Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Care Afloat Ltd in Lancashire
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
27 Feb 2014
- Inspectors verified
Graham Robinson
- URN verified
SC006011
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection. p.3
- As a result, young people are less likely to place themselves at risk through their own actions. p.3
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 727
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC006011 Inspection date 27/02/2014 Inspector Graham Robinson Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 10/12/2013 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Brief description of the service
The home is registered to provide care and accommodation for up to two children with emotional and behavioural difficulties. A private company owns and operates the home.
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress .
p.3
Progress
Since the previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress.
p.3
Progress
The overall rating given following the previous inspection was good. Since then the home has continued to make good progress. For example, young people are benefitting from a greater consistency of care due to all the staff team who work directly with young people, now being permanently based in the home. All staff recently received in-house training on autism, enhancing their knowledge and skills base in this area. This has resulted in young people's specific needs being met more effectively.
p.3
Progress
The home has maintained its good links and cohesive working practices with the external services responsible for keeping young people safe. Should any safeguarding or missing from home issues arise, young people are provided with a co-ordinated, multi-agency response. These active arrangements have contributed significantly to keeping young people safe.
p.3
Progress
Young people are at different stages of their journey through the home. The home has specific strategies in place to address young people's diverse needs. Should young people fail to keep to the boundaries put in place for them, staff work supportively, rather than punitively to address issues of concern. As a result, young people are less likely to place themselves at risk through their own actions.
p.3
Progress
Individual needs are recognised and recorded in planning documents and assessments of individual risk. Serious behaviour management incidents within the home since the previous inspection have been rare, with young people enjoying positive relationships with staff. These relationships provide the foundation for staff to work positively with young people during periods of difficulty and unrest. This has resulted in young people experiencing improved social, emotional and educational outcomes, based on their starting points.
p.4
Progress
Young people are well informed and consulted about their future plans, giving them a feeling of worth, a sense of direction and personal goals to aim for. They confirm their views and opinions are regularly sought and taken account of regarding life in the home and when planning for their own future. For example, the plans for one young person have been modified on a number of occasions recently, to reflect changing attitudes and aspirations for the future.
p.4
Progress
The home is well organised and managed. A permanent staff group work collectively to meet the needs of young people in their care. Young people are relaxed and at ease in the company of staff, appreciating the positive relationships that have been created. One young person speaks enthusiastically about the activities they enjoy and share with staff.
p.4
Progress
At the previous inspection only one recommendation was made. This has been fully addressed resulting in the home being able to evidence more effectively that potential staff members’ right to work in the United Kingdom has been addressed as part of the recruitment process.
p.4
Progress
Despite the short time between inspections the home has made good progress, and the good standard of care noted then has continued to improve. Young people are experiencing positive outcomes in all areas of their lives when compared to their starting point when first admitted. No new recommendations have been made.
p.4
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.5
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion