Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (CIF)

Grangetown Primary School

Inspected 20 Mar 2014 · published 25 Apr 2014 · URN 111647

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Requires improvement

David Shearsmith (lead), Graeme Clarke

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    20 Mar 2014

  • Inspectors verified

    David Shearsmith, Graeme Clarke

  • Leadership and management verified

    Good

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Requires improvement

  • Previous overall verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    TS6 7JA

  • Name on report verified

    Grangetown Primary School

  • URN verified

    111647

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Hollow rings show the previous inspection, 2012.

  • OverallRequires improvement
  • Leadership and managementGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+8Mostly positivemore positive than 39% of reports of this type graded Requires improvement
OutstandingGoodRIInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Requires improvement.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praisemake good progressoutstandingimprovingenjoygood progressstrongimprovedeffectively
Criticismweaknot alwaysrequires improvementinadequateweaknessesnot yetnot consistentlynot sufficiently

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improveAbout the inspectionLeadership positive critical
  • Findings595w+88
  • Leadership865w+27
  • What needs to improve1468w−35

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,837
about usual (typical 3064)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 55, typical 47
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 16%Leadership 23%What needs to improve 38%About the inspection 23%

Full report text

Grangetown Primary School St George's Road, Grangetown, Middlesbrough, TS6 7JA

p.1

Overall effectiveness

Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement of pupils Requires improvement 3 Quality of teaching Requires improvement 3 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Good 2

p.1

This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because

 Pupils’ achievement is not high enough. Children do not get off to a rapid start in the Early Years Foundation Stage and progress is not fast enough in Key Stage 1.  Teaching is not consistently good or better over time, as activities are not always sufficiently challenging for all pupils or provide enough interest for boys, so they can make faster progress and reach a higher standard in their work.  Pupils are not given clear advice on how to improve their work when it is marked so they can learn from their own mistakes and reach higher levels in their work.  Pupils’ skills in spelling, punctuation, handwriting and grammar are not good enough to help them write fluently and accurately.  Standards in English at Key Stage 1 are not high enough. Pupils have weak phonic knowledge (understanding the sounds that letters make) and the teaching of reading and writing is not challenging enough to ensure that pupils reach a higher standard.

p.1

This is a school that requires improvement. It is not good because

 Children in the Early Years Foundation Stage have weak literacy skills. They do not have enough opportunities to develop their reading and writing skills in lessons, small-group activities and through play.

p.1

The school has the following strengths

 The new headteacher’s drive and rigorous approach to improving the school is improving teaching and driving up standards.  A skilful deputy headteacher and the middle leaders have supported this drive for improving teaching and morale in the school is high.  Accelerated progress in Year 6 has ensured that standards are now broadly average at the end of Key Stage 2. Progress in mathematics is good and standards are rising across the school, owing to better teaching in mathematics.  Pupils’ behaviour is good as they enjoy coming to school. They are courteous, well-mannered and work well in lessons. They have a good understanding of how to keep safe and know about different types of bullying.  Governors provide good support and challenge and are very committed to the school. They have made good strategic decisions regarding the appointment of new staff and this has strengthened the quality of teaching and is

p.1

Information about this inspection

 Inspectors watched 28 lessons or parts of lessons, of which two were observed jointly with the headteacher.  Inspectors observed groups of pupils, as well as individual pupils, working with teaching assistants. They listened to Year 2 pupils read and heard pupils in other year groups read in lessons.  Inspectors talked to a range of pupils about their work and play in school, including the school council. They also studied a range of pupils’ work across the school.  Meetings were held with three governors as well as teaching staff, including middle leaders and the headteacher. The inspector also met with a representative of the local authority.  Inspectors observed the overall work of the school and studied a number of documents, including the school’s data about pupils’ current progress. They also examined documents relating to safeguarding, governance, behaviour and attendance.  Inspectors were unable to take into account the responses to the on-line questionnaire (Parent

p.2

Information about this inspection

View) as there were too few responses. They did, however, consider the school’s parent, pupil and staff questionnaires.  Inspectors looked at school displays, its website and a range of other evidence relating to the wider work of the school.

p.2

Inspection team

David Shearsmith, Lead inspector Additional Inspector Graeme Clarke Additional Inspector

p.2

Information about this school

 The school is smaller than the average-sized primary school.  A well-above average proportion of pupils is known to be eligible for the pupil premium, which is additional funding for those pupils eligible for free school meals, children in the care of the local authority and children of service families.  A well-above average proportion of pupils is supported through school action. A well-above average proportion of pupils is supported at school action plus or has a statement of special educational need.  The vast majority of pupils are of White British heritage.  The school has achieved the Healthy School status, Anti-Bullying Charter and Leading Aspect award for behaviour management.  The school meets the government’s current floor standards, which are the minimum expectations for pupils’ attainment and progress in English and mathematics.  The Early Years Foundation Stage is taught in a Reception and a Nursery class that share the

p.3

Information about this school

same indoor and outdoor learning areas.  The school has a breakfast club managed by the governing body.  The school has a specially resourced learning support base, with 15 places, where some pupils are taught alongside other pupils who transfer from nearby schools.  The school has a resourced provision (the early intervention support base) which offers places for 10 pupils (or more if part-time) whose misbehaviour puts them at risk of being excluded from schools in the locality.  The school appointed a new headteacher in September 2012.  There have been a number of staff changes since the last inspection.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve teaching so that it is consistently good or better by:  ensuring that activities challenge all pupils, including boys, to reach higher standards in their work  improving pupils’ spelling, punctuation, handwriting and grammar skills so they can write more efficiently and effectively  ensuring that all teachers follow the school’s new system for marking and that in all classes pupils are given time to think about their teachers’ comments and improve their work.

p.3

What does the school need to do to improve further?

 Improve standards in English at Key Stage 1 and children’s literacy skills in the Early Years Foundation Stage by:  improving the teaching of reading, writing and phonic knowledge (understanding the sounds letters make), so that pupils learn to read and write more quickly  ensuring that children in the Early Years Foundation Stage have more opportunities for developing their reading and writing skills in lessons, small-group activities and through play.

p.3

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

 Achievement requires improvement as standards in English at Key Stage 1 are not high enough. Pupils’ progress picks up in some classes and then slows in others. Consequently, pupils do not reach the standards they are capable of by the end of Key Stage 1.  Children in the Early Years Foundation Stage do not get a good enough grounding in developing their reading, writing and phonic knowledge (understanding the sounds that letters make) to prepare them for Key Stage 1.  Children enter the Early Years Foundation Stage with skills that are well-below what is typical for their age. They have particular weaknesses in their literacy skills and personal and social development. Settling them into learning is done well, so that they are ready to learn and they make good progress in their personal development. Overall they make expected progress in all other areas, although better than this in speaking and listening. Their skills are still below

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

average by the time they leave the Reception class.  Pupils make expected and occasionally good progress through Key Stage 1. Standards have been rising over time, but they are still below and sometimes well-below average, particularly in English, by the end of the key stage. Tasks set do not sufficiently challenge pupils to work at higher levels in reading and writing. In 2013, leaders quickly picked up on the weak performance in the national screening check for phonics in Year 1 and introduced a new systematic approach that is beginning to make a difference. Pupils now have better skills and are on track to perform closer to the national average this year. Standards in mathematics are higher, as teaching is now more consistent.  Pupils continue to make at least expected progress across Key Stage 2, and in this key stage the number of pupils making good progress is increasing. They make accelerated progress in Year 6

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

in reading, writing and, particularly, in mathematics. They reach standards that are broadly average by the time they leave the school. However, pupils’ performance in the spelling, grammar and punctuation test was well-below average at the end of Key Stage 2. These aspects of writing are not taught well enough across the school and restrict pupils’ fluency.  Boys do not perform as well as girls, as they are insufficiently challenged. Girls outperform boys. Boys reach standards that are below the national average at both key stages. Leaders are aware of this and are taking good steps to improve boys’ performance across the school.  Pupils eligible for the pupil premium, including those known to be eligible for free school meals, typically make expected and sometimes good progress across the school, particularly at Key Stage 2. As a result, these pupils reach standards that are close to those of similar pupils

p.4

The achievement of pupils requires improvement

nationally and half a term ahead of their peers in reading, writing and mathematics overall.  The most able pupils make expected and sometimes better progress at Key Stage 2, particularly in mathematics. Some are on track to reach the highest level in mathematics by the end of this school year. In Key Stage 1, the most able pupils make expected progress, but are not always challenged to reach high enough levels, particularly in reading and writing.  Disabled pupils and those with special educational needs usually make good progress. Progress is stronger across Key Stage 2, with pupils reaching standards close to those of similar pupils nationally. Pupils in both the resource bases make good progress. Teachers have a good understanding of pupils’ needs and provide learning tasks that get the best out of them. In the afternoons, these pupils are integrated into school life where they make progress similar to that

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 Although teaching is improving, it still requires improvement as it is not yet consistently good over time. Aspects of good teaching vary from class to class. For instance, the school has agreed on new ways of marking, but this is not always carried out well throughout the school.  Work in pupils’ books and the checks that the school carries out show that on occasions expectations are not high enough of what pupils can achieve and this results in pupils not reaching a high enough standard in their work.  Children in the Early Years Foundation Stage have weak literacy skills as there are too few opportunities for them to develop their reading and writing skills by practising these on a daily basis, including when they choose to play. The daily sessions in phonics have improved, but have not yet had an impact on children’s understanding and their acquisition of these skills to ensure that they make good progress.

p.4

The quality of teaching requires improvement

 Pupils’ spelling and grammatical skills are weak across the school. In a Years 1/2 writing lesson on description, pupils’ progress was slowed because they were not confident enough to apply these skills as they put down their ideas on paper. While the pupils have been taught the skills they need, they have not been given enough time or opportunities to become confident in using them.  In all classes, weak handwriting skills often hamper pupils’ opportunities to deepen their understanding of different types of writing. For example, in a Year 5 lesson on writing a persuasive letter, pupils’ lack of fluency in writing, including their handwriting, lessened their enjoyment in the task and their learning slowed. Work in books typically shows that pupils do not always produce sufficient writing owing to this weakness.  Where boys are challenged to write and are highly engaged, they make typically outstanding

p.5

The quality of teaching requires improvement

progress. In a Year 6 writing lesson, for example, boys were keen to write instructions about how to journey through a labyrinth. The boys’ learning was deepened as the work was exciting and demanded that everyone worked to a high level. This is not typically seen however. Boys do not always make good progress, as they are not sufficiently challenged or interested in their tasks and their concentration fades.  Pupils benefit from a new lesson-planning system that the school has put in place which ensures that pupils make better progress because lessons are modified daily to deepen their understanding. Pupils typically respond well to the sharpness of teachers’ questioning that makes pupils think more. They are keen to learn when teachers provide stimulating and exciting activities that motivate and accelerate their learning and progress, as is often the case in mathematics.  The new system for marking work is effective and where it is applied, it helps pupils to

p.5

The quality of teaching requires improvement

understand their mistakes and make faster progress. It is not applied consistently in all classes and so not all pupils have the benefit of learning from their mistakes and improving their work.

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

 The behaviour of pupils is good. They enjoy coming to school and work and play harmoniously. They cooperate in lessons and readily share ideas about their work. They have good attitudes to learning as the school has a strong emphasis on this. Pupils work hard. In some classes they produce a lot of work. Pupils demonstrate sustained thinking and persevere with problems and tasks set, particularly in Key Stage 2.  Pupils are very orderly as they move around this large school building, whether supervised or on their own. They are courteous, polite and well-mannered and have respect for adults and each other. They enjoy taking responsibility for various tasks around the school which help develop them as caring citizens.  At playtimes, all pupils are happy to participate and enjoy the equipment provided by the school to enable them to engage in various activities. The school is currently training some ‘playground

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

buddies’ to further support others at playtimes and dinnertimes. Pupils enjoy a healthy school meal and relate well to each other in the dining hall. They also benefit from a good start to their day in the school’s breakfast club. Pupils in the two resource bases are included in school life, wherever possible.  Attendance is improving and is now below average after a period of being very low. The school has developed a wide range of strategies, including rewards, to ensure that pupils are punctual and attend well. The pastoral manager leads the school’s drive for improving attendance and is having a very positive impact by working with parents to make sure pupils attend well.  The school’s work to keep pupils safe and secure is good. It has made pupils’ understanding of how to keep safe a priority. Pupils have many opportunities to experience a variety of activities in order to learn how to manage risk in a wide range of situations. Pupils have a good

p.5

The behaviour and safety of pupils are good

understanding about fire and water safety and how to keep safe on the Internet.  Pupils say they feel safe in school. They also say that there is very little bullying in school and that if it does arise, they are very confident that staff will sort it out. The school has a very strong commitment to ensure that pupils do not experience bullying. They have ‘anti-bullying ambassadors’ who support pupils avoiding bullying and resolve any problems.

p.6

The leadership and management are good

 The headteacher is relentless in his drive for improvement and is passionate for pupils to achieve well. This drive is raising standards and improving teaching in a relatively short period of time. He is supported by a skilful deputy headteacher who has focused on improving teaching through direct support. Together they have eradicated the weakest teaching and increased the amount of good and better teaching so that the school is set to improve even further.  Middle leaders have also played a pivotal role in developing teachers’ subject knowledge and ability to teach particular subjects. The subject leader for mathematics has a good knowledge of her subject. She provides valuable support and guidance as well as being a proficient classroom practitioner. As a result, the teaching of mathematics has improved across the school.  Leaders use performance management to good effect and this has contributed to improvements

p.6

The leadership and management are good

in all aspects of the school’s work. Where teachers reach their targets, they are rewarded appropriately for their work in the classroom and as a leader.  A new system for tracking pupils’ progress, alongside meetings to discuss any pupils who are falling behind, is ensuring that all pupils make better progress. It also informs the school on what it needs to do to improve further. Well-constructed plans to improve the school show that leaders know what needs to be done. There are regular reviews to ensure that improvements are effective. The school has initiated many good changes which are beginning to have a positive effect.  The school’s curriculum provides rich and varied activities both in and out of school time, but does not always promote boys’ achievement sufficiently well. Visits and visitors enhance the school’s work. The school provides an increasing amount of sporting activities by using their own

p.6

The leadership and management are good

sports coach and a teacher who takes lessons in the afternoon. Recent improvements to the teaching of reading, writing and phonics have not yet had sufficient time to impact on standards, but progress is picking up rapidly.  Pupils’ spiritual, moral and social development is enhanced by the school’s commitment to ensuring that pupils get regular lessons which promote their personal development. Pupils get access to good quality music lessons and cultural events that promote their understanding of other cultures.  The school has a good relationship with parents. It provides breakfast mornings in the Early Years Foundation Stage, curriculum afternoons and ‘Let’s Cook Together’ sessions to involve parents in their child’s education. This is helping pupils to attend school more regularly and to work hard in lessons.  The school links with a good range of partners that provide good support for pupils with specific

p.6

The leadership and management are good

needs. A strong partnership with 13 other schools is helping the school to use a wide range of expertise to support further improvements in the school.  The leaders of the school get good support from officers of the local authority, who are increasingly confident that the school is moving forward.  The governance of the school:  Governors know the school well as they visit the school often and are given valuable information by the headteacher. They have a wide range of experience and skills and are well- trained. They participate in ‘learning walks’ to further understand the school’s work and look at work in books and talk to teachers. They have a good understanding of the school’s data. They appreciate that teaching needs to develop further and that despite pupils’ improved progress standards still need to rise. Since the previous inspection they tenaciously appointed a new headteacher whom they have supported in appointing new staff. They have developed

p.6

The leadership and management are good

a pupil premium committee which is enabling them to use the pupil premium effectively to improve outcomes for these pupils. Finances are used effectively. The primary sport funding has improved skills in teaching physical education and increased the number of pupils participating in various sporting activities. Performance management is used judiciously and governors reward only those teachers who achieve their targets.

p.7

Grade Judgement Description

Grade 1 Outstanding An outstanding school is highly effective in delivering outcomes that provide exceptionally well for all its pupils’ needs. This ensures that pupils are very well equipped for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 2 Good A good school is effective in delivering outcomes that provide well for all its pupils’ needs. Pupils are well prepared for the next stage of their education, training or employment. Grade 3 Requires improvement A school that requires improvement is not yet a good school, but it is not inadequate. This school will receive a full inspection within 24 months from the date of this inspection. Grade 4 Inadequate A school that has serious weaknesses is inadequate overall and requires significant improvement but leadership and management are judged to be Grade 3 or better. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors. A school that requires special measures is one where the school is

p.8

Grade Judgement Description

failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the school’s leaders, managers or governors have not demonstrated that they have the capacity to secure the necessary improvement in the school. This school will receive regular monitoring by Ofsted inspectors.

p.8

School details

Unique reference number 111647 Local authority Redcar and Cleveland Inspection number 430922

p.9

School details

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.9

School details

Type of school Primary School category Community Age range of pupils 3–11 Gender of pupils Mixed Number of pupils on the school roll 201 Appropriate authority The governing body Chair David Campbell Headteacher Jason Murgatroyd Date of previous school inspection 13 March 2012 Telephone number 01642 455278 Fax number 01642 459167 Email address grangetown_primary_school@redcar- cleveland.gov.uk guidance ‘raising concerns and making complaints about Ofsted', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk . If you would like Ofsted to send you a copy of the guidance, please telephone 0300 123 4234 , or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk .

p.9

School details

You can use Parent View to give Ofsted your opinion on your child’s school. Ofsted will use the information parents and carers provide when deciding which schools to inspect and when and as part of the inspection.

p.10

School details

You can also use Parent View to find out what other parents and carers think about schools in England. You can visit www.parentview.ofsted.gov.uk, or look for the link on the main Ofsted website: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

School details

achieve excellence in the care of children and young people, and in education and skills for learners of all ages. It regulates and inspects childcare and children's social care, and inspects the Children and Family Court Advisory Support Service (Cafcass), schools, colleges, initial teacher training, work- based learning and skills training, adult and community learning, and education and training in prisons and other secure establishments. It assesses council children’s services, and inspects services for looked after children, safeguarding and child protection. Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied. If you would like a copy of this document in a different format, such as large print or Braille, please

p.10

School details

telephone 0300 123 4234, or email enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk . You may copy all or parts of this document for non-commercial educational purposes, as long as you give details of the source and date of publication and do not alter the information in any way. To receive regular email alerts about new publications, including survey reports and school inspection reports, please visit our website and go to ‘Subscribe’.

p.10

School details

T: 0300 123 4234 Textphone: 0161 618 8524 E: enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk W: www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion