Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 29 Apr 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Janet Palmer

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Janet Palmer

  • Postcode verified

    WA5 1HG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+46Positivemore positive than 48% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingmake good progresshappypositiveclearsafeclearly
Criticisminsufficientbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings214w0
  • Leadership489w+46

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
703
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 29%Leadership 67%About the inspection 3%

Full report text

Mrs Rose Howard-Rigby Head of School St Gregory's Catholic High School Cromwell Avenue Westbrook Warrington Cheshire WA5 1HG

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 2 April 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. Thank you for the help you gave during the inspection and for the time you made available to discuss the actions which have been taken since the school’s recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The inspection was the first monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures following the inspection which took place in December 2013.

p.1

Evidence

During this inspection, meetings were held with the head of school, the Chair and Vice-Chair of the Governing Body and representatives of the local authority. The local authority’s statement of action and the school’s improvement plan were evaluated.

p.1

Context

A new temporary governing body was constituted on 28 February 2014. As of 28 March 2014 the executive headteacher is no longer at the school and you, as head of school are the senior member of staff. An interim headteacher has been CfBT Inspection Services Suite 22 West Lancs Investment Centre Maple View Skelmersdale WN8 9TG T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 01695 566939 Direct F 01695 729320 Direct email: glaw@cfbt.com appointed for the summer term. Since the inspection the school has appointed a new site manager and assistant caretaker.

p.1

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Although not expecting the outcome of the December inspection, leaders and managers accept that there had been insufficient scrutiny of some aspects of the school’s work in the past and that there is room to develop and improve. The current leadership team understands the importance of sharing the good practice that already exists at St Gregory’s to improve teaching and learning, so that all students can make good progress. The new temporary governing body is comprised of members who are highly experienced in school improvement, safeguarding and finance. They have a clear idea of what the school needs to do to move forward and are able to both support, and challenge the work of senior and middle leaders.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Following the monitoring inspection the following judgements were made:

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school's improvement plan is fit for purpose.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

Senior leaders have produced a detailed improvement plan that focuses on the inspection findings. This has been shared with staff and with the governing body. The plan identifies the need to accelerate the progress of underachieving groups of students and this is linked to data analysis and strategies to improve teaching. However, to ensure that improvements are sustainable, and that all students feel valued, happy and safe in school, there are some issues raised in the report that need to be addressed throughout the plan. This includes culture, ethos and the development of the student voice. Those responsible for undertaking and monitoring the actions in the plan are clearly identified, as are the requirements for further support and associated resource implications. Senior and middle leaders are committed to making rapid improvements and to this end they have already begun working closely with advisers.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The local authority’s statement of action is fit for purpose.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

This is a well-considered document that is supported by a detailed support plan. The plan includes the funding of support of a senior adviser from the local authority; a human resources / business manager; a vulnerable groups and safeguarding manager; and a finance officer. The local authority has also funded and brokered support from subject leaders of education for science and the curriculum; two national leaders of education for vulnerable groups and behaviour, and teaching and learning; a national leader for governance; a subject leader of education and business manager from a local outstanding school; and an Archdiocesan adviser. Early actions arising from the plan have met with approval from staff working with the advisers. They value their input which they recognise is already a having a positive impact. Early reports from the advisers are insightful and specific in their recommendations for further actions.

p.2

The quality of leadership and management at the school

The school may not appoint newly qualified teachers before the next monitoring inspection. The single central record meets statutory requirements for safeguarding.

p.3

The quality of leadership and management at the school

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the Chair of the Governing Body, the Director of Children’s Services for Warrington and as below. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion