Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 24 Apr 2014

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Lisa Moore

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Lisa Moore

  • Postcode verified

    SL6 7JA

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+87Very positivemore positive than 90% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingpositiveimprovedeffectivecleareffectivelystrengthsclearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
867
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Rehana Juna Headteacher Riverside Primary School Cookham Road Maidenhead SL6 7JA

p.1

School

Following my visit to your school on 20 March 2014, I write on behalf of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Education, Children’s Services and Skills to report the findings. Thank you for the help you gave me and for the time you made available to discuss the actions you are taking to improve the school since the most recent section 5 inspection.

p.1

School

The visit was the first monitoring inspection since the school was judged to require improvement following the section 5 inspection in December 2013. It was carried out under section 8 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

School

Senior leaders and governors are taking effective action to tackle the areas requiring improvement identified at the recent section 5 inspection. The school should take further action to:

p.1

School

 ensure that leaders’ lesson observations more clearly evaluate the impact of teaching on the progress of pupils and in particular the progress of pupils who are more likely to underachieve

p.1

Evidence

During the visit, meetings were held with you and the Chair and another member of the Governing Body. I also had a telephone conversation with a representative of the local authority. I evaluated a range of documentation including the school improvement plan and information relating to the monitoring of teaching. You took Tribal 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0300 123 1231 Text Phone: 0161 6188524 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 0117 311 5359 Direct F 0117 315 0430 Email : christina.bannerman@tribalgroup.com me on a tour of the school and we made brief visits to all classes where I spoke to pupils about their work and looked at their books.

p.1

Context

The school changed its name from Ellington Primary School to Riverside Primary School in January 2014. Since the last inspection two teachers have left the school, a newly qualified teacher has joined the teaching staff and the senior leaders are teaching for a greater amount of time each week.

p.2

Main findings

The school improvement plan focuses on the right priorities for improvement and details clear targets and timelines which will mean that you will be able to measure success. Your week-by-week programme of checking activities will give you useful evidence with which to measure the impact of the actions you are taking.

p.2

Main findings

Teachers are planning activities that more closely match the needs of pupils and expectations have been raised of the standards pupils can achieve. Consequently pupils are moving on to more difficult work more quickly. More able pupils are completing more challenging work in small groups with a dedicated member of staff.

p.2

Main findings

You are using a range of information including visits to lessons, work in pupils’ books and assessment information to build an accurate and comprehensive view of the quality of teaching. While you are developing the way in which you and other leaders observe lessons and give feedback to teachers, there is too little focus on the impact of teaching on pupils’ progress and in particular on the progress of pupils who are more likely to underachieve.

p.2

Main findings

Teachers are making better use of information about pupils’ achievement. This information is discussed well at pupil progress meetings with senior leaders and this helps teachers to spot those pupils who are not doing so well and to provide extra support.

p.2

Main findings

Pupils’ learning targets are a prominent feature in all classrooms. Pupils are able to explain what they are learning and what they need to do to improve. The importance of these targets has been raised through the rewards and recognition pupils receive when they reach their targets. The school council have recently discussed the positive impact of these targets.

p.2

Main findings

A range of useful training has been provided for teachers and teaching assistants. The coaching and mentoring programme is enabling good practice to be shared across the school. Visits to local good and outstanding schools are helping to develop and improve teachers’ practice and is building the capacity for improvement. The attendance and punctuality of pupils have improved as a result of stronger leadership in this area. The parent support adviser is working effectively with parents. Improved communication with parents which emphasises the importance of their child’s attendance at school is having a positive impact.

p.2

Main findings

Governors have received valuable training regarding the interpretation of assessment information. Consequently, they are able to ask more probing questions about the progress pupils are making and how this is being checked by the school. The governing body has a clear understanding of the strengths and areas of improvement for the school. Their increasingly regular visits to the school are developing their understanding of the school’s work.

p.3

Main findings

Ofsted may carry out further visits and, where necessary, provide further support and challenge to the school until its next section 5 inspection.

p.3

External support

Since the inspection the level of support from the local authority has grown. The local authority adviser has provided useful guidance to the headteacher to refine the school’s improvement plan and has brokered a valuable link with a local outstanding school. Useful training has also been given to other senior leaders to develop their leadership skills.

p.3

External support

I am copying this letter to the Chair of the Governing Body and the Director of Children’s Services for Windsor and Maidenhead.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion