Recommendations

To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):

p.4

Recommendations

 ensure that staff are equipped with the skills required to meet the needs of the children and purpose of the setting. This is with regard to providing fire safety training promptly to waking night staff. (NMS 18.1)

p.4

About this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.

p.5

About this inspection

The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion