Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 7 May 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Catherine Anwar

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Catherine Anwar

  • Postcode verified

    BN10 8BZ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+21Mostly positivemore positive than 35% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelystrongvery highclearrigoroussuccessfullyrobustimproving
Criticismweakweaknessesnot alwaysnot yetbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings232w−33
  • Leadership569w+28

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
801
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 28%Leadership 69%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Ms Claire Westcott Headteacher Meridian Community Primary School Roderick Avenue North Peacehaven East Sussex BN10 8BZ

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 31 March 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures following the inspection which took place in October 2013.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, I met with you and the senior leaders, a representative from the local authority and the consultant headteacher. The local authority’s statement of action and the school’s improvement plans were evaluated. I visited a range of lessons briefly with you to observe teaching and to talk to pupils, and scrutinised a selection of pupils’ books. I reviewed the local authority’s statement of action and your school improvement plan.

p.1

Context

Since the inspection, one full-time and one part-time teacher have left the school; their classes are currently being taught by supply teachers. A consultant headteacher has been working in the school for two days a week since the inspection. In March 2014 the governing body was replaced by an Interim Executive Board (IEB) which has not yet met. Tribal 1–4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5323 Direct email :suzy.smith@tribalgroup.com

p.1

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Senior leaders have a strong and well-shared vision for the school’s improvement. They are clear about the need to set more rigorous priorities for their work, and have begun to analyse the impact of their actions more effectively. Since the inspection they have worked with renewed vigour and a sharper focus to effectively raise standards of teaching and learning in the school.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

A sensible review by leaders of the teaching and learning policy, which now reflects national standards, has successfully made expectations more explicit to all teachers. Monitoring of teaching by the leadership team has become more intensive and feedback to teachers is now clearer, rightly linking the quality of teaching to its impact on pupils’ progress.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Training for teachers from local authority consultants and school leaders is starting to improve teaching in almost all years, and to boost pupils’ attainment. In Year 6, pupils are making better progress than in previous years, and robust assessment indicates that they will achieve significantly higher scores than Year 6 last year. However, these results are still below those expected nationally, which are as a result of a legacy of previously weak teaching. In Year 2, pupils are now making better progress and their attainment is in line with national expectations. These improvements are reflected in pupils’ books which show improving marking and better work.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

There has been a chequered history of collaboration with and support from the local authority. Since the inspection, the school has felt the very high levels of local authority intervention, while making an impact, are, at times, overwhelming and insensitive. This has not always helped the school’s progress and should be reviewed. The local authority has confidence in the senior leaders to take the school forward, and reflected on clear improvements seen in a recent visit to the school. The consultant headteacher, who is a national leader of education (NLE), has provided valuable support in monitoring and improving teaching and supporting leadership development. Her expertise could be utilised even more productively by senior leaders.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Strengths in middle leadership have been further developed by the introduction of English and mathematics teams. These colleagues have carried out short lesson observations and their evaluations have fed back into improvements seen in the teaching of these subjects. Teachers are also re-energised by the challenges that face them, and are embracing opportunities to improve their teaching.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Useful systems to track the progress, behaviour and attendance of pupils have been honed and now inform lesson planning and intervention better. On our visits to lessons, pupils were well engaged as a result of the new focus on learning behaviours, and of better teaching and more exciting topics.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The newly instigated IEB had only been in place for two days at the time of this inspection. The weaknesses noted in the inspection report remain in relation to governor oversight of the school, and it is an urgent priority that they improve the level of their support and challenge for the school.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The local authority’s statement of action is fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school’s improvement plan is fit for purpose.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school may appoint newly qualified teachers before the next monitoring inspection.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Interim Executive Board, and the Director of Children’s Services for East Sussex. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion