Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 29 Apr 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Philippa Darley

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Philippa Darley

  • Postcode verified

    DE75 7HS

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+66Positivemore positive than 64% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongeffectivestrengthsrigorousclearlystrengthpreciseaccurate
Criticismweaknessesgaps

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
780
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
15%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Mrs Mary Hill Headteacher Marlpool Junior School Claramount Road Heanor DE75 7HS

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 3 April 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in January 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you, members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. The school improvement plan was evaluated. Pupil progress information and the school’s records of monitoring the quality of teaching were analysed. I made informal visits to each class and spoke to some pupils about their work.

p.1

Context

There have been no significant staffing changes since the previous inspection. The school is currently undergoing some building works to improve the entrance and reception area for parents. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 679 9153 Direct email : naik.sandhu@serco.com

p.1

Main findings

The headteacher remains committed to making the necessary changes to bring about swift improvement to outcomes for pupils. She has a precise knowledge of the school’s strengths and weaknesses and this is underpinned by a rigorous and accurate pupil progress tracking system. The school improvement plan reflects these ambitions. Targets are challenging and in line with national expectations. Planned actions are appropriate, with those responsible for leading and monitoring the impact of these are clearly identified. The headteacher has used the information she has on current progress to set clear, quantifiable success criteria by which leaders at all levels can measure the progress the school is making.

p.2

Main findings

Since the inspection, school leaders and teachers have worked quickly to ensure that the information they have on pupils’ progress now includes an analysis of progress in reading, writing and mathematics for each class set against national expectations. Expectations for increasing the proportions of pupils making better than expected progress have also been raised. This has enabled teachers to identify additional pupils in need of some targeted support. Teaching assistants have been involved in this process. They have received direct training from an external consultant in improving their role in monitoring progress within lessons. Leaders have re- organised groups in Years 5 and 6 so that pupils are now taught in single-year groups for mathematics. There is some emerging evidence that this is starting to accelerate their progress in this area.

p.2

Main findings

Subject leaders are increasingly involved in monitoring their own areas of responsibility. An analysis of guided reading activities and a literacy work scrutiny has been undertaken. Feedback from these activities to members of staff is detailed, with considerable attention being given to how they can support individual pupils to make more progress.

p.2

Main findings

Governors continue to be a considerable strength of the school. They have a good understanding of the information they receive on pupils’ achievement and have analysed this so they are clearly aware of where gaps need to close. They have a frank view of where the school is in its improvement journey and provide an appropriate balance of support and challenge to school leaders and teaching staff. They have ensured that the school website now includes all the statutory information required for parents and have instigated a more frequent cycle for monitoring health and safety across the school site.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The school has been identified as a ‘priority’ school by the local authority and benefits from the support of a school improvement adviser. The adviser knows the school well and recognises that there is strong capacity in the leadership of the school for self-improvement. Support from an experienced mathematics teacher has been brokered in to improve practice and to enable increased interventions in Year 6. The adviser has also provided some support to the governing body, particularly in supporting governors’ understanding of how the school performs in comparison to the local and national picture.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Derbyshire.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion