Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Marilyn Mottram
- Postcode verified
CV6 6FR
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- When weaknesses are identified you make arrangements for teachers to receive appropriate support to help them to improve their practice. p.2
- Pupils understand the systems in place to address poor behaviour. p.2
- Comments include, ‘There is less shouting-out in lessons now.’ ‘People get on with their work more and don’t mess around so much.’ Your records show fewer incidents of poor behaviour. p.2
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance11
“Governors are aware that some teaching requires improvement.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 871
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 6%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Sara Bennett & Tamar McCarthy Headteachers Holbrook Primary School Gateside Road Coventry CV6 6FR
p.1
School
Following my visit to your school on 2 April 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in January 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
School
Senior leaders and governors are not taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the last section 5 inspection and plans are not sharply focused on rapidly bringing about improvement. The school should take immediate action to:
p.1
School
include specific measurable targets and timescales in the school improvement plan urgently organise training and support to develop governors’ independent understanding of information on pupils’ achievement.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with you and other senior leaders, the Chair of Governors and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. A range of documentation was reviewed including the latest information about pupils’ progress and feedback to teachers following lesson observations and reviews of pupils’ work. The school improvement plan was evaluated. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 6799169 Direct email : mathew.mitchell@serco.com
p.1
Context
Since the last inspection, two governors have left and two new governors have been appointed. A member of staff has returned from maternity leave. Governors have appointed an additional teaching assistant to support pupils’ learning.
p.2
Main findings
You have amended the school improvement plan to include the areas requiring improvement identified at the last section 5 inspection. However, the plan does not contain specific measurable targets against which the school can monitor and evaluate the impact of actions taken. It also lacks an indication of the time-scales to which the school is operating. As a result, there is a lack of clarity about what to school needs to do to become ‘good’ or an appropriate timescale for the planned improvements.
p.2
Main findings
Governance has not improved. Governors do not have a clear understanding of what the school needs to do to be ‘good’. They do not fully understand information about pupils’ achievement or how pupils’ progress and attainment compare to those of pupils’ nationally. Governors are aware that some teaching requires improvement. However, they are not checking carefully enough that your actions and those of other senior leaders are helping pupils of different abilities make better progress in all classes and subjects. As a result, governors are not well-informed about the challenges facing the school and are not holding school leaders to account for their work.
p.2
Main findings
You and other senior leaders frequently monitor teaching and pupils’ achievement. Feedback to teachers identifies successful practice and where further improvements are required. When weaknesses are identified you make arrangements for teachers to receive appropriate support to help them to improve their practice. Your records show that there have been some improvements in some aspects of teaching. However, you rightly identify that these improvements are not yet consistent enough to help pupils of different abilities make better progress in all classes.
p.2
Main findings
You have quickly taken a range of actions to address the behaviour issues identified at the last inspection. Pupils understand the systems in place to address poor behaviour. They value the ‘triangles’ and the ‘cards’ used by teachers to monitor and manage behaviour during lessons. They say that the new ‘stuck stations’ help them to ‘keep trying and finish their work’. Pupils feel that behaviour in lessons has improved. Comments include, ‘There is less shouting-out in lessons now.’ ‘People get on with their work more and don’t mess around so much.’ Your records show fewer incidents of poor behaviour.
p.2
Main findings
You have taken urgent action to improve pupils’ attendance. You have improved your systems for communicating with parents. When compared to the same period last year, attendance has improved. Your latest information shows that attendance is currently at national average.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.3
External support
The local authority has increased the level of support it offers to the school. Through the local authority partnership review group meetings and the regular visits from the local authority adviser you receive an appropriate level of support and challenge. The first partnership review meeting is booked for the end of April 2014. A full review of the governing body will take place on 3 April 2014. Please send copies of these reports to me. The local authority adviser has helped you to take suitable action to identify more-able children in Early Years Foundation Stage and Key Stage 1. As a result, there are sharper systems in place for checking children’s progress in this key stage.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Coventry.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion