Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Honoree Gordon
- Postcode verified
HG1 4HZ
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- You need to continue to access the support of the local authority to ensure that you eliminate the weaker teaching that remains. p.3
- The school should take further action to: p.1
- However, you need to consider how best to ensure that the most able pupils in the large, upper Key Stage 2 class progress faster and attain higher levels at the end of Key Stage 2. p.2
- The letter should be copied to the following: p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 1,033
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 52, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 4
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 11%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs Caroline Chadwick Headteacher Woodfield Primary School Woodfield Road Harrogate North Yorkshire HG1 4HZ
p.1
School, North Yorkshire
Following my visit to your school on 28 March 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
School, North Yorkshire
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in January 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
School, North Yorkshire
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, meetings were held with you and with two members of the governing body. I held a telephone discussion with a representative of the local authority. These discussions focused on the actions taken since the last inspection. The school improvement action plans were evaluated.
p.1
Evidence
I toured the school with you and we observed short parts of lessons and phonics sessions together. We also looked at some of pupils’ work in the lessons. We discussed a number of documents, including the governors’ plan for monitoring the CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566857 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email :jkinsman@cfbt.com work of the school, data about pupils’ current progress and records of monitoring teaching. I had lunch with pupils in the dining room.
p.1
Context
On the day of this inspection one class and their teacher were out of school on a residential visit. Two other teachers were not in school.
p.2
Main findings
You have acted swiftly to address the points suggested for improvement at the time of your last inspection. Your actions are having a positive impact on improving pupils’ achievement, notably in reading. Teaching is improving but your records and our discussions confirm that the quality remains inconsistent.
p.2
Main findings
Some decisions you have taken to set the school on the path towards being judged good by the time of your next inspection are already bearing fruit. For example, the teaching of phonics (letters and their sounds) is improving. Pupils have been divided into separate teaching groups according to their ability or level and are getting more regular phonics practice than before. Your data and our visits to phonics sessions show that pupils’ progress in phonics is accelerating. This is helping to develop pupils’ reading skills at a faster pace.
p.2
Main findings
You are becoming much sharper in analysing data on pupils’ progress. Changes made to how you monitor progress allow you to see more easily how each group of pupils and each class is doing. You are rightly now sharing this information with class teachers and middle leaders so that they are beginning to play a greater part in your drive to raise achievement.
p.2
Main findings
Your data on pupils’ current progress show that progress is improving, but remains uneven across the year groups. You are aware that this is mainly because the quality of teaching is too variable. Since your last inspection you have developed more effective ways to monitor the quality of teaching over time. You are collecting a wider range of evidence, such as scrutinising pupils’ written work, as well as observing lessons. Records focus more directly on how well pupils are learning; and what pupils’ written work reveals about their progress. This evidence is supporting you in challenging some teachers to do better.
p.2
Main findings
Records and our visits to lessons show that teachers’ skills are strengthening. For example, visits to other schools are stimulating fresh ideas to make lessons more engaging and challenging. The phonics sessions we observed were delivered well, pitched at the right speed for each group and so pupils’ learning was good. However, you need to consider how best to ensure that the most able pupils in the large, upper Key Stage 2 class progress faster and attain higher levels at the end of Key Stage 2. Your plans for improvement are sharply focused on improving pupils’ achievement, especially in reading and mathematics. You have set out higher expectations for pupils’ progress and have a very clear programme specifying how governors are monitoring this.
p.2
Main findings
Governors are clearer about their role in checking how well the school is doing. Some governors have been in to school to see for themselves, for example to observe phonics teaching, and discussed what they thought with you. They are better informed than before. They appreciate the weekly written update you do for them detailing the actions you have taken and the benefit these are bringing. The training for governing bodies led by the local authority since your inspection has given members of the governing body greater confidence in being able to question and challenge you about pupils’ achievement. They understand the data about pupils’ progress better than they did before.
p.3
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.3
External support
The appointment of a new local authority link officer for the school shortly before the section 5 inspection has proved to be a good decision as the pace of improvement in school is accelerating. Local authority support has been ratcheted up further since the inspection and is proving effective in improving teaching and in strengthening how the school evaluates its work.
p.3
External support
You are using advice well, for example in choosing new books to boost reading. Already, data show that pupils’ progress is improving. Your work within a local group of schools is opening up the school to sharing new ideas. You need to continue to access the support of the local authority to ensure that you eliminate the weaker teaching that remains.
p.3
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for North Yorkshire, and as below.
p.3
Her Majesty’s Inspector
The letter should be copied to the following:
p.3
Her Majesty’s Inspector
Appropriate authority - Chair of the Governing Body Local authority
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion