Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 28 Apr 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Christopher Moodie

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Christopher Moodie

  • Postcode verified

    WD3 4BT

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+39Positivemore positive than 44% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseexceptionallyeffectivevery highclearenthusiasmsuccessfulimprovingaccurate
Criticismconcernnot high qualitynot ambitiousnot yetnot precise

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
766
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
15%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Tracey Ali Headteacher Arnett Hills Junior Mixed and Infant School Berry Lane Rickmansworth WD3 4BT

p.1

Mixed and Infant School

Following my visit to your school on 27 March 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

Mixed and Infant School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection October 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Mixed and Infant School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

Mixed and Infant School

 raise teachers’ expectations of what pupils can achieve.

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, I held meetings with you, the deputy headteacher, three members of the governing body and a representative of the local authority to discuss the action taken since the last inspection. I also evaluated the school action plans, and the school’s assessment documentation. You accompanied me during visits to all classes in the school, where we observed teaching and looked at pupils’ work. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 0121 6799169 Direct email : mathew.mitchell@serco.com

p.1

Main findings

You have a clear understanding of how to tackle the issues identified in the recent inspection. The quality of pupils’ writing was the main area of concern and you are taking action to improve the teaching of writing across the school. As a result, almost all pupils are making better progress. Some pupils’ writing is of an exceptionally high standard, and many pupils in Key Stage 2 are writing at a standard above that expected for their age. The accuracy of assessment in writing is improving because you have dedicated time to developing teachers’ skills in this area. The assessments that teachers make are broadly accurate now, but are not yet precise enough to present school leaders with a very clear understanding of how well pupils are progressing. In particular, some of the assessments do not reflect the high quality of the writing. This in turn is leading to teachers and leaders setting targets that are not ambitious enough.

p.2

Main findings

Since the inspection, teachers are providing pupils with a broader range of opportunities to practise their writing skills in subjects such as history and science. Pupils are responding well to this, and some of their writing reflects their enthusiasm. For example, a trip to Portsmouth to visit the Marie Rose inspired some pupils in Year 4 to produce written work of a very high standard. Similarly, pupils in Year 5 are writing very thoughtful and well-constructed letters to you, hoping to persuade you to let them visit London. The development of early writing is also going well. Pupils in the Reception class are learning to write in a structured way through a range of exciting and relevant activities in both the indoor and outdoor parts of their classroom. Pupils in Key Stage 1 are reading and writing at a higher level than nationally expected.

p.2

Main findings

Your plans are effective. They outline each of the steps that you are taking and how you measure impact. Your systems to monitor and evaluate the quality of teaching are well-structured and are leading to changes. You know, for example, that one teacher has developed a very successful way of making sure that pupils know what they need to do to improve. You are spreading this method across the school so that all classes can benefit from it. Governors are holding school leaders to account while providing support and encouragement. They are asking the right questions more frequently and are visiting school to see the evidence of progress for themselves.

p.2

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.2

External support

The local authority is providing you with good support. This has contributed to the progress that the school has made since the inspection. An Improvement Partner is supporting your evaluation of teaching, and knows the school well. An advisory teacher is supporting the development of literacy and another advisor is helping with assessment. This support is targeting those areas where the school needs to improve the most.

p.2

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Hertfordshire.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion