Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Dilip Kadodwala
- Postcode verified
NN3 7SW
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- You, ably supported by the deputy headteacher, are raising teachers’ expectations about how much more the pupils should be achieving, making it clear to all staff that if pupils only make expected progress, it is not good enough, particularly for the most-able pupils. p.2
- The school should take further action to: p.1
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Leadership & governance11
“Senior leaders and governors show a strong sense of urgency to make this a good school.” p.2
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 2
- Words of findings
- 631
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 45, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 2
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mr Peter Sturges Headteacher Moulton Primary School Church Hill Moulton Northampton NN3 7SW
p.1
School
Following my visit to your school on 19 March 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.
p.1
School
The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in January 2014. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
School
Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:
p.1
School
identify clearly in the school improvement plan the targets for the proportion of pupils who will be making better than expected progress in each year group to help leaders and governors to measure the success of teaching over time.
p.1
Evidence
During the visit, I held meetings with you, the deputy headteacher, two other leaders and two governors including the Chair of the Governing Body. I also met with a representative of the local authority. We visited all classes to look at the learning that was taking place. I looked at a range of documentation, including the school’s information about pupils’ progress, a sample of pupils’ work and the school’s improvement plan. Serco Inspections Colmore Plaza 20 Colmore Circus Queensway Birmingham B4 6AT T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T : 01216 799169 Direct email : mathew.mitchell@serco.com
p.1
Main findings
Senior leaders and governors show a strong sense of urgency to make this a good school. A key change since the last inspection is the sharper focus on pupils’ progress. Leaders’ checks on pupils’ performance have increased and parents are informed more frequently about their children’s progress in reading, writing and mathematics. You, ably supported by the deputy headteacher, are raising teachers’ expectations about how much more the pupils should be achieving, making it clear to all staff that if pupils only make expected progress, it is not good enough, particularly for the most-able pupils. Leaders, including the subject leaders for English and mathematics, are linking the impact of teaching on pupils’ learning more securely, in the context of a revised teachers’ appraisal system which governors have ratified. You have well-developed plans to further strengthen leadership skills of subject leaders by using the expertise from an effective school where the
p.2
Main findings
headteacher is a Local Leader of Education. Your actions to improve the quality of teachers’ marking have mixed results so far; not all teachers are consistent in meeting your expectations.
p.2
Main findings
Governors are keen to support and challenge. For example, they have made suggestions in the drafting of the school improvement plan and identified how they will check the impact of actions. The plan addresses all of the areas for improvement from the last inspection, with clear milestones to check progress. Leaders have included measurable success criteria against specific priorities for improvement, for example, that of raising pupils’ achievement. However the plan does not clearly highlight what proportions of pupils are being targeted to make better than expected progress across all classes.
p.2
Main findings
Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.
p.2
External support
The local authority has brokered a link with a good school to help improve teaching and the quality of subject leadership. The school improvement adviser has supported school leaders in the formulation of the improvement plan.
p.2
External support
I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children, Schools and Families for Northamptonshire.
p.2
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion