Social care · Children's home inspection (SCCIF)
Children's Home run by Surrey County Council in Surrey
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection datesingle source
20 Feb 2014
- Inspectors verified
Kenneth Smith
- URN verified
SC040638
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- It was notable that the staff team were on-board with the changes occurring and throughout the inspection the excellent relationships between staff and young people were evident through observation and discussion with all parties. p.3
- The progress made by the home is substantial and a warm and nurturing ethos has been established. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection. p.3
- The updated Statement of Purpose covers the wider age range now provided for; the young people’s files contain up-to-date information and the manager proactively seeks review updates if there is a delay; and all serious incidents are correctly notified to Ofsted. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 5
- Words of findings
- 776
- shorter than usual (typical 1387)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 38, typical 50
- Average sentence
- 22 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 4
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Unique reference number SC040638 Inspection date 20/02/2014 Inspector Kenneth Smith Type of inspection Interim Provision subtype Children's home
p.1
Date of last inspection 10/09/2013 Website: www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Brief description of the service
The home is a local authority children's homes which may accommodate up to six young people of either gender. The home supports children and young people who present emotional and behavioural difficulties.
p.3
Brief description of the service
At the time of this inspection two young people were resident in the home.
p.3
The inspection judgements and what they mean
Good progress The children’s home has demonstrated continued improvement in quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the large majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Satisfactory progress The children’s home has maintained quality of care and outcomes for children and young people and where appropriate has addressed all requirements and the majority of recommendations that were raised at the previous inspection. Inadequate progress The children’s home has failed to address one or more requirements and/or has not met the majority of recommendations and/or the quality of care and outcomes for children and young people have declined since the last full inspection.
p.3
Progress
Since their previous inspection the service is judged to be making good progress .
p.3
Progress
Over the last twelve months this home has undergone considerable change. At the time of the last inspection the newly appointed manager had been in post only briefly. He is now registered and has begun to implement practices linked to a significant change to the Statement of Purpose of the home. It no longer centres upon 'semi-independence' and now aims primarily to provide a 'safe and nurturing environment' and puts attachment theory at the centre of this. The changes this has prompted have included significant de-institutionalisation of the environment (e.g. the removal of many locks, the introduction of more homely aspects in corridors and one young person decorating her own room) and more child-centred approaches. Activities arranged by and with staff are now clearly structured into each week. Additionally admission of younger children (the previous minimum age was 14) may occur.
p.3
Progress
It was notable that the staff team were on-board with the changes occurring and throughout the inspection the excellent relationships between staff and young people were evident through observation and discussion with all parties.
p.3
Progress
At the previous inspection three requirements and three recommendations were made: these have all been implemented. The updated Statement of Purpose covers the wider age range now provided for; the young people’s files contain up-to-date information and the manager proactively seeks review updates if there is a delay; and all serious incidents are correctly notified to Ofsted. Since the last inspection the manager has ensured that information about advice and advocacy available to young people is accessible to them (on the young people's notice board); sanctions records record young people's views about these when they are given (although the take-up rate is quite low); and individual risk assessments have been updated. It was noted that activity and environmental risk assessments are not in place. This will clarify the function of remaining institutional practices (e.g. locking away sharp knives) where
p.4
Progress
they are needed, and support staff through guidance in taking young people on any adventurous outings.
p.4
Progress
Young people currently accommodated in the home are making significant progress. Behaviour has been challenging over the course of this inspection period, but a change to the dynamic of the group has helped the remaining two young people to settle well and benefit from the strong relationships with staff. Episode of missing have now greatly reduced, as has substance misuse. Through the periods of difficult behaviour careful consideration was given and action taken to manage young people’s safety. Young people have good attendance and progress in education including mainstream school in one instance. Young people feel well cared for by staff, and clearly enjoy living in their current home life. Since the last inspection one young person has left the home and moved into a situation of greater independence.
p.4
Progress
The progress made by the home is substantial and a warm and nurturing ethos has been established. It is also noted that occupancy is currently very low and the challenge to managers will be to sustain this when more children are accommodated.
p.4
Recommendations
To improve the quality and standards of care further the service should take account of the following recommendation(s):
p.4
Recommendations
implement a proportionate approach to risk assessment include the documentary assessment of any significant risks to be countered in the environment and through activities. (NMS 4.5)
p.4
About this inspection
The purpose of this inspection is to assure children and young people, parents, the public, local authorities and government of the quality and standard of the service provided. The inspection was carried out under the Care Standards Act 2000 to assess the effectiveness of the service and to consider how well it complies with the relevant regulations and meets the national minimum standards.
p.5
About this inspection
The report details the progress made by the provider since the last full inspection, identifies any further strengths, any areas for improvement and makes judgements as outlined in the Inspection of children’s homes – framework for inspection.
p.5
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion