Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)

Children's Home run by Esland South Limited in Bexley

Inspected 20 Feb 2014 · published 3 May 2014 · URN SC387684

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Patrick Sullivan

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection datesingle source

    20 Feb 2014

  • Inspectors verified

    Patrick Sullivan

  • URN verified

    SC387684

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−3Mixedmore positive than 31% of reports of this type
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisegood progressimprovedhappyclearimprovingclearly
Criticisminadequatefailednot metdeclinedconcerns

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
652
shorter than usual (typical 1387)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 50
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
0
typical 4
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 87%About the inspection 13%

Full report text

Unique reference number SC387684 Inspection date 20/02/2014 Inspector Patrick Sullivan Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home

p.1

Date of last inspection 24/05/2013 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Brief description of the service

The home is a residential home for six children and young people with emotional and behavioural difficulties. The home is operated by a private company and can offer planned, emergency and respite placements.

p.3

The inspection judgements and what they mean

Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.

p.3

Progress

Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress .

p.3

Progress

At the last full inspection in May 2013 the home was judged to be good.

p.3

Progress

The home is judged to have made good progress as the one requirement and three recommendations made at the last inspection have been addressed.

p.3

Progress

The requirement arising from the last inspection relates to recruitment. Full checks are now carried out on all staff and these are kept in a central location.

p.3

Progress

The first recommendation concerned case recording and making it more accessible to the young people. The case files are now laid out in a clear and easily understood manner.

p.3

Progress

The second recommendation related to promoting the individual identity of the young people. The home has made efforts to improve on this area of its practice and has now appointed a 'diversity champion' to further improve on this aspect of its work. The final recommendation concerns improving the facilities to assist the young people in their education. In this area the home has made improvements with regards to Wi-Fi access and support to the young people in their education.

p.3

Progress

Since the last inspection the Registered Manager has left the home and the deputy manager is currently acting up to cover the vacancy, supported by the organisations compliance officer. The staffing situation in the home has improved since the last inspection with a number of staff being transferred in from another unit nearby.

p.4

Progress

The records of the home are well maintained and up to date. There have been no complaints received since the last inspection. The recording of restraints could be improved as one incident was recorded as two separate episodes when it was clearly the same incident.

p.4

Progress

The home has a 'Central Reports Log' which records every incident including supervision sessions, keyworker sessions, restraints and sanctions. These are then also recorded in detail in separate files and books but the result is somewhat confusing and does not make it easy to establish patterns of behaviour. This system was implemented by the previous manager and will be reviewed now that he has left.

p.4

Progress

The physical state of the home is reasonable but could do with some updating. A chest of drawers in one of the bedrooms was missing a drawer front.

p.4

Progress

During the course of the inspection a new resident of the home was interviewed along with his parents who had been to visit him for the day. The placement had been an emergency one but the young person and his parents were happy with the way he had been welcomed into the home and with the level of communication and information received from staff at the home.

p.4

About this inspection

The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.

p.5

About this inspection

The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion