Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 1 May 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Ian McNeilly

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Ian McNeilly

  • Postcode verified

    S41 8AZ

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+30Mostly positivemore positive than 40% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveclearlyrigorous
Criticismlacksnot yetnot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
858
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
4
typical 5
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Gary Martin Headteacher Highfield Hall Primary School Highfield Lane Chesterfield S41 8AZ

p.1

Primary School

Following my visit to your school on 7 April 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Primary School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in February 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Primary School

 ensure that all members of staff are fully aware of the strategies required to increase pupils’ progress  improve the quality of marking, particularly in terms of giving pupils extra challenge where necessary  amend the school action plan so that it lists milestones and members of staff involved more clearly, particularly those evaluating impact.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you, two representatives of the governing body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The school action plan was evaluated. You took me on a tour of the school and we made brief visits to every class. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9146 Direct email : clare.benson@serco.com

p.1

Main findings

You reacted to the findings of your recent inspection by quickly creating an action plan which specifically addresses each area of development. Some of your improvement work is already underway, though the plan itself will be more effective when clearer milestones to review progress are added, along with listing those individuals responsible for evaluating impact.

p.2

Main findings

You have changed the way you track pupil progress. This means that you, your teachers and your governors have more information about pupil achievement. You can now monitor rates of progress towards meeting end of key stage targets as well as single year targets. There are now increased targets for those pupils you have identified as having good potential to exceed expected progress.

p.2

Main findings

After your inspection, you observed the practice of every teacher in the school. Your process for monitoring the quality of teaching through lesson observations has been made more rigorous. It now links more clearly to the progress made by pupils. It is too early to judge the impact of this change.

p.2

Main findings

Teachers have had training on better meeting the needs of the most able pupils in writing lessons. There is awareness that the level of challenge needs to increase for all pupils, for example, in the sophistication of the questions that pupils are asked and more thought-provoking comments being made in marking. However, specific strategies for increasing the level of challenge for pupils have not yet been made clear to members of staff, though you have plans to do so.

p.2

Main findings

You acknowledge that your marking policy is not being fully adhered to by all staff, though there are examples of good practice in this area. Better use needs to be made of time given to pupils to respond to marking, which can only be effective if there is something worthy to respond to. Marking is regularly carried out but lacks the extra challenge which would best help pupils to progress.

p.2

Main findings

Most of your teachers with responsibility for subjects have had training to make them more effective leaders. All of them have been directed to create action plans for their areas which detail how they, as individuals, are going to have an impact on increasing pupil progress in their areas.

p.2

Main findings

The full governing body met immediately after the inspection to discuss the findings and to decide how best to address your school’s areas for development. Governors now realise that they need to be more focused on pupil progress. A group has been convened specifically to review progress made against the school’s new action plan. This will take place on a monthly basis. A governor who is a former primary headteacher has delivered training on writing for members of staff. Governors are committed to helping the school improve; an external review of governance to help them do this has been arranged for the summer term. Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

Based on the judgement of your recent inspection, your local authority has increased the amount of support available to you. Your local authority representative is committed to making several visits to the school in the summer term. After your inspection, your local authority representative visited the school and commented on your action plan. He has arranged an external review of governance by a National Leader of Education.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, and the Director of Children’s Services for Derbyshire.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion