Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Tim Bristow
- Postcode verified
CM18 7RQ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Too much of the teaching remains inadequate and a number of staff appointments have yet to be secured. p.2
- Staff react to poor behaviour, which is merely contained but not improved. p.2
- Reward systems are not effective enough to encourage pupils in class to behave appropriately at all times. p.2
- The delegation of responsibility is ineffective. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 693
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 50, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 8%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Ms Sharon Taylor-Sezgin Headteacher Longwood Primary School Paringdon Road Harlow CM18 7RQ
p.1
Special measures monitoring inspection of Longwood Primary School
Following my visit to your school on 2 April 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
Special measures monitoring inspection of Longwood Primary School
The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures following the inspection which took place in December 2013.
p.1
Evidence
During this inspection, meetings were held with you, one of the interim headteachers, the assistant headteacher, two members of the interim executive board (IEB) and a representative of the local authority. Short visits were made to most classes. The local authority’s statement of action and the school’s improvement action plans were evaluated.
p.1
Context
During March 2014, two interim headteachers have led the school while you have been absent due to ill health. You are expected to return to work after the Easter holidays. A number of teachers and leaders are leaving the school in April and the school is currently trying to recruit new staff. An IEB took over the responsibility for governance at the end of February 2014. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 01216 799164 Direct email : tim.ogbourn@serco.com
p.1
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The quality of education provided by the school has declined further since the last inspection. The arrangements for staffing and leadership are not fit for purpose. Too much of the teaching remains inadequate and a number of staff appointments have yet to be secured. There are a lot of teachers and teaching assistants who are on temporary or supply contracts. This means that pupils are subject to too many changes.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
One of the consequences of this turbulence in staffing is that behaviour has declined. Pupils with the most challenging behaviour are not looked after effectively because the adults who work with them are not well enough trained. Staff react to poor behaviour, which is merely contained but not improved. Reward systems are not effective enough to encourage pupils in class to behave appropriately at all times.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
You and some other leaders have yet to demonstrate that you understand strategically what needs to be achieved to establish the foundations for school improvement. Leaders are distracted by the problems that occur on a daily basis, which means they pay insufficient attention to laying the foundations for school improvement. The delegation of responsibility is ineffective. Many of the decisions about staffing are reactive to the needs at the time, which has resulted in confusion and a lack of clarity about who is responsible for different aspects of the school’s work.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The IEB has had insufficient time to have an impact. Its members demonstrate that they have a growing understanding of the problems and barriers that need overcoming so that the school can start to improve. Communication between the school leaders, the local authority and the IEB are not yet good enough. All three parties understand that they need to establish closer working relationships so that they can be more effective.
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
Neither the local authority statement of action or the school single plan address with enough urgency the main priorities of strengthening behaviour management and establishing a leadership and staffing structure which will underpin improvements to teaching and learning. The local authority has helped the school by finding interim leaders and identifying staff that will be, or that are, working in the school in the short term. The school is receiving a lot of advice and support from a number of partners. However, this is not having enough impact because of the instability of the staff team and leadership. Following the monitoring inspection, the following judgements were made:
p.2
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The local authority’s statement of action is not fit for purpose.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The school’s single plan is not fit for purpose.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
The school may not appoint newly qualified teachers before the next monitoring inspection.
p.3
The quality of leadership and management at the school
I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the IEB and the Director of Children’s Services for Essex Local Authority. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion